Transcriptions » Recently created summaries of historical documents

Users of Open Archives can have a summary made of the transcriptions created using handwriting recognition.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient to make the historical document understandable. In the transcripts, names are underlined in green and clickable (to search the personal entries on Open Archives for the name in question), the recognized dates have a light gray background and recognized place names have a light purple background.


Thos Anderson wrote a bill of exchange in Gothenburg on 22 March 1735. He ordered that one month after seeing the bill, Mr. Lenders Wass should pay 210 Reichsthaler to George Desbard & Son, who were merchants in Amsterdam.

Blieff Pelterson endorsed the bill with an order in Gothenburg on 29 March 1735.

Ant Wass also endorsed it.

Madts Truelsen endorsed the bill with an order from Waldera Ahbergh on 24 April 1735.

Oliff Dittesson ordered payment to Paul Sternberg or his order in Cruiglangen, Ahlburg on 21 April 1735.

Mats Arucelse ordered payment to Johan Fedrich Natorp & Bernder in Herenburgh in the accounting records of Ahlberge on 2 April 1735.

Paul Stomberg endorsed it on behalf of Johan Freidrick Natorp & Orndes in Hamburg on 25 April 1735.

View transcript 


On 1 March 1731, a bill of exchange was issued in Saint Petersburg. Johan Ludolph Dohn or his order was to be paid 250 guilders and a quarter in Dutch currency. The value was received from Jacob Stelling. The payment was to be made through Isaac van Eyl in Amsterdam and then to the order of Johan Friedrich Natorp. The document was witnessed by several people including Johan Sudeloh Dohn, Johannes Das, Adr. Baars (notary), and Jan Krins.
View transcript 


H. Lamers released Jan Natrop from a mortgage on property that Natrop had bought. The mortgage had been placed on the property by the seller through a legal document dated 19 April 1853, which was registered at the mortgage office in Nijmegen on 4 May in register volume 43, number 56. Lamers agreed to the partial removal of this mortgage registration.

The document was created and signed at Heteren in the office of the notary on 20 December 1856. The witnesses present were Carel Johan Hendrik van Kessel, a notary clerk, and Derk Vermeer, an innkeeper, both living in Heteren. After the document was read aloud, the people involved and the witnesses signed it along with the notary.

The document was registered in Elst on 2 January 1857 in volume 46, page 48. Various fees were paid: 50 guilders for cancellation, 12 guilders 80 cents for the release, and additional taxes totaling 3 guilders 86.5 cents. The tax collector was W. Macalester Loup.

View transcript 


View transcript 


View transcript 


The deputies found that certain matters would not be valid, especially when they would affect the rights of a third party. The deputies believed that when a temporary regulation needed to be created for closing the accounts from 1300 to 1304 inclusive, this should be done by their High Mightinesses as executors of the testament of the late Lord of Engelant. A petition was read from Anthonius vander Burgh, minister of God's word at Emmenes within the dike in the district of Utrecht. He stated that their High Mightinesses on 20 June last had granted to the petitioner's son Dendrick vander Burgh the income from 3 scholarships or benefits founded by Aert Swaens, each worth 50 guilders, to study. He requested that their High Mightinesses order the receiver Dirck St. Gravesande to pay out the money he had received before the granting of these scholarships for the benefit of the petitioner's son. After deliberation, it was decided that a copy of the petition would be sent to the General Accounting Chamber so they could send their advice to their High Mightinesses. A petition was read from the governors and inhabitants of Halsteren, Noordgeest and Beijemoeren. They requested that their High Mightinesses grant the petitioners permission to negotiate a sum of 15,000 guilders to pay: After deliberation, it was decided that a copy of the petition would be sent to the Council of State so they could send their advice to their High Mightinesses. A petition was read from Willem Veltman, master ship's carpenter, and Gerritt 't Heen, master tree maker, both citizens of the city of Amsterdam. They stated that after much effort, time loss and very heavy costs, they had finally invented the making of a double pump to pump water out of ships and elsewhere, with which they could pump up 4 times as much water in the same time as with ordinary pumps, and with no more manpower. The petitioners had also invented a new invention for the ship's wheel and residents.
View transcript 


A bailiff demanded from the people listed above the immediate payment of 1,900 guilders plus interest from 12 December 1913 at 4.5 percent per year, as well as the costs of serving notice and making the demand. When no payment was received, the bailiff announced that the creditor would use the irrevocable power of attorney to proceed with a public sale of the mortgaged real estate on Friday 29 May 1914 at 1 o'clock in the afternoon at the Friesche Koffiehuis in Velseroord, municipality of Velsen, before notary Gerrit Daniel Boerlage or another authorized notary or candidate notary who would replace him. The sale would recover the principal amount, interest, costs, and whatever else was owed to the creditor under the deed. The costs amounted to 10.22½ guilders. The document was registered in Haarlem on 16 May 1914, volume 14, folio 154 verso, section 4.

