Transcriptions » Recently generated summaries of recognized texts

On 15 November 1790, a decision was made in The Hague regarding a legal case. The court was ordered to review, correct, and amend a previous sentence according to the instructions, if necessary. The plaintiff, Omand San Ahijck, was to be heard on this request.

The plaintiff was to be relieved of justice and, if needed, of grace, as deemed appropriate for the case. The defendants, including those from the Court of Civil Justice in Suriname and others involved, were forbidden from taking any action or making innovations related to the case while it was under revision. If any actions were taken contrary to this, they were to be immediately reversed and restored to their original state.

The Court of Civil Justice in Suriname was also ordered to inventory and seal the documents and effects of the mentioned Broresse der Lantijien case, as previously agreed. This inventory was to be made by their sworn clerk or secretary in the presence of the parties or their representatives and then sent to the authorities.

The defendants were to receive a copy of this decision. The document was signed by H. W. van Aijlva and Af. Fagel under the orders of the States General, with the seal of the state affixed.

The States General of the United Netherlands received a humble request in the registry of Her High Mightiness from Daniel Salomon, acting on behalf of Boele van Mons from Rotterdam, living in the neighboring area of Amsterdam. The request stated that the petitioner had been summoned to appear before the Court of Civil Justice in the colony of Suriname on 20 November 1780, represented by Unico Wilkens, to sustain a case against Cleaden de David Cohen, residing in the aforementioned colony.

The case had an unexpected outcome for the petitioner. By sentence of the aforementioned court on 27 April 1780, the petitioner's authorized representative was discharged from his claim against Cleaden de David Cohen, with condemnation of costs in that case. Additionally, the petitioner's authorized representative had further been sentenced in a counterclaim to pay Cleaden de David Cohen a sum of 4200 guilders, 17 stuivers, and 8 pennies in Dutch currency.

In a legal case, Eleaser de David Cohen was ordered to pay Aron and Joseph Jacobs a sum of 12,380 guilders and 10 stuivers in Holland currency. This amount was reduced by 1,696 guilders and 1 vien, due to a payment from a shipment of goods sent by the plaintiff under the consignment of Moses Sanches, but not delivered to Eleaser de David Cohen. The payment was to be made in cash, current in Amsterdam, where the goods were summoned and the payment should have occurred.

The court also ordered Eleaser de David Cohen to pay an additional 18,717 guilders and 17 stuivers in Holland currency for overdue interest, calculated from the day Eleaser de David Cohen defaulted on the payment until 16 August 1776, according to the current account mentioned in the process.

Finally, Eleaser de David Cohen was to pay all costs incurred until full payment was made in Amsterdam by 15 August 1776.

• On 16 December 1790, the High Sheriff and Aldermen of 's-Hertogenbosch issued a public notice due to the increasing number of thefts in the area. The notice included the following rules:
  • No one was allowed to sail on the Dieze river after the evening bell or before the morning bell, nor walk along its banks during low tide. Breaking this rule would result in a fine of 6 guilders.
  • All boats, barges, or other vessels in the Dieze had to be secured with a chain and lock during the forbidden hours. Failing to do so would result in a fine of 3 guilders.
  • Only registered boatmen or those with a special permit from the Aldermen were allowed to keep vessels in the Dieze. Unauthorized vessels would result in a fine of 6 guilders.
• On 28 December 1790, it was announced that on 2 December 1790, the following individuals were appointed as Extraordinary Feudal Officers in the Feudal and Toll Chamber for the capital and its district, upon recommendation by the Council and General Receiver of Domains:
  • Jacques Arnold Henri de Lannoy, former Alderman and Councilman of the city, and collector of provincial taxes for the city and its jurisdiction.
  • Mr. C. [last name not provided in the text].

