Users of Open Archives can have summaries generated from the recognized texts (transcriptions) produced through text recognition (OCR) and handwriting recognition (HTR). Neither of these artificial intelligence tasks is perfect, but they are often more than sufficient to make the historical document understandable. In the transcripts, names are underlined in green and clickable (to search the personal entries on Open Archives for the name in question), the recognized dates have a light gray background and recognized place names have a light purple background. The results of the application of (European) artificial intelligence have not been verified by a human.
1746:
- On 25 January, 5 March, 23 March, 10 May, 15 May, and 16 May, documents were received by ship.
- On 18 May, documents were received by Hof d'Uno.
- On 10 June, documents were received by Cabo de Goede Hoop.
The register of papers includes:
- A letter from Hendrik Swellengrebel, Council Extraordinary and Governor, and the Council to the High Indian Government, dated 11 August 1745.
- A letter from the same to the same, dated 27 September 1745.
- A letter from the same to the same, dated 27 October.
- A letter from the same to the same, dated 15 January 1746.
- A letter from the same to the same, dated 21 February.
- A letter from the same to the same, dated 7 February.
- A letter from the same to the same, dated 10 March.
Ships mentioned:
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 2681 / 0007
On
15 June 1693, from
Macassar:
- Crain boelecombas people complained about their leader. The dispute between him and Craij odjonglave was paused. Their ship was burned for its ironwork by people from Tentolij. 33 men from Kaijelij were robbed of their goods by Tentoliers. Aijmuijse Chinesen lost their goods near Tontolij and stayed in Arou Tennette.
- The King of Boelecomba had previously complained about his people running away to join Heer Presid. Hartsing's group after his departure. They were called to Macassar to resolve this, but only the dispute between Crain boelecombas and Craij odjonglave over the Negorij bellenijson village remained. This village had 33 people. Craij odjonglave claimed it was given to him in a division in 1687 by Fiscael Carisse and Aroe Tanette Matoa, but Boelecomba denied this, saying there were two villages with that name. They agreed to wait for Aroe Tanette Matoa, who was in Bonij, to settle the dispute.
- On 30 May 1693, a small ship from Kaijelij with 11 Chinese people arrived. They said that 4 months ago, their ship, strengthened with 45 copper plates under Anachoda Quanko from Spieuw, had sailed from China to Borneo, Macassar or Banjer Massing. Near Tentolij, 10-12 miles north of Kaijelij, their ship hit a reef. Their cargo of silk, porcelain, tobacco, lacquerware, and quilts was mostly stolen by Tentoliers, who also burned their ship for its ironwork. The remaining crew and Anachoda were left in Kaijelij and planned to go to Japara on the coast of Java.
- Gold mining in Lamolo was poor, with only 52 ¾8 worth of gold collected. 16½ loads of green ladjang were sent, costing ƒ16384 16 18.
- The King of Coetij, about 14 years old, was the son of Arou goagoa and the daughter of Arou tekas. He was engaged to the daughter of Radija baijshius and Aroe goa goa, and also to the daughter of Aroe Teko.
- On 7 May 1693, the King of Coetij arrived in Macassar with 3 ships and a large boat from Borneo. He reported that 40-50 pirate ships were cruising between Banjer Massing and Passer, making the area unsafe. In a clash near Pamanoekan, his father Poerobaija was killed. The pirates were said to come from the west and Blitonse Islands, or from Iohoor or Palembang, and planned to return with the east wind.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1535 / 0608
On
15 June 1693, from
Macassar, the following was reported:
- The assistant merchant was well instructed and strengthened according to previous orders to withhold a shipment of green Cadjang and, under Article 25 of the treaty, force compliance if necessary. The original Malay obligation in favor of the major was shown, and gifts were given.
- A letter and gifts from Their Highnesses were prepared for the Raja of Tambora to explain their intentions and better support their people. A well-armed ship, the Chialoep Macassar, was sent with Sabandhaer Mons. Iunius to counter Ioannes Junius, known for causing trouble in the region. The ship was reinforced with 1 corporal and 8 soldiers, plus two 3-pound cannons. It departed on 8 June 1693.
- S. Iunius was to follow overland to Bankala. Instructions and credentials were given, including orders to buy 20-30 loads of green Cadjang for Batavia, with trade goods provided.
- If Raja Biema refused to comply, allies would likely force him by arms, per Article 25 of the Boni contract. A well-armed ship would be sent to represent the Company's interests.
- Three local ships (bielos) were seized near Mandaer for illegal trade, carrying goods like slaves, porcelain, and textiles. Their cargo violated the Company's contract with Mandaer’s rulers. Confiscation was ordered.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1535 / 0606
On
15 June 1693, a letter from
Macassar reported a murder that caused great unrest. The murder involved high-ranking figures, including
Radja Goa,
Radja Bima, and
Radja Dompo, and threatened to spark conflict among their allies and the
EComp. (East India Company). The victim was a queen related to both
Radja Goa and
Radja Bima, and the accused,
Radja Dompo, was closely connected to them by blood.