Klaas Koster, a café owner living in Ymuiden, municipality of Velsen, gave power of attorney to Henri Albert Buisman, a candidate notary living in Velsen, to sell publicly on his behalf the real estate that had been mortgaged. This power of attorney was based on article 1223 of the Civil Code, granted in a loan deed with mortgage on 17 December 1908 before notary G. D. Boerlage in Velsen, made against the heirs of Hendrik Veltman and Cornelia Wekker, who had lived in Velseroord, municipality of Velsen. The property consisted of 3 residential houses and 1 residential and commercial house with plots on Kalverstraat E14, 14-a, 16, and 18 in Velseroord, municipality of Velsen, registered as cadastral municipality Velsen (division Ymuiden), section

View transcript 


Hendrik van der Hoven, Maertij Tmerck Aelbertsz, and Marta Pieter Abrans (the second parties) agreed to fully settle all matters without keeping anything back or making any reservations. They also gave up any claims or demands they might have against the two first parties. In return, the second parties received a sum of 35 carolus guilders, which they received and accepted in the presence of the notary and the first party. With this payment, the second parties agreed to fully release the first parties from all obligations. They pledged their persons and property as guarantee for this agreement, without any exceptions, and placed themselves under the authority of all courts, especially the court of Holland. They consented to have this agreement recorded officially. This was done and completed in Haarlem, with Simon Hendriks and Willem Veltman present as witnesses. The document was signed by Hendrik van der Hoven, Maertij Tmerck Aelbertsz, Marta Pieter Abrans, Willem Veltman, and Simon Tmerck, and confirmed by the notary.

View transcript 


J. Veltman, who was a Director and Head of the Telegraph office in Miedhecht, found it acceptable that the previously mentioned documents about Musheu Outbrecht could still be submitted for receipt, even though they appeared to have been lost despite being requested on time, but had meanwhile been found again. On 6 July 1812, a letter was sent to the Minister of Colonies. The writer politely requested His Excellency to return the documents concerning his student Willem Veltman, which had been withheld from being admitted to the examination for training as a military pharmacist in the Indies. The documents could not be submitted because the certificate of the literary-mathematical examination could not be provided, and therefore he could not be considered for the examination. The letter was written in Miedrecht on June 1804.
View transcript 


Willem Veltman, who lived in the Coolsteegh coming out at the Burghwal in Haarlem, appeared before notary Melchior van Clijnenberg on 26 June 1709. He declared that he owed Hendrick Meerman, who lived in the city of Rees in the land of Cleeff, the sum of 100 guilders in capital. This debt came from money that had been properly lent and provided to him, which Veltman admitted he had received and used long ago from Meerman. He gave up the right to claim that the money had not been counted out to him. Veltman accepted and promised to pay interest at the rate of 25 per 100 per year, to be counted from the date of this document until the debt was fully paid. To guarantee this, Veltman declared he would bind his person and goods, placing them under the control of all courts and judges. This document was passed in Haarlem in the presence of Hendrik van Eeckent and Bruijn as witnesses.

View transcript 


16 February 1769 Catharina Oostkort, an unmarried adult woman living in Amsterdam, appeared before notary Isaac Pool, who was licensed by the Court of Holland. She appointed Abraham Boots, a lawyer for the court of the city of Alkmaar, as her legal representative. He was given full authority to handle all her legal cases, both as plaintiff and defendant, at all court levels. This included pursuing cases through to final judgment and execution. He could do everything that Catharina Oostkort herself could do if she were present, and he had the power to appoint substitutes. She promised to approve his actions and be legally bound by them. The document was signed in Amsterdam with witnesses Gerrit van Houten and Hermanus Meyer present.
View transcript 


February 20, 1823, at 11 o'clock in the morning, the death of Anna Maria Ooskort was registered. She died on February 19 at 4 o'clock in the morning at the age of 85 years. She lived on Tyidsrraat number 49, Canton 33, and died there. She was born in Stemport and was the widow of Barend Veltman. The deceased left behind property without real estate and had children. This was declared by Willem Veltman, 52 years old, living at the address mentioned above, son of the deceased, working as a clockmaker, and by Jan Veltman, 26 years old, living at the address mentioned above, working as an actor, also son of the deceased. After being read aloud, the document was signed by both witnesses and confirmed according to the law by a member of the Commission for Civil Registration of the City of Amsterdam.