• The document lists military personnel, likely from a Dutch regiment, with their names, ranks, and locations. Names include:
  • Willem Fredrik Cornelis Jan Pieter Jan Hennes Louis Plorens Jan Rooseboom Rend Johannes Gerardus Johannen Carl Robert Hanrij Jan Gyjsbertus Hendrikus Thomas Berndes Necolaas Johannes Vorrbeerg
  • Adriaan Warie Dilling Ansonie Arnold Nagtegaal
  • Adriaan Vermeeren
  • Pister Earel Gerord
  • Willem Johannes Bartholomues Cornelio Martinus Wilhelmus
• Key dates and places of origin or service are noted:
  • Adriaan Vermeeren was recorded on 18 February 1923.
  • Locations mentioned include Den Haag (29 June 1912, 23 January 1925), Voorschoten (16 May 1923), Rotterdam (19 July 1922), Dordrecht (15 March 1914), Bavel (11 March 1922), Roermond (5 May 1922), Wassenaar (13 January 1922), Assen (1 February 1905, 31 July 1900), and Delft (29 December 1914, 5 October 1900).
• Addresses in various cities are provided, such as:
  • Molslaan 25 and Leidscheweg 379 in Delft.
  • Kade 43a in Rotterdam.
  • Schotelstraat 27 in Dordrecht.
  • Hulvenhoutschelaan C: 2 in Prins Hendrikstraat.
  • Abrikozenstraat 17, Hagestraat 62, and Koningstraat 120 in Den Haag.
  • Weverslaan 25 in Voorburg.
• Transport and military logistics details are included:
  • References to "transp" (transport) with numbers like 2, 23, 26, and 41, possibly indicating units, personnel, or shipments.
  • Mentions of Amersfoort as a key location for troop or supply transport, with notes on officers and headquarters ("Hoofdbeheer") involved.
  • Terms like "gezonden" (sent) and "keengezonden" (not sent) suggest movement or deployment records.
  • An "Oblitie" (likely obsolete or discharged status) is noted for one entry.
• A death record is included:
  • Willem Johannes Bartholomues Cornelio Martinus Wilhelmus died on 23 January 1925 at Molslaan 25 in Delft, aged 20.

On 14 October 1750, a report from Macassar detailed changes in the local government and legal system, along with a criminal case.

• Political and Legal Appointments:
  • On 2 March, Godert Ludolph van Beusechem was removed from his position and later appointed by authorities as a fiscal (legal officer) in Amboina.
  • On 3 July, the elected governor Rosenboom was officially introduced to his role.
  • On 22 April, a tax exemption (sescie) was granted to the shopkeeper Anthonij Ravensberg.
  • Due to the sudden death of the president Wilshuijsen, the merchant and fiscal Jan Dirk van Clootwijk was approved to join the council on 2 March.
  • On 11 April, the under-merchant Camerling was appointed as fiscal, and Anthonij Ravensberg became a member of the council.
  • On 22 April, the chief surgeon took the place of Des Vigues, who had been released.
• The Case of the Inlander Badjo:
  • Badjo, an inlander (local resident), was sentenced to death by hanging in absentia for crimes committed while the governor was away on a northern expedition.
  • The elected governor Rosenboom ensured the execution of the sentence.
  • The charges against Badjo included:
    • Being an accomplice in a theft of rice (particeps furtis arisalieni), though the only evidence came from unreliable witnesses.
    • Allegations of kidnapping (crimen plagi), which lacked proper proof.
    • Attacking guards at the fortress in Maros, though the injuries caused were not fatal.

The following events were described in a letter from Macassar dated 5 June 1744:

• The writer and their forces arrived in Macassar in late November after a difficult journey, having left earlier that month.
• The writer explains why no war council or meetings were held during the conflict: they believed secrecy was crucial. Past experiences showed that when Lord Sautijn held many war councils, decisions were quickly leaked. Attendees shared resolutions with trusted individuals, who then spread the information further. This led to widespread fear and confusion, causing panic even when no real danger existed.
• To prevent this, the writer decided to make decisions alone and keep plans secret, even issuing orders without prior discussion. Initially, this caused some dissatisfaction, but successful outcomes gradually reduced complaints and boosted morale. Soldiers fulfilled their duties bravely, earning praise.
• The writer held only one meeting, not to propose ideas but to ask for advice on overcoming the enemy and natural challenges. Since no one offered useful suggestions, this remained the only meeting.
• The province, after nearly 6 years of relative peace following 4 years of conflict, was beginning to recover. The writer hoped the Dutch East India Company (VOC) would soon benefit from its renewed prosperity.