The murder created tension, with each side blaming the other and preparing for armed conflict. The
East India Company's resident in
Macassar had so far managed to prevent violence, but the situation remained dangerous. To address this, a meeting was held on
19 May 1693 in
Macassar with allies including
Djaos Bonij,
Goa,
Tello,
Tenetto,
Laijoe,
Sumbawa, and
Boelecomba.
Radja Goa asked the
East India Company and its allies to help resolve the dispute fairly and restore peace.
After discussion, it was decided that the
East India Company would send letters to
Radja Bima and
Radja Dompo, urging them to avoid further conflict and instead travel to
Macassar to settle the matter according to the 25th article of the
Boni contract. This would allow the
East India Company and its allies to mediate and ensure justice while maintaining peace.
To deliver these letters quickly, the fast ship
Pachall, captained by
l de Rooij, was chosen. It was manned by experienced sailors, including
Tokamma, a servant of
Bonij, and equipped with weapons. The ship departed on
25 May 1693 with the letters, which were written in peaceful terms.
Additionally, the
East India Company sent instructions to their resident in
Macassar,
Christoffel Nootnagel, to ensure the kings followed the orders.
Nootnagel was advised to be cautious, especially with
Radja Bima, who was suspected of involvement in the murder. If
Radja Bima resisted,
Nootnagel was to gather information and report back, while also being prepared to leave
Macassar if the situation became too dangerous.
Due to ongoing unrest, the
East India Company further deliberated on
30 May 1693 and decided to send more urgent and forceful orders to the kings and local rulers to resolve the conflict and maintain peace.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1535 / 0604
On
15 June 1693, a report from
Macassar detailed events involving
Radja Laboe and the
Laboe rijxstenden (Laboe nobles).
Radja Laboe had examined and executed individuals found guilty, including
Radija Bonij, and informed
His Highness. The
VHoEd (likely a governing body) expressed concern over potential unrest among allies due to such actions.
The text also mentioned
Chenning, son of a banned
Ed. van den Coning van Laboe, who faced accusations of serious misconduct, including relations with his father’s wife and his wife’s sister.
Additionally, a dispute between
Tambora and
Bima over the
kalonkonesen (possibly a type of tax or resource) in the
Burase Negorij Soemij was resolved on
17 April, with
Radja Tambora receiving 1/3 of the
wawaroenesen (likely a resource or goods) and
Bima the remainder. However, a conflict arose when a group of
wawaroeneten was attacked in the district of
Can Core, under
Radja Dompo, leading to further complaints.
Regarding 24 escapees from
Batavia (likely Dutch colonists) who fled to
Sumbawa, 18 were initially captured, but one died of illness, leaving 17.
Radja Sumbawa was ordered to send them back to
Batavia with reasonable compensation for their captors, as they had fled due to inability to pay taxes imposed by their masters (mostly
Chinese and
Indigenous inhabitants).
A tragic event was also reported: the
Queen of Dompo and two of her ladies-in-waiting were murdered in
Combo while overseeing the preparation of her ships. This was confirmed by multiple letters from
Radja Bima and
Radja Dompo between
13 May and
18 May, and further detailed in a letter from the resident on
19 May, received on
25 May.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1535 / 0602
1695-05-06 and
1693-05-06:
Nicolaes Craeijevanger, a preacher in
Macassar, wrote to
François Prins, the president, and the honorable council. He stated that he understood their response to his request from
1693-01-14 and was appealing to the High Council of
India or a suitable assembly. He felt the council was biased against him and had rejected his request unfairly. He also mentioned that he had sent the keys through the sexton but was appealing their decision.
1693-06-11 and
1693-06-15:
Nicolaes Craeijevanger wrote again, listing documents related to his case, including letters from the King of
Bima and
Dompo, and a request from
Hendrik Collaer, a merchant and second in command.
1693-06-15: After their last letter sent on
1693-05-06, a Chinese captain named
Onwatko appeared at the castle in
Macassar before the president. He reported on behalf of his wife,
Rada Bonij, that one of her prominent concubines,
Sittij, had eloped with a
Toeboes prince named
Chenning, who was the son-in-law of the King of
Toeboe.
Rada Bonij had sent
Sittij under escort to
Loeboeg so that the king there could examine and punish her according to local laws. This information was sent to
Willem van Outhoorn, the Governor-General, and the Council of
Netherlands India in
Batavia, received on
1692-07-01.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1535 / 0600
1693-
05-06: In
Macassar, a church elder,
Craijevanger, was accused of several misconducts:
- He insulted officials and was excommunicated without informing the police.
- He improperly administered communion to the wife of surgeon Riddersvelt without church council approval.
- On 1693-01-09, he submitted a defamatory document against Hendrik Berghuijsen, a junior merchant, without evidence.
- He sent a passionate letter to Captain Harman Hanssen, a 70-year-old man.
- He refused to give a church attestation to Juffrouw Cossenobel, a respected long-time church member, before her departure to Amboina.
- During sermons, he publicly criticized the local council, including in a sermon on 1692-12-21, claiming the church was being disrespected without punishment.
- He often skipped sermons, leaving the pulpit empty for 4-5 weeks without valid reasons.