February 20, 1823, at 11 o'clock in the morning, the death of Antonie Fikkert was registered. He died on the same day at 4 o'clock in the morning at the age of 3 weeks. He lived on Ooomstraat number 74, Canton 6, and died there. He was born there as the son of Maria. The deceased left behind property without real estate and had children. This was declared by Cornelis Kroon, 60 years old, living at the address mentioned above, working as a skipper, brother-in-law of the deceased, and by Johannes Nieman, 49 years old, living on Zwartlakenstegg number 16, working as a tailor, nephew of the deceased. After being read aloud, the document was signed by the second witness, as the first declared he could not write, and confirmed according to the law by a member of the Commission for Civil Registration of the City of Amsterdam.

February 20, 1823, at 11 o'clock in the morning, the death of Johan Prins Louis Dunhard was registered. He died on February 19 at 3 o'clock in the morning at the age of half a year. He lived in the workhouse and died there. He was born there as the son of Johan Christof and Aanna Christina Schmitten. According to an official report from the workhouse mentioned above, the deceased left behind property without real estate and had children. After being read aloud, the document was confirmed according to the law by a member of the Commission for Civil Registration of the City of Amsterdam.

February 20, 1823, at 11 o'clock in the morning, the death of Elisabeth Maria Moreau was registered. She died on the same day at 3 o'clock in the morning at the age of 7 years. She lived on Hlorestraat number 138, Canton 5, and died there. She was born there as the daughter of Territ Moreau and Anna Janren. The deceased left behind property without real estate and had children. This was declared by the father, 33 years old, living at the address mentioned above, working as a shoemaker, and by Nicolees Moreau, 36 years old, living on Lindent number 2, working as a supervisor, uncle of the deceased. After being read aloud, the document was signed by both witnesses and confirmed according to the law by a member of the Commission for Civil Registration of the City of Amsterdam.

View transcript 


Catharina Koster declared that she was completely satisfied with the arrangements that had been made for her. She stated that she greatly preferred to receive 30 stuivers per week for the rest of her life instead of receiving the legitimate portion (her legal share of inheritance) that she would otherwise be entitled to receive from the estate when the person died without children. She explicitly declared that she gave up her right to this legitimate portion. This document was signed in the city of Haarlem in the presence of witnesses Gerrit Koenderink Junior and Isaac van der Tholl. The document was signed by Jan Veltman, Gerrit Koenderink Junior, Maria Vos, and Catharina Koster (who made her mark), Isaac Van Der Tholl, Barent Veltman, and notary Jacob Clout on 29 January 1790.
View transcript 


View transcript 


Nicolaas Brenkelaar, a peace judge in Canton Two, District Amsterdam, made and issued a certificate of acknowledgment on 1 October 1811. This document showed that the grandparents on both sides of Abram Hinken had died.

On 6 October 1811, the same Nicolaas Brenkelaar issued a similar certificate showing that the grandparents on both sides of Katrina Rempel had also died.

The marriage announcement for these two people was properly prepared on 18 October 1811 and posted at the town hall of this municipality on 20 October 1811. No objections were received against the marriage.

After the couple clearly declared to the official that they would take each other as spouses, he announced in the name of the law that Abram Winken and Katrina Rempel were legally united. The marriage certificate was signed by the spouses and witnesses, along with the official Gerrit ten Sande (deputy mayor).

The witnesses were:

On 3 November 1811, another couple appeared before the deputy mayor of the city of Amsterdam as civil registrar to arrange a marriage. The witnesses present were Evert van de Grampel (living on Voorburgwal across from the New Church), Pierre Francois Franssen (at the town hall), Jan van Batenburg (in Vijzelstraat), and Willem van Lieuwen (in Utrechtse Dwarsstraat), all living in this city.