In a report dated 14 June 1735, Ian A:s Bollman described a site near Macassar with low-quality ore, estimating it would not yield more than 10 caraats (a unit of weight). The area consisted of wild, marble-like mountains with sharp ridges and thick, black, muddy veins containing some iron and traces of gold. Despite examining multiple mountains, Bollman found no signs of significant gold deposits or valuable ore veins. Though the king of the region had offered the gold mines and washing operations to the Dutch East India Company (VOC), Bollman concluded there was little profit to be expected.

He also inspected the VOC's gold mining operations in Sagerie during his trip from Tanetta. The first site, a small hill, produced only worthless mica ("katten glimmer"). The second site, a hill in the rice fields called Bonto Papaninga, had once been a burial ground. Locals later dug there for pots and bowls traditionally buried with the dead, hoping to find gold, but the results were equally disappointing.

The report was signed by Ian A:s Bollman on 22 January 1735 and approved by H.k Hemer, the acting secretary. It was addressed to Johan Saulijn, the Governor and Director of the province.

• On 25 April 1680, officials approved a request from Mo. Po. Welther, dated 15 April 1680. She had sold a house and land in Paramaribo, located at Steenbakkersgracht (known as property N. Lt. Co. 191, D: D7615), to D. C. van Brssel for 1,780 guilders. She requested to skip the "right of nausting" (a type of tax or fee) to finalize the sale. The decision was recorded, and a copy was sent to her as confirmation.
• On 26 April 1680, officials reviewed a request from Meyjl, dated 10 October 1649 (with a later note from 1689). He sought payment from the salary of the official H. C. P. Slengarde for medical services totaling 79 guilders and 80 cents, plus 7 guilders in costs. Since Slengarde had already paid 8 guilders and 45 cents and acknowledged the debt, officials approved a deduction of one-fourth of Slengarde's salary until the remaining 71 guilders and 35 cents (plus costs) were paid. The deduction would be managed monthly by the administration handling Slengarde's salary. Copies were sent to Slengarde and Meyjl for their records.
• On 26 April 1680, officials addressed a government letter from 14 March (referencing earlier letters from 18 January and 15 July 1629). It clarified that only government employees—those appointed by the King and receiving a state income—were required to contribute to pensions. The Governor was instructed to follow this rule, which had already been communicated to Curaçao in 1859. A copy was sent to the Finance Administrator for information.
• On 26 April 1680, officials reviewed a letter from 23 April about changes to the Catharina Sophia plantation’s boiler setup (reduced to 3 boilers and 2 vats) to improve sugar sap processing. They also discussed pension rules, ensuring cases like Marres’ would follow civilian, not military, pension regulations. References were made to earlier decisions from 6 September 1659 and 12 October 1860.

In this document from 3 October 1828, a person (likely Bartholomeus van Ds) wrote their last will on the plantation Patisatie in the colony of Suriname. They appointed H. Goudman and J.F. Langguth as their legal representatives, giving them full power to act on their behalf, including the ability to assign substitutes if needed. The will was approved by the Nieuwe Vries Curatele (a guardianship office) and the Unmanaged Estate Chamber of the colony.

The person declared they owned assets worth 500 guilders. The document was signed in the presence of witnesses, including:

• Nienof D.L. Schulth
• M.B. Niehoff
• J.G. Happen Ann
• S.T. Langguth
• H.N. Wijke
• Hendrik Goudman
• J.D. Arland
• I. Derk Kaesenhout
• Gers (the clerk)

The witnesses Jacobus Olivier Av Haud and Jan Fredrik Kaeisenkynt confirmed the document was signed in their presence. The will was to be followed exactly after the person’s death.