The council decided to suspend
Craijevanger from preaching and other duties until he provided satisfaction for his actions. His salary and benefits were also suspended. The decision was signed by
Francoijs Prins,
Hendrik Caes,
Hendrik Steenkop,
M.B. Suring, and
Ioannes Suuus.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1535 / 0598
1693-05-06,
Macassar: A complaint was filed by
N. Craijevanger, a preacher, against
Jan Ferdinandus,
Baesheijn, and
Baesheijn's wife, including
Lucretia, as well as the
Church Council and
Captain and his wife.
- Jan Ferdinandus showed disrespect towards the sacraments, the word, and the preacher. When asked for reasons, he initially remained silent but later accused Craijevanger of:
- Not inviting him and his family to services.
- Abandoning his duties for four weeks.
- Calling him a rogue in front of his house.
- Threatening to slap him for turning his hat around disrespectfully when visiting Jan Ferdinandus.
- Craijevanger defended himself, stating:
- Craijevanger accused Jan Ferdinandus, Baesheijn, and others of disrespecting him, the Church Council, and their roles, using abusive language.
- Craijevanger requested that the authorities take action to maintain the dignity of the church and the Church Council, and appoint a suitable elder to the Church Council.
1693-01-09,
Macassar:
N. Craijevanger signed the complaint.
The authorities reviewed the complaint and found that
Craijevanger's request and previous actions were irregular and full of passion, unbecoming of a person of his character. They noted several issues, including:
- He tried to compel the political council of the castle to legally forbid the administrator of the region from the church.
- He involved Cornelis Brugman, a merchant and member of the Council of Justice of the castle, as well as an elder.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1535 / 0596
On
6 May 1693, a letter from
Macassar mentioned a persistent issue that had left the writer at a loss for words due to the reckless behavior of certain individuals. A document signed by
Craijevanger on
14 January 1693 at 8 AM described a political meeting held with all members present except
Ebeconde H. Collaert and
Hend. K. Berghuijse.
During the meeting, a request from
Predicant N. Craijevanger was presented by the court's messenger. The request detailed several grievances:
- Captain and his wife had long ignored religious duties, such as attending communion and listening to God's word, showing great disrespect to the church community. When questioned by an elder and deacon, they dismissed the concerns, claiming they attended church only to kiss and do nothing else.
- On 6 January 1693, Baes and his wife also failed to attend church or listen to the preacher for three months, acting as if they were free from any rules or discipline.
- On 5 January 1693, the Captain and his wife were summoned by the church council but refused to respond. The Captain even mocked the preacher, calling his work "boys' work" and confirming it, saying he had only been there for two years and should be tolerated.
- Craijevanger asked Baes Jan and Jan Ferdinandus to convey that since they did not recognize him as a preacher or head of church discipline, he could not recognize them as church members. Jan Ferdinandus refused, still not fully acknowledging Craijevanger's authority.
- Holscher, his wife, and Lucretia also refused to appear without a formal citation, despite knowing they had not attended church or communion for three months. Craijevanger explained that citations were for legal matters, not church discipline, but Holscher responded harshly, filling his cap with excuses.
Craijevanger warned of the decline of the church and the offensive disrespect shown.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1535 / 0594
Translations of the king's letters are now being handled. The main issue concerns the murder of the queen of Dompo and the accusations against the Radja of Bima. The ships in Macassar have not yet been loaded for this reason.
Since the last report, translations of letters from the Radjas of Bonij and Goa, as well as from the allied partners, and the kings of Bima, Dompo, and Tambara, along with a letter from the leaders and community of Bina, have been completed. Copies of these are now being sent with the next quarterly shipment from Macassar to the Honorable Highness.
The main content, except for the letter from Tambora, involves the accusation by the Radja of Dompo against the Radja of Bima regarding the murder of the former's wife. They will soon address this matter. The chief merchant Schenkens has been transferred from Ambon to Macassar as a replacement.
They wish these matters were clearer to address the legal and satisfaction aspects for the allies. They will soon handle these and other Macassar affairs with the necessary attention.
Regarding the continuation of the president Francoijs Prins and the request of the preacher Ernestus de Witte to go to Macassar, this was already mentioned in the last report. Since then, they have decided to transfer the chief merchant Matheus van Schenkenberg from Amboina to Macassar to fill the vacancy left by the departure of the merchant Hendrick Collaart.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1523 / 0214
1244 A copy for
Jan Basson and
Pieter Loret about a captured slave,
Louis van Bengalen. A recorded statement from the Honorable Council of Justice (
E. agtb: raad van Justitie) of this government, the citizen
Jurgen Jansz: Schoeman, who answered questions as noted in the margin, heard and questioned by the Landdrost
Pieter Lourensz.
Jurgen Jansz: Schoeman, born in
Meldorp,
Holstein, aged 32, living at
Drakensteijn, appeared before the court. He was asked if in
December 1739, 7 of his slaves named
Jan,
Lowies,
Andries,
Biera,
Batjoe,
Anthonij, and
Julij ran away from his place at
de Vleesbank across the
Berg River.
He was asked if he, with citizens
Jan Basson and
Louis Nel, went to look for the slaves. He replied he did not remember but if he did, it was in haste. He confirmed
Louis Nel stayed there. He admitted he had the slaves beaten. He had them tied to a ladder and beaten by his slave
Baatjoe.