The couple consisted of Pieter Barbiers, 53 years old, a painter, born in Amsterdam, widower of Joanna Louisa Vryck, living in Slandboogstraat near Sleijigeweg number 5. He was the son of Antony Barbiers and Martj van Gijsen, both deceased.

The bride was Joanna Gesina Everstyn, 29 years old, born in Amsterdam, without profession, living at the same address. She was the daughter of Joannes Everstyn and Joanna Gesina Reuzekamp, both deceased.

The following documents were presented:

  1. The baptism certificate of Pieter Barbiers, issued by Gerrit ten Sande, deputy mayor of this city. It showed he was baptized in the Roman Catholic Church called the Post Horn on 1 April 1758 as the child of his aforementioned parents.
  2. The baptism certificate of Joanna Gesina Everstyn, issued by W. E. Bouman, Roman Catholic priest in the same church. It showed she was baptized there on 14 August 1782 as the child of her aforementioned parents.
  3. The death certificate of Joanna Louisa Vryck, wife of Pieter Barbiers, issued by W. H. Voombergz, deputy mayor of this city. It showed she was buried in the South Churchyard.
View transcript 


Pieter Barbiers, an artist, lived in the Kleine Houtstraat in Haarlem. On 21 August 1811, he appeared before notary Jacob Scholting, who lived in Haarlem in the First District of the Department of the Zuiderzee, to make his will.

Pieter Barbiers declared under oath that he did not belong to a higher class of wealth than indicated by the official stamp used on this document. He cancelled and voided all previous wills and last testaments he had made before this date. He declared that if he should die without children, he appointed his wife Maria Geertruij Snabilie as his sole heir to everything he would leave behind after his death, as far as the law allowed him to freely decide about it, with full inheritance rights.

View transcript 


On 3 October 1800, Jessuran Sentoe and Klaartje Koeper were married in Amsterdam, and their child was properly recognized and made legitimate.

On 21 August 1815 at 10 o'clock in the morning, a birth certificate was registered for Jacob Koeper, who was born on 18 August in the evening at 8 o'clock. He was the son of Elara Jacob Koeper, who had no profession and lived at the corner of Kerkstraat and Amstel number 183, district 1. The child was recognized as being male. The witnesses were David de Pinto, 27 years old, a tobacco seller living at the same address number 133, and Isaac Jacob Koeper, 41 years old, a merchant living at Korte Houtstraat number 36. The request was made by Beeltje Franck, a midwife, 42 years old, living at Sint Anthonies Breedstraat number 44. After being read aloud, the document was signed by the midwife and both witnesses, and confirmed by David Bierens, member of the Commission for Civil Registration of the city of Amsterdam.

On 21 August 1815 at 10 o'clock in the morning, a birth certificate was registered for Pieter Barbiers, who was born on 19 August at 1 o'clock in the afternoon. He was the son of Pieter Barbiers Anthonies, a painter, and Johanna Gesina Everstin, without profession, a married couple living at Kerkstraat near Spiegelstraat number 171, district 3. The child was recognized as being male. The witnesses were Joannes Baptista Barbiers, 28 years old, a clerk at the city hall living at Reguliersplein number 7, and Frans Philippus Ernst, 24 years old, with the same profession, living at Prinsengracht near Leidschestraat. The request was made by the father. After being read aloud, the document was signed by the father and both witnesses, and confirmed by Gerrit ten Sande, member of the Commission for Civil Registration of the city of Amsterdam.

On 21 August 1815 at 10 o'clock in the morning, a birth certificate was registered for Isaac Moses Willing, who was born on 20 August in the morning at 8 o'clock. The child was the son of Moses Gabriel Willing, a buyer of old clothes, and Goetje Salomon Deper, without profession, a married couple living at Bestaviersstraat number 114. The child was recognized as being male. The witnesses were Eliazen Levie Azijnman, 36 years old, a merchant living at Batavierstraat number 90, and Raphael Sierk Opasser, 22 years old, a buyer of old clothes living at Marken 18-141. The request was made by the father. After being read aloud, the document was signed by both witnesses. The father declared he could not write. The document was confirmed by David Bierens, member of the Commission for Civil Registration of the city of Amsterdam.