• Langguth, J.F. and J.C. Makensy created a marriage agreement and a will on 26.
• Mesquita, T. d/ and M. Eckhart established marital conditions.
• Muller, J.C., Ant, and J.P. BunderZiel set up a marriage agreement.
• Marchand, L.H., and P.J. Blak did the same.

• M. Heymans and E.S. Bromet signed a marriage agreement.
• Heilbron and A. Abendanon also signed a marriage agreement.
• Hymans J.E. and Marianna Suza signed a similar agreement on 13 Hoth.
• I.H. and J.F. Affortit did the same on 16 Hoth.
• Hopkens Cansie was involved in a case about enslaved people.
• Himman appeared before A.I.D. Rechter (a judge) for a case involving V. Iesseran (also called Samuel) regarding enslaved people.
• Tan de Jager and M.E. Margaard (widow of H. van Rossum) signed a marriage agreement.

• On 9 November, G.C. Huchs and Charlotta Gesina Johanna Krieger got married to J.F. Needer under special marriage conditions set by Forberger.
• The marriage involved a shared estate (property and money) between the couple, with G.C. Huchs bringing in 1,000 guilders and Charlotta Gesina Johanna Krieger acting as the homemaker.
• The document also included a list of enslaved people they owned.
• Witnesses to the agreement were O. Gelder, I. de Liste, A. Benjamins, and H. Eyksche Poormaarder (a local official responsible for poor relief).

• On 9 June 1683, the ship Zuydtbeverlandt set sail from Macassar with strong winds, arriving near Sourabaya on 14 June 1683.
• The captain, Cornelis de Jong, followed orders to go ashore and meet the local merchant and resident, Joan van Meckelen, for information.
• Joan van Meckelen reported rumors about the escape of noble figures from Macassar, including:
  • Cramns Pomelikan (a prince)
  • Other royal children from a rebellious group
• He also reported that the following individuals had moved from Socon to Outang and Allas under orders from Radja Boni:
  • Crain Boni
  • Dain Cisila (his brother)
  • Dain de Boelecan
  • Curcanper Badjo
  • Toecama
• Joan van Meckelen shared this information with authorities, as ordered in a letter dated 5 June 1683.
• Local residents captured some of these fleeing nobles at sea and brought them back.
• Among those captured were:
  • Crain Pomelican Batang Benoa
  • Dain Massoeco

On Saturday, November 1660, at Fort Panecoca, a new rule was set: collecting water outside the fort was no longer allowed for all Dutch East India Company (VOC) members because the new wells inside had enough water.

• Every day, many people arrived from different areas, especially from Torato on the way to Macassar.
• Caain Sumana was tearing down his fort, which was close to the VOC fort.
• Local people living near the fort started moving all their belongings away within 2 to 3 days, leaving their houses empty.
• VOC scouts reported that the king’s cannons and other weapons in his castle were being cleaned and handed out to his people.
• The people of Macassar were working day and night on new defenses, and the VOC was also staying busy.

By November 20, 1660, sickness was spreading rapidly among the VOC members:

• More than half of the Company soldiers were now sick.
• Captain Commandeur Otto Outhoorn was thought to have died the previous night, but he survived.
• Many lieutenants and ensigns, who had stayed strong until then, also fell ill and were near death.
• There was a severe shortage of medicine, and the supply chest brought by the ship De Posteljion was poorly stocked.
• The merchant in charge was blamed for the lack of proper medical supplies.