He was asked if he took a stick from the shepherd
Anthonij and hit the slave
Julij with it.
Jan Basson told him not to hit the young slave with a stick but with a sjambok (whip). He denied hitting
Julij with a stick.
He was asked if he, with
Louis Nel and the slaves, went to his house, driving the young slaves before the horse. He confirmed. He was asked if
Jan Basson and
Pieter Loret found and asked to take the runaway and captured young slaves. He confirmed.
He was asked if he, upon arriving home, got a ladder and hung the slaves
Jan,
Louis,
Andries,
Biera, and
Julij in a room of his house by their hands with a rope to a beam, so their feet barely touched the ground. He confirmed but said their feet could reach the ground.
He was asked if
Louis Nel and his slaves
Baatjoe and
Anthonij helped him beat the slaves. He confirmed. He was asked if he then treated and beat the other slaves in the same way. He confirmed.
He was asked if he beat the slave with a sjambok all over the body 43 times and then tied him up. He was asked if he had the slave's pants, coat, shirt taken off. He referred to previous answers.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 4146 / 0355
1740
- A copy of the register of all documents submitted to the Council of Justice of Casteel de Goede Hoop in the case of Mr. Daniel van den Henghel, fiscal for Eijssel (appellant), against citizen Johannes Leij (appellee).
- The documents, including minutes, were certified and bundled to be handed over in case of appeal to Mr. Jacob Lakeman, president of the Council of Justice of Casteel Batavia, and other members of that council.
- The bundle begins with minutes from 19 May 1740, when the fiscal initially filed the case against Johannes Leij.
- Original documents include:
- Copies of minutes:
- From 2 June 1740, when Johannes Leij responded.
- From 4 August 1740, when the fiscal requested to pursue his appeal regarding the first part of the pending judgment before the Council of Justice of Casteel Batavia.
- From 7 July 1740, when the defendant duplicated his response.
- From 16 June 1740, when the fiscal replicated his argument.
- Original documents from Johannes Leij and Eijssel, along with conclusions.
- A copy of the verdict issued on 21 July 1740 and pronounced on 28 July 1740, annexed under Eijssel's appeal.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 4146 / 0335
On
19 August 1740, in
Casteel de Goede Hoop, officials
C. Brand and
J. C. Dewet registered and recorded a document, with
D. G. Carnspek as secretary.
Pieter Lourensz, acting as
Landdrost, filed a case against citizens
Jurgen Jansz Schoeman and
Louis Nel. The case involved 5 slaves owned by
Jurgen Jansz Schoeman who were allegedly beaten so severely that one,
Julij, died.
Jurgen Jansz Schoeman claimed
Julij died after hitting his head on a spear hook. However, an investigation by officials and surgeon
Wijnand Louw found that
Julij had no fatal wounds. Further statements from slaves
Jan van de Kust,
Biera van Malabaar, and
Louis van Bengaalen revealed that the 7 slaves (
Jan,
Andries,
Biera,
Louis,
Batjoe,
Anthonij, and
Julij) had tried to complain about poor food and clothing.
They were intercepted by
Jurgen Jansz Schoeman and citizens
Jan Basson and
Pieter Loret near
Bergh River. The slaves were tied together, and
Jurgen Jansz Schoeman took a stick from
Anthonij to beat
Julij.
Jan Basson stopped him, suggesting a whip instead. The slaves were then taken to
Jan Basson's place, where
Jurgen Jansz Schoeman and
Louis Nel (who was called to help) beat them with a whip.
Batjoe also participated.
Later, at
Jurgen Jansz Schoeman's home near
Vleesch Bank, the slaves were stripped and beaten again.
Batjoe and
Anthonij were pardoned, but the other 5 were tied to a beam in a room, their hands bound, and left hanging so their feet barely touched the ground.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 4146 / 0337
On
28 December 1739, officials from
Draakenstijn went to the
Vliesbank at the home of citizen
Jurgen Jansz Schoeman after a request by
Pieter Lourensz, the local
Landdrost. They examined an enslaved person named
Julij, owned by
Jurgen Jansz Schoeman, who was said to have died after hitting his head against a spear hook.
Julij had been buried by
Schoeman, so the officials had the body dug up.
They questioned other enslaved people—
Jan,
Louis,
Andries,
Biera,
Batjoe, and
Anthonij—all owned by
Schoeman. The enslaved people said that they had left their master’s place and were later caught near
Burgersdrift by
Schoeman and citizen
Jan Basson.
Schoeman tied them in pairs, made them run in front of horses, and hit them with a stick.
Basson took the stick from
Schoeman and said, “You must not hit the boys with a stick, but with a sjambok (whip).”
Back at
Schoeman’s place, he tied 5 of the 12 enslaved people—
Jan,
Louis,
Andries,
Biera, and
Julij—to a leather strap and had them whipped with sjamboks. Then, he hung them by their ribs from a beam in a room so their feet could not touch the ground. Soon after,
Julij called out, “Master! I can’t take it anymore!”
Schoeman then let
Julij down, but
Julij immediately fell to the ground dead.
Schoeman admitted this was true, except he claimed the enslaved people’s feet could not reach the ground.