On 21 August 1815 at 10 o'clock in the morning, a birth certificate

View transcript 


View transcript 


On 15 August 1849, Paulus Bartels, a 41-year-old servant living at the Buitengasthuis, and Jan Lankhorst, a 33-year-old servant living at the same address, appeared before the civil registry official in Amsterdam. They declared that on 13 August 1849 at 6:00 in the afternoon, Cornelia Klaversma died at house number 220 in Canton 11, Goestdom. She was a 42-year-old cleaning woman who lived on the Overtoom. She was born in Amsterdam and was married to Gerardus ter Hoeven. Her parents were Arie and Alida Schrender, both deceased.

On the same date, 15 August 1849, the same witnesses, Paulus Bartels and Jan Lankhorst, appeared before the civil registry official in Amsterdam. They declared that on 15 August 1849 at 1:00 in the morning, Anna van der Vaal died at house number 220 in Canton 4. She was 27 years old, had no occupation, and lived at Ridderstraat 30. She was born in Amsterdam and was married to Hendrik van Driessel. Her parents were Willem (deceased) and Maria Peeters.

On 15 August 1849, Paulus Bartels and Jan Lankhorst appeared again before the civil registry official in Amsterdam. They declared that on 13 August 1849 at 9:00 in the afternoon, Hendricus Johannes Koning died at house number 220 in Canton 4, Overtoom. He was a 39-year-old rope maker who lived on the Oudenburgsteeg. He was born in Amsterdam and was married to Jansje Jorsman. His parents were Jan Wetsel and Christina Stemmega, both deceased.

On 15 August 1849, Gerardus Cornelius Jan Meurs, a 51-year-old pharmacist living at Halsteeg 143, and Christoffel Andreas Schoeman, a 23-year-old pharmacist living at Heilige weg 20, appeared before the civil registry official in Amsterdam. They declared that on 14 August 1849 at 6:00 in the morning, Willem Hermanus Boonstra died at house number 8 in Canton 1, Suikerbakkersteeg Houtgracht. He was a 33-year-old mechanic who lived at the same address. He was born in Amsterdam and was married to Cornelia Landman. His parents were Joannes Piers Boonstra and Johanna Bolten, both deceased.

On 15 August 1849, Paulus Bartels and Jan Lankhorst appeared before the civil registry official in Amsterdam. They declared that on 14 August 1849 at 8:00 in the morning, Anna Maria Leduc died at house number 220 in Canton 4, Overtoom

View transcript 


View transcript 


On 13 October 1677 in Huijden, Claes Vinck, an apothecary living in Amsterdam, appeared before Reijnier Duee, a public notary admitted by the Court of Holland and residing in Amsterdam. Claes Vinck made this declaration in two roles: as uncle and guardian over the children of Jan Claesz Steckman and as a creditor of the estate of Jan Jaep Gerritsz, who had lived at the Haesp. Claes Vinck authorized and gave power to Cornelis Van Drosthagen, an attorney in Vleespomme, to represent him in both of these roles. Cornelis Van Drosthagen was to handle the case against the other general creditors of the mentioned estate before the aldermen of Weesper Carspel. He was authorized to take legal action before these aldermen, both as plaintiff and defendant, and to do everything that would be required in the case, just as Claes Vinck himself could do if he were present. Claes Vinck promised to accept whatever his attorney did. This document was done properly in Amsterdam in the presence of Cornelis Croock and Johannes Tijm, who were asked to serve as witnesses.
View transcript 


11 February 1780 In Haarlem, Cornelis van Drosthagen and his wife Anna Magdalena Wessels appeared before notary Julius Hendrik Fribiehen. Anna Magdalena Wessels was assisted by her husband, who gave her special permission to sign this document. They declared that they had sold a small lottery bond to Jan Koning, a merchant from Amsterdam. The bond had the following details:
  • Issued by the United Netherlands at the General Office of the Union in The Hague
  • Part of a lottery for half of 6,000,000 guilders, increased by another 3,000,000 guilders
  • Letter designation: F. R. S.
  • Capital value: 400 guilders
  • Dated 1 January 1713
  • Number: 351
  • Registered on folio 188 verso
  • Approved on 10 November 1713, registered on folio 1258 verso
The sellers had received this bond through an official transfer document dated 6 May 1774, passed before notary Jacob Elout in Haarlem, from Isaak van der Vinne and Jan van Walré. The sellers confirmed they had been fully paid for the bond, including both the capital and any interest that was due. They gave Jan Koning full ownership rights and promised to protect him against any future claims on the bond. They bound themselves and their possessions to this agreement according to law. Witnesses were Albertus Prince and Claas Westerhout.
View transcript 