On 18 October 1746, a report from Macassar detailed expenses and losses due to white ants (termites) and other issues:

• Employees called combaersen were to be kept employed as much as possible, but no new ones should be hired. The Resident was instructed to write about this regarding the post at Boelecomba. A shortage of ƒ500 was noted.
• Damages caused by white ants included:
  • Bamboo sheaths on the Troncq (trunk/central pole): 1.
  • Items in the castle’s medical store:
    • A newly born enslaved girl (likely a reference to a figurine or item named this).
    • A glass of resortis (likely a type of medicine).
    • A drum of soap.
    • Medicines consumed by white ants, costing ƒ37 in the Dutch East India Company (VOC) hospital.
• Other damaged or missing items:
  • Combaersen (laborers or guards): 2 missing.
  • Defective but repairable rice kettles: 2.
  • Iron fire pokers: 1.
  • Fire shovel: 1.
  • Axe head: 1.
  • A female thief (possibly a figurine or tool named this): 1.
• Under the Oppermandador (senior official), a loss of ƒ200 was recorded.
• Hunting lattices (Jager latten):
  • Small lattices: 976 missing.
  • Large lattices: still not delivered from the post at Boelecomba.

On 29 May 1683, a letter from Macassar reported the following:

• Several sailors and soldiers had been sentenced and were to be sent in chains to Batavia (modern-day Jakarta) for forced labor. This included four sailors and three soldiers.
• The ship Macassar had delivered funds and goods:
  • Cash: 6,000 rijksdaalders (equal to ₽18,000).
  • Two chests of medicine worth ₽1,298, 8 stuivers, and 2 pennies.
  • After deducting ₽25, 19 stuivers, and 6 pennies for Batavia's unpaid costs, the total credited to the general account was ₽19,324, 7 stuivers, and 8 pennies.
• Goods sent on the ship Macassar to Banda:
  • 262 lasten (units of weight) of rice at 14 rijksdaalders (₽42) per last, totaling ₽12,009.
  • 35,000 bundles of paddy (unprocessed rice) at 15 stuivers per 130 bundles, totaling ₽309.
  • Combined total for rice and paddy: ₽12,811.
• An additional 130 lasten of rice was unloaded from the yacht Zuytbeverlandt, valued at ₽5,460.
• Bills of exchange (like early checks) were drawn from Ambon in late April and early May:
  • From the Chinese merchant Quekoko: 2,000 rijksdaalders.
  • From the Chinese merchant Souwtsynio: 1,000 rijksdaalders.
  • From the Moorish captain Kotije: 800 rijksdaalders.
  • From the free helmsman Jan Anthonijssen: 400 rijksdaalders.
  • From the local captain Jan Hanssen, payable to the fiscal (financial officer): 1,100 rijksdaalders.
• A transport contract with François Prins amounted to 5,300 rijksdaalders (₽18,271).

• A seller (pachter) must follow Article 5, which requires them to prove where any weak or diluted alcohol came from. If they fail, they must pay a fine of 100 rijksdaalders—half to the fiscal (tax official) and half to the pachter.
• Under Article 8, the pachter is forbidden from selling alcohol to craftsmen, quartermasters, foresters, or sailors (both on land and ships) during workdays at these times:
  • Morning: between 6:00 and 11:00
  • Afternoon: between 13:00 and 17:00
  • Evening: no sales after 21:00
  Workers are also not allowed inside drinking establishments during these hours unless they have special permission from the fiscal. Violations result in a 50 rijksdaalders fine or another punishment decided by the authorities.
• The pachter cannot sell or serve alcohol on the day of the sermon (likely Sunday) or the three days before it. Breaking this rule costs 6 rijksdaalders.
• Under Article 9, the pachter must sell alcohol at the fixed price of 4 stuivers per mutje (a small drink measure) in their tavern, pub, or home.

On 5 November 1653, the following individuals appeared before the notary Adriaen Lock in the presence of witnesses:

• Joffrouw Beatrix Arnouts, widow of Willem d'heer Bidder,
• Alexander Lindo,
• Joffrouw Marianna, widow of David Palatio,
• Sir Jan Perez Caldrion, representing his wife Joffrouw Clara Lindo,
• Joffrouw Leonora Lindo, and
• Joffrouw Isabella Lindo, both adult daughters.