A surgeon examined
Julij’s body and found no fatal wounds, but the officials saw that both
Julij’s body and the other 4 enslaved people had been beaten.
The report was signed by
Charl Marais and
P. S Boijens in
Draakenstijn on
30 December 1739.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 4146 / 0343
On
16 March 1740, at the
Cape of Good Hope, a slave named
Lowies van Bengalen testified about events involving his master
Jurgen Jansz: Schoeman, another citizen
Lowies Nel, and several slaves:
Jan,
Batjoe,
Anthonij, and
Julij.
- At a place called Basson, Lowies Nel left after smoking a pipe of tobacco with Jurgen Jansz: Schoeman. Schoeman then tied Jan to a post, stripped him, and beat him with a sjambok (whip). Lowies Nel and Batjoe also hit Jan. Later, Schoeman tied up Jan and other slaves (except Batjoe and Anthonij) and beat them with help from Lowies Nel.
- Schoeman then took Jan and four other slaves into a room, tied their hands, and hung them from a beam so their feet barely touched the ground. He then placed a small table under Jan, pulled it away, and left him hanging. He did the same to the other four slaves.
- Schoeman's wife entered and told him to release the slaves. Julij was untied first but collapsed, and Jan said, "Julij is dead." Schoeman denied it, untied the others, and dragged Julij's body. He sent a woman named Sara to fetch burning wood, which he held under Julij's nose, but Julij did not move. Anthonij and Batjoe were ordered to bury Julij near the house, which they did the next morning.
- In February 1740, Jan returned from Cust (likely Cape Town). On a Sunday morning, Schoeman asked Jan why he wasn’t working and hit him. Jan ran away but returned. Schoeman then ordered Batjoe to tie Jan up, but Jan fled again. Schoeman shot at Jan, chased him on horseback, and caught him. He tied Jan's hands and took him toward Stellenbosch. Schoeman returned alone and claimed Jan had escaped into the bushes after asking to loosen his pants.
The testimony was recorded at the
Castle of Good Hope in the presence of clerks
Adriaan van Schoor and
Hendrik Emanuel Blanckenberg.
Lowies van Bengalen confirmed his statement in the presence of his master
Jurgen Jansz: Schoeman and
Lowies Nel. The document was signed by judges
P:r R: de Savoije and
Jacob de Hennion, along with the clerk
D. G. Carnspek.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 4146 / 0352
On
3 December 1739,
Wijnand Louw received a statement from surgeon
B Huijden on
4 February 1740. The slave
Jan van de Cust Cormandel, owned by farmer
Jurgen Jansz Schoeman, appeared before
Daniel Godfried Carnspek, secretary of the honorable Justice Council of
Castle de Goede Hoop, along with witnesses.
Jan stated that in December
1739, he and six other slaves—
Lowies van Bengalen,
Andries and
Biera van Mallabaar,
Baatjoe van Boegis,
Anthonij van Ternaten, and
Julij van Couchin—left their master’s place to go to
the Cape to complain about not receiving proper food or clothing.
Near
Burgers Drift, their master, along with
Jan Basson and
Lowies Nel, caught them. Their master took a whip from
Anthonij, the sheep herder, and hit
Julij.
Jan Basson said, "That’s not right, you must hit the boy with a sjambok, not a whip." The master then hit
Jan and the others (except
Baatjoe) with the sjambok.
Their master tied
Jan,
Anthonij, and
Biera together in pairs, and the others two by two. He made them run in front of his horse while he,
Jan Basson, and
Lowies Nel rode behind. After about a pipe’s worth of tobacco smoking,
Jan Basson and
Lowies Nel left, but
Jan and the others kept running until they reached home.
Once home, their master ordered
Jan to take off his coat, shirt, and pants, then tied him to a rack and beat him with a sjambok.
Lowies Nel and
Baatjoe also hit him. The other slaves were tied and beaten the same way, except
Baatjoe and
Anthonij.
Then,
Jan and four others were taken to a room in their master’s house. Their hands were tied with a rope, and they were hung from a beam so their feet barely touched the ground.
Lowies Nel left, and their master went outside and came back with a small table. He made
Jan stand on it, then pulled the rope tighter until the table was removed, leaving
Jan hanging so his feet couldn’t touch the ground. The same was done to the other four slaves.
Their master’s wife came in and said, "Let the boys go." Their master first untied
Julij, who fell to the ground, lifeless.
Jan and the others, still hanging, said, "Master, Julij is dead." Their master replied, "How can he be dead? He’s still alive." He then untied
Jan and the others.
Julij remained motionless on the ground, so their master dragged him around and ordered a
Hottentot woman,
Sara, to bring a piece of burning wood. He held it under
Julij’s nose, but there was no movement.
Their master then ordered
Anthonij and
Baatjoe to take
Julij outside to the slave house and bury him somewhere nearby. The next morning, they wrapped
Julij in a cloth and buried him not far from the house.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 4146 / 0347
On
15 March 1740, at the
Casteel de Goede Hoop,
Biera van Mallabaar, a slave, testified about the abuse he and other slaves endured at the hands of their master,
Lijsheer, and his wife,
Lijfvrouw.