  • On 20 December (year not stated), a legal document was drawn up before notary Julius Hendrik Froichen in Haarlem.
  • Egbert Agterhier, living in Haarlem, appeared as the special representative of Kaatje van Drosthag, who was the wife of Mr. Jan Boeve.
  • His authority came from a power of attorney document dated 21 June 1783, which was prepared by Z. W. Hartman, who was the mayor of the lordship of Zalk and Vekaten and notary there.
  • Egbert Agterhier, acting as representative, declared that he had sold and transferred a bond to the noblewoman Petronella Maria Heshuysen.
  • The bond was issued by the Province of Holland and West Friesland, registered at the office in Haarlem.
  • The bond was blank, worth 290 guilders in capital, dated 1 October 1687, numbered 1 D. 210 No. 1, and approved on 5 March 1688, number 1773.
  • The bond had been transferred to Kaatje van Drosthagen by Albertus Rennenbergh through a private transfer document dated 25 March 1774.
  • The representative confirmed that the buyer, the noblewoman Petronella Maria Heshuysen, had fully paid the purchase price, including both the capital and all interest that was due.
  • He therefore gave her full receipt and transferred to her all rights, claims, and ownership that his principal Kaatje van Drosthagen had held up to that date.
  • He promised to protect and guarantee the bond against all claims forever and against everyone, binding the persons and goods of Jan Boeve and Kaatje van Drosthagen as married couple for this purpose.
  • The document was signed in Haarlem in the presence of witnesses Pieter van Lee and Daniel van (surname incomplete).
View transcript 


On 27 December 1934, two marriages took place in Amsterdam before a civil registrar.

The first marriage was between Jacques Antonius Baartmans, a 64-year-old school principal born in Nijmegen and living in Maarheeze, and Clara Louise Constance Bunnemeijer, a 49-year-old woman without a profession who was born and living in Amsterdam. Jacques Antonius Baartmans was a widower whose late wife was Maria Johanna van den Borne. His parents, Johannes Jacobus Baartmans and Johanna ten Ham, were both deceased. Clara Louise Constance Bunnemeijer was the daughter of Hermann Friedrich Carl Bunnemeijer, who was deceased, and Maria Augusta Fredrica Lambertina Hake Wessell, who had no profession and lived in Amsterdam. The marriage announcement had been posted without objection in Amsterdam and Haarheeze on 15 December. The bride and groom declared they accepted each other as spouses and would faithfully fulfill all duties required by law. The registrar then declared them married by law. The witnesses were:

The second marriage was between Antonius Arends, a 27-year-old office worker born and living in Amsterdam, and Frida Karle, a 25-year-old German woman without a profession who was born in Böckingen in Germany and living in Amsterdam. Antonius Arends was the son of Antonius Arends, a 52-year-old watchman, and Johanna Geertruida Lassing, a 49-year-old woman without a profession, both living in Amsterdam. Frida Karle was the daughter of Wilhelm Karle, a bricklayer, and Anna Schmitt, without a profession, both living in Böckingen in Germany. The groom's parents gave their permission for the marriage. The marriage announcement had been posted without objection in Amsterdam on 15 December. The bride and groom declared they accepted each other as spouses and would faithfully fulfill all duties required by law. The registrar then declared them married by law. The witnesses were:

Both witnesses lived in Amsterdam.

View transcript 


Thomas van der Velde, a shipwright at the East India Company shipyard, and his wife Elisabeth Veltman, living on Wittenburg in the small street in Amsterdam, appeared before notary Johannes Boots on April 2, 1723 in the evening at 6 o'clock. They were both healthy in body and mind. Thinking about the fragility of life and the certainty of death, they made their last will and testament. They cancelled all previous wills they had made. Out of marital love and affection for each other, they appointed each other as the sole and universal heir to all their possessions, including movable and immovable property, shares, credits, and rights, with no exceptions, that the first one to die would leave behind.

View transcript 



Previous pageNext page

Find your ancestors and publish your family tree on Genealogy Online via https://www.genealogieonline.nl/en/