All lived in the same city and were assisted by Caldrion, who acted as their chosen representative. Together, they declared they had given—and continued to give—an irreversible gift to Joffrouw Susanna Lemaire, a widow living in Antwerpen (Antwerp). Susanna was either their daughter or sister.

The gift included all rights and claims to the estate and assets left by Anna Arnouts, who was either their innocent (likely meaning "legally blameless") sister or aunt. The reasons for this gift were:

• Their rightful share of the inheritance from Anna Arnouts.
• The fact that they had supported Anna Arnouts for several years without receiving anything in return.
• The costs they had paid for legal disputes over their parents' estate, as documented in records and decisions.

The group confirmed that all rights and claims to the assets left by Anna Arnouts now belonged to Susanna Lemaire.

• On 11 October 1939, two marriages were recorded in Amsterdam by a civil registrar:
  • Jas, David, a 26-year-old street vendor, son of Jas. Mozes (59, unemployed) and Vrouwtje Laaij, married Bronkhorst, Johanna Maria, a 22-year-old with no occupation, daughter of van Bronkhorst, Joseph (53, janitor) and Lotten, Joanna Elisabeth (51, no occupation). Both families lived in Amsterdam and gave permission. Witnesses were Jas, Hartog (23, merchant, groom’s brother) and van Bronkhorst, Pieter Cornelis (31, traveler, bride’s brother). The marriage was officially declared after public announcement.
  • Jongkind, Henri Simon, a 22-year-old tram conductor, son of Jongkind, Simon (45, construction worker) and Kuyper, Sara (45, no occupation), married Heldoorn, Hendrika, a 20-year-old with no occupation, daughter of Heldoorn, Hermanus (54, coal merchant) and Vriesman, Jannetje (53, no occupation). Both families lived in Amsterdam and gave permission. Witnesses were Heldoorn, Cornelia Martha Maria (33, spool maker, bride’s sister) and Tielemans, Petronella Jannetje (30, no occupation, bride’s sister-in-law). The bride’s mother, Jannetje Vriesman, could not sign due to illiteracy.
• Two divorces were later recorded in Amsterdam:
  • The marriage of Jas, David and Bronkhorst, Johanna Maria ended in divorce by a ruling from the District Court of Amsterdam on 26 September 1946, registered on 10 December 1946.
  • The marriage of Jongkind, Henri Simon and Heldoorn, Hendrika ended in divorce by a ruling from the District Court of Amsterdam on 4 October 1945, registered on 12 December 1945.

• On 9 April 1881, in Amsterdam, the following birth registrations were recorded by the civil registrar:
• Johan Christiaan Eijkelboom, a 33-year-old police officer living at Elfde Weteringdwarsstraat 148, declared the birth of a girl at 3:30 PM in his home. The mother was Johanna Alida Bruntrup, his wife. The child was named Johanna Alida Eijkelboom. Witnesses: Carl Philipp Schilpp (30, police officer) and Lambertus van Twindering (36, police officer).
• Heinrich Carl Wienen, a 35-year-old clerk living at Nieuwe Keizersgracht 78, declared the birth of a boy at 7:00 AM in his home. The mother was Gerarda Marie Matthie, his wife. The child was named Jean Wienen. Witnesses: Johan van Harderwijk (37, carpenter) and Johannes Vlot (33, gardener).
• Auda Solak, a 26-year-old shoemaker living at Lepelstraat 25, declared the birth of a boy at 12:00 PM in his home. The mother was Mara de Vries, his wife. The child was named Meijer Solak. Witnesses: Salomon Goudsmit (38, shoemaker) and Mozes Palak (38, laborer). Due to religious observance (Sabbath), the declarants could not write, and three crossed-out words were approved.
• Levie Roselaar, a 31-year-old laborer living at Valkenburgerstraat 95, declared the birth of a boy at 2:00 PM in his home. The mother was Schoontje Waar, his wife. The child was named Salomon Roselaar. Witnesses: Schilip Rotelaar (45, jeweler) and Jetarus Leper (28, polisher). Due to religious observance (Sabbath), the declarants could not write, and three crossed-out words were approved.
• Laurens Oost van Dijk, a 48-year-old laborer living at Grote Wittenburgerstraat 146, declared the birth of a boy at 4:30 AM in his home. The mother was Gesina Meijer, his wife. The child was named Jacobus Hermanus van Dijk. Witnesses: Gerrit van den Broek (30, laborer) and Pieter Miners (60, ferryman).
• Hillebrand Jaspers, a 24-year-old merchant living at Kezersgracht 41, declared the birth of a boy at 11:30 AM in his home. The mother was Alida Cornelia de Boer, his wife. The child was named Hillebrand Luther Jaspers. Witnesses: Sijfebrand Jaspers (56, shipper) and Caspar Lante Jaspers (31, broker).