- Lijsheer tied Biera and other slaves to his horse and made them run while he rode with Jan Basson and Lowies Nel until they reached Basson's place. After a short break, they were forced to run again until they reached home.
- Upon arrival, Lijsheer tied Biera to a leather strap, stripped him, and beat him with a sjambok (whip). Lowies Nel and another slave, Batjoe, assisted in the beating. Other slaves were also tied and beaten, except for Batjoe and Anthonij.
- Lijsheer then took Biera and four other slaves into a room, tied their hands together, and hung them from a beam so their feet barely touched the ground. Lowies Nel left after this.
- Lijsheer later returned, placed a small table under Biera, and pulled the rope tighter, causing Biera to hang completely. He did the same to the other four slaves.
- Lijfvrouw entered and told Lijsheer to release the slaves. Lijsheer had already untied one slave, Julij, who fell to the ground, apparently dead. When Jan (another slave) said Julij was dead, Lijsheer denied it, but eventually released the remaining slaves.
- Lijsheer tried to revive Julij with burning wood under his nose, but it didn’t work. He then ordered Anthonij and Batjoe to take Julij to the slave house and bury him, which they did. The next morning, Julij was found wrapped in a cloth and buried near the house.
On
16 March 1740,
Biera van Mallabaar confirmed his testimony, adding that
Lowies Nel was not involved in their capture at
Burgers Drift but had joined them later at
Jan Basson's house.
On an unspecified date in December of the previous year,
Lowies van Bengalen, a slave belonging to
Jurgen Jansz: Schoeman, testified that he and six other slaves, including
Biera van Mallabaar,
Jan van de Cust,
Andries,
Batjoe van Boegis,
Anthonij van Ternaten, and
Julij van Couchin, had left their master's place to go to the
Caab to complain about lack of food and clothing.
At
Burgers Drift, their master and
Jan Basson caught up with them on horseback. Their master took a stick from
Anthonij (a sheep herder) and hit
Julij.
Jan Basson told the master to use a sjambok instead, which he did, and then beat all the slaves except
Batjoe. The master then tied the slaves in pairs (
Lowies to
Julij,
Anthonij to
Jan,
Biera to
Andries, and
Batjoe to someone else) and made them run in front of his horse while he rode with
Jan Basson.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 4146 / 0350
- It was decided to keep 2 or more ships with some yachts in Banda for known reasons, to control the Bandanese. His Lordship should pay special attention to this.
- Due to a truce with the Spaniards, His Excellency stayed in Ternate. Ships could not reach Banda before October.
- A general warehouse and Molucos should be built in the most convenient place. Maqmian was too unsafe due to the forts, but Nostaquia was a good location. Costs should not be spared for such necessary work.
- Workers could be used for reasonable wages to make lime and other tasks. In Banda, good progress had been made on a fort, with the fourth part of the work on a bastion wall done, but it still lacked a parapet. Completing the fort would save annual repair costs.
- The Maqmian people needed rest, especially from work in Ternate. Enough had been done to fortify and repair in Maqmian. Now, a break was needed to prevent exhaustion.
- A large number of people in Ternate were not properly organized for work or food. They could be pressed to fortify the captured Portuguese fort near Samisuma, a strategically good location. A general warehouse could also be built there.
- Good locations and forts were available, and trade was expected to increase from Grite, Macassar, Jacatra, Taliabo, and Japan.
- Cayoers, Gauers, and Bachianen should be treated kindly to strengthen their loyalty. Good rice was available, so they should be given some, as they would likely pay it back. This could also attract Tidoresen, Cnuuwers, and other roving traders, especially since the Spaniards were weakened.
- A previous letter suggested sending the ship Lieff to Bantam and then to the Philippines, but the situation in Banda required it to sail there instead. It was advised to send Lieff and 2 yachts to Banda after Lieff completed its voyage to Benfara, Massi, and Sambas. One yacht should also go to Japan.
- The sloop Cleijn der vills could be used for the Bornersche voyage, and der Goes for the Coromandelsche coast. The yachts should be used in Banda unless some were sent to Ternate with provisions, which was highly necessary.
- It was hoped that the Roden Leeuw met Pijlen would bring good provisions from Japan at a reasonable price.
- Great joy was expressed over gaining Banda. To save time, provisions brought by the Roden Leeuw met Pijlen for Banda should be kept for that purpose, as the ship was designed for long voyages and already had a stock of food.
- It was requested that the provisions not be misused. If any were taken, it should be for the yachts Paeut and Griffioen, as their crews needed to be fed like those on large ships.
- It was wished that all leaders coming to the Indies were blessed with a generous nature.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1053 / 0428
On
9 January 1681,
Simon Jansz Hoen, the Vice Admiral, and particularly
Amirael P. Van Caerden had written to the honorable and wise lords about the shortage of supplies in the
Moluccas. They had not received any supplies, especially ships and yachts.
On
13 July 1610,
Amirael van Caerden was traveling from
Malaya to
Macquian with the yacht
De Goede Hope. He was attacked by a Spanish galleon, a frigate, and a
Tidor Corra Corra. After a fight of about three hours, they were promised good quarters, but this was not the case. The Spanish took
Amirael with his crew and yacht to their city near
Ternate. On
18 August, a Spanish envoy came to
Malaya with a peace offer. They requested that some of the Dutch be sent to
Gamollammo to negotiate the ransom and the release of the prisoners with the
maestro de Campo.