• On 7 October 1880, at 5 PM, Theodor Slemens Hackmann, a 20-year-old unmarried shop assistant, died at Grimburgwal 10, Amsterdam. He lived at Nieuwendijk 156 and was born in Ankum, Westphalia. His father was Fritz Hackmann (living in Ankum), and his mother was Wilhelmina Hes (deceased). The death was reported by Joannes Gerardus Fardon (45, messenger) and Johannes Maas (50, caretaker), both living at Binnengasthuis.
• On 7 October 1880, at 1:30 PM, Johannes Vlot, a 27-year-old unemployed man, died at Grimburgwal 18, Amsterdam. He lived at Schans 14 and was born in Enkhuizen. He was unmarried. The death was reported by Joannes Gerardus Pardon (45, messenger) and Johannes Maas (50, caretaker), both living at Binnengasthuis.
• On 7 October 1880, at 3:30 AM, Hendrik van der Putten, a 63-year-old stableman, died at Grimburgwal 10, Amsterdam. He lived at Kerkstraat 149 and was born in Hillegom. He was a widower of Petronella de la Cuisine. The death was reported by Joannes Gerardus Sardon (45, messenger) and Johannes Maas (50, caretaker), both living at Binnengasthuis.
• On 8 October 1880, at 2 PM, Henri Lionni, a 3-year-old child, died at Raamgracht 67, Amsterdam. He was born in Amsterdam and lived at the same address. His parents were Levie Lionni and Eva van Praag. The death was reported by Lyman Swaap (48, diamond worker, uncle) and Hartog Werthum (71, acquaintance), who did not sign due to religious observance of the Sabbath.
• On 7 October 1880, at 11 AM, Hendrik Rollmann, a 57-year-old laborer, died at Grimburgwal 10, Amsterdam. He lived at Lepelstraat 3 and was born in Amsterdam. He was married to Paulina Willemse. The death was reported by Joannes Gerardus Pardon (45, messenger) and Johannes Maas (50, caretaker), both living at Binnengasthuis.
• On 7 October 1880, at 2:30 PM, a stillborn daughter of Jan Frederik Wilhelm Brandenburg (society host) and Cornelia Elisabeth Surenout died at Warmoesstraat 180, Amsterdam. The death was reported by Johannes Hendrik Hoogkamer (40, auctioneer) and Henri Ernest Moguette (36, messenger).

• On 21 March 1815, the death of Barendina Nulandt was recorded. She passed away on 20 March 1815 at 6 AM, aged 70. She lived and died at Noordersstraat 78 in Amsterdam, originally from Eijbergen in Gelderland. She was the widow of Bart van Deventer, with no additional details known. Her death was reported by her sons:
  • Dirk van Deventer, 31 years old, a soldier, living at the same address.
  • Bart van Deventer Jr., 28 years old, a wallpaper hanger, also living at the same address.
  The record was confirmed by Joan Huijdecoper van Maarsseveen, a member of the Civil Registry Commission of Amsterdam.
• On 21 March 1815, the death of Dirk Sprengers was recorded. He passed away on 20 March 1815 at 1 AM, aged 3. He lived and died at Egelantiersstraat 27 in Amsterdam and was born there. He was the son of Machiel Sprengers and Aaltje Ermers. His death was reported by:
  • His father, Machiel Sprengers, 32 years old, a barge worker, living at the same address.
  • Johannes Vlot, 38 years old, a cattle trader, living at Egelantiersstraat 225.
  The father could not sign, but the record was confirmed by Huijdecoper van Maarsseveen, a member of the Civil Registry Commission of Amsterdam.
• On 21 March 1815, the death of Salomon Isaac van Collem was recorded. He passed away on 20 March 1815 at 10 PM, aged 89. He lived and died at the Jewish Home on Rapenburg 256 in Amsterdam and was born there. He was married to Leentje David, with no further details known. His death was reported by his nephews:
  • Josua Snyer, 61 years old, a porcelain seller, living at Koppenburgersteeg 8709.
  • Abraham Joseph Bijer, 26 years old, with the same profession, living at the same address.
  The record was confirmed by Joan Huijdecoper van Maarsseveen, a member of the Civil Registry Commission of Amsterdam.
• On 21 March 1815, the death of Johanna Maria Stolp was recorded. She passed away on the same day, aged 1, aboard a ship named De Kraak, anchored in Amsterdam. She was born in Rotterdam and was the daughter of Johannes Stolp and Maria van den Bout. Her death was reported by:
  • Her father, Johannes Stolp, 40 years old, a vendor, living aboard the ship.
  • Theunis van Pietersz, 35 years old, also a vendor, living in Rotterdam.
  The record was confirmed by Joan Huijdecoper van Maarsseveen, a member of the Civil Registry Commission of Amsterdam.

The document outlines unpaid debts, interest, and financial transactions from the 18th and 19th centuries, primarily involving individuals and organizations in the Netherlands. Key details include:

• Unpaid interest on shares in the Compagnie since 1 July 1865.
• A claim against the widow Eggens ten Oosselt from the municipality of Dalen, amounting to 70 guilders with 5% interest from 1 May 1796 until the separation date, totaling 2 guilders and 62 cents.
• Cash received since the inventory:
  • From Eijsche: 121 guilders and 90 cents (1291).
  • From Velober in 1896: 18 guilders and 3 cents.
  • Interest from Johannes Rot in 1896: 40 guilders and 50 cents.
  • Interest from Johannes Abels in November 1899: 25 guilders and 1 cent.
  • Repayment by Johannes Abels on his debt: 150 guilders.
  • Interest from Johannes Vlot in November 1899: 40 guilders and 50 cents.
  • Interest from Nyland in August 1899: 55 guilders.
  • Interest from Rlaagnogeerd in May 1896: 1,250 guilders.
  • Interest from Rr Amsink in October 1899: 5 guilders.
  • Interest from Weduwe de Goon in May 1899: 57 guilders and 4 cents.
  • From Nortoren, Annaconkont: 250 guilders and 42 cents.
• Proceeds from sold securities:
  • 5 bonds from Hengelosche Stoomwegmaatschappij: 1,295 guilders and 77 cents.
  • 1 bond from Komsluers Spoorwegmaatschappij: 1,033 guilders and 83 cents.
  • 1 bond from Messenien Kantas Spoorwegmaatschappij: 1,034 guilders and 10 cents.
  • Total from sold securities: 4,109 guilders and 30 cents.
• Payments made:
  • Zeegeld in Sneeksche Courant: 2 guilders and 65 cents.
  • Wealth tax: 17 guilders and 50 cents.
  • Articles for household maintenance: 62 cents.
  • Costs for outstanding contributions to the partnership of H. Mijonkend: 600 guilders and 8 cents.
  • Inheritance taxes and stamp duties on receipts: 2,413 guilders, 21 and a half cents.
• Total payments: 3,055 guilders, 25 cents.