Cornelis Lenaertsen and
Christiaen den Dorst were sent, but the
maestro de Campo's demand was too high, at least 40,000
Real of 8.
On
27 July,
Cornelis Levertsz was sent to
Menado with his ship to buy as much rice as possible. On
3 August, a ship with supplies for the Spanish and the prisoners in
Manila arrived in front of the Spanish
Ternate. On
15 August, 200
Real of 8 were sent to
Manila to aid the prisoners.
On
16 September, the ship
Middelb arrived in
Malaya from
Menado with about 1,000
padi or unhusked rice, which was less than hoped. The ship was sent to
Bangay or
Xula to wait for rice and sago. However, due to contrary winds, currents, and droughts, it was not advisable. The only remaining option was the yacht
De Jager. They armed
De Jager in
Macquian to resist the Spanish galleons and frigate.
On
25 September,
Cornelis Levertsz,
Capn. Adriaen Wautersz, and others left for
Batsian with
De Jager. On
8 October, they returned to
Nofaguia and found two
Jabaensc junks loaded with rice and sago, which they bought for the forts in
Macquian. They loaded most of the sago onto
De Jager to transport to
Malaya. On
12 October, they arrived in
Malaya and started unloading, with about 4,000 sacks of sago unloaded on the same day.
That night, the enemy with galleons and six
Tydorosche Corrocorren arrived near
Malaya and attacked
De Jager. After a fierce fight, the yacht exploded due to its own gunpowder. The skipper, helmsman, constable, and nine others were captured by the enemy, and thirteen were brought to
Malaya, some of whom died from burns. The enemy then attacked
Malaya by land but were repelled.
On
13 November, another
Malaysche junk from
Zula arrived in
Nofaguia with sago, which they all bought. The ship
Middelb was loaded with 30,000
tocq for the forts
Malaya and
Wilmstadt. On
25 November, it sailed to
Malaya to pick up the nails that were there, then returned to
Macquian or
Nofaguia to pick up the remaining cargo from the three junks. This was considered a great stroke of luck, even though the sago and rice had to be bought at a high price, causing some trouble with the inhabitants of
Macquian and
Ternate.
The forts now have some rice and sago, but little else. They hope to manage for about five months, after which everything will have to be rationed.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1053 / 0973
In
1676,
camer was appointed as
coopman and
opperhooft in
Colombo with a salary of 60. In
1689,
d' zion was appointed as
ondercoopman and
secunde in
Delft with a salary of 40.
In
1664,
tsbot van koningen was appointed as
ondercoopman and
secunde in
Rotterdam with a salary of 40.
In
1667,
d' gerechtigheijt was appointed as
ondercoopman and
secunde in
Amsterdam with a salary of 40.
In
1687,
d' Leck was appointed as
ondercoopman and
secunde in
Amsterdam with a salary of 40.
In
1670,
tw: van rotterdam was appointed as
ondercoopman and
secunde in
Rotterdam with a salary of 40.
In
1655,
mallacca was appointed as
p:l vaandrich in
Amsterdam with a salary of 20.
In
1674,
d' pijnacker was appointed as
boechouder in
Amsterdam with a salary of 30.
In
1672,
wimmenum was appointed as
dsistent with a salary of 24.
In
1680, someone was appointed as
Soechouder in
Palliacatta with a salary of 30.
In
1672, someone was appointed as
ranckbesoecker in
Ternaten with a salary of 30.
In
1679,
w: van alcmaar was appointed as
psistent with a salary of 20.
In
1682, someone was appointed in
Jaffenap with a salary of 24.
In
1671, someone was appointed as
oldaat in
Palliacatta with a salary of 12.
In
1677, someone was appointed as
osschieter with a salary of 12.
In
1690, someone was appointed as
oldaat with a salary of 16.
In
1686, someone was appointed as
adsistent with a salary of 20.
In
1686, someone was appointed in
Oosterlant with a salary of 12.
In
1686, someone was appointed in
Zeelant with a salary of 12.
In
1690, someone was appointed as
boechouder in
Nagapatnam with a salary of 32.
In
1665, someone was appointed as
coopman in
Amsterdam with a salary of 60.
In
1680, someone was appointed as
adsistent in
Amsterdam with a salary of 12.
In
1685,
w=m hendrick was appointed as
adsistent en secunde in
Zeelant with a salary of 24.
In
1687, someone was appointed as
boechouder en opperhooft in
Nagapatnam with a salary of 32.
In
1669,
d' barm was appointed as
coopman en opperhooft in
Rotterdam with a salary of 60.
In
1676,
Jappan was appointed as
boeckn en p:r secunde with a salary of 30.
In
1676,
coevorden was appointed as
adsistent in
Amsterdam with a salary of 20.
In
1684, someone was appointed as
boechouder in
Battio with a salary of 30.
In
1679,
poeleron was appointed as
boss: bij d' pen in
Delft with a salary of 12.
In
1690, someone was appointed in
Palliacatta with a salary of 14.
In
1675, someone was appointed in
Amsterdam.
- 496 and 15 people transported.
- Names, surnames, and birthplaces:
- In 1659, Gijsbert Abrahamsz: d'goijer from Amsterdam was a schoolmeester with a salary of 15 in Westeramstel.
- In 1682, Ian Wallis from Palliacatta was a soldaat with a salary of 9.
- In 1685, Marten Sijmonsz: Croeger from Jeveren was a kuijper with a salary of 17 in Waterlant.
- In 1687, Hendrick Merckman from Amsterdam was a schrijver with a salary of 12 in 'slands welvaren.
- In 1690, Gerrit Boech from Den Briel was a soldaat with a salary of 10 in Goudesteijn.
- In 1658, Pieter Amphius from Bergen in Noorwegen was a Corporaal with a salary of 16 in tw: van Amsterdam.
- In 1687, Anthonij Derosairo from Palliacatta was a soldaat with a salary of 11.
- In 1682, Domingo Derosairo from Palliacatta was a soldaat with a salary of 13.
- In 1675, Claas Andriesz: Vandram was a soldaat with a salary of 14 in Swartsluijs.
In
1678, someone was appointed as
rap:n des armes in
Europa with a salary of 30.
In
1685, someone was appointed as
hirurgijn in
Amsterdam with a salary of 32.
In
1683, someone was appointed in
Amsterdam with a salary of 20.
In
1655,
Sergoes was appointed in
Zeelant with a salary of 24.
In
1650,
d' walvis was appointed in
Amsterdam with a salary of 16.
In
1656, someone was appointed in
Aarnhem with a salary of 16.
In
1669,
'tstickt uijtregt was appointed in
Amsterdam with a salary of 16.
In
1684,
d'vrijheijt was appointed in
Zeelant with a salary of 14.
In
1665, someone was appointed in
Amsterdam with a salary of 14.
In
1677, someone was appointed in
Amsterdam with a salary of 14.
In
1666, someone was appointed in
Palliacatta with a salary of 14.
In
1665, someone was appointed in
Rijnland with a salary of 14.
In
1666, someone was appointed in
Duijnvliet with a salary of 12.
In
1676, someone was appointed in
Amsterdam with a salary of 14.
In
1682, someone was appointed in
Amsterdam with a salary of 11.
In
1679, someone was appointed with a salary of 13.
In
1669,
tw: van Z: Zee was appointed in
Zeelant with a salary of 14.
In
1680, someone was appointed in
Java with a salary of 13.
In
1687, someone was appointed in
Amsterdam with a salary of 11.
In
1684, someone was appointed in
Amsterdam.
In
1669,
Hendrick Roelofsz: from
Hamburgh was a ronstapelsmaat with a salary of 18 in
wtm. hendrick in
Zeelant.
In
1677,
Ian Abrahamsz: Willicx from
Zutphen was a corporaal with a salary of 16 in
N: middelburgh in
Zeelant.
In
1661,
Bastiaan Iansz: from
Amsterdam was a soldaat with a salary of 15 in
Hilversum in
Amsterdam.
In
1670,
Pieter Passenier from
Oostkappel was a corporaal with a salary of 16 in
sw: vander veer in
Zeelant.
In
1689,
Enog Woutersz: from
Palliacatta was an amboer with a salary of 9.
In
1665,
Hendrick Meijndertsz: from
Ieveren was a soldaat with a salary of 14 in
N: Rotterdam.
In
1673,
Paulus Ieger from
Spiers was a soldaat with a salary of 14 in
Kassenburgh.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1526 / 0928
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1526 / 0913
In
Nagapatnam, the following military personnel were stationed:
- From the Bugis: 91 soldiers and 103 porters.
- From the Ambonese:
- From the Topass:
Additionally, there were:
- From the Bugis: 74 porters for transport and 848 people transported.
- From the Ambonese: 12 porters for transport.
- From the Topass: 37 porters for transport, 82 people transported, and 124 people for transport duties.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1526 / 0931
On 17 September 1722, in the city of Cochim, the writer trusted the English but not the French. The French had received 50 men and had become arrogant because of it.
Another report by Domingos Rebello, dated the same as the previous one, confirmed the conflicts between the Portuguese and the English. It also confirmed the truth about the capture of a ship from the chief of Coudewaar, loaded with horses. Additionally, the Portuguese had captured a vessel coming from Bombahia with weapons intended for Soudewaar. The Portuguese in Bombahia, in the settlements of the English, were killing people there. The English were in the settlements of the Portuguese, but the latter always had the upper hand.
It was said that someone from Bombahia had been sent to Goa to negotiate peace. Angrea had offered the Portuguese to take Bombahia and give it to her.
On 19 September 1722, Thursday before noon, Paradoertij Ittij macodda, the ragiadoor, came from Tritsjoer to the Commander. He was sent by the new king of Cochim to meet His Excellency on behalf of his highness and to pay a visit. This was answered with courtesy and civility. The ragiadoor then delivered his message, stating that his highness was very upset that His Excellency had not sent anyone to him since the death of the previously deceased king, so for about 45 days.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 10332 / 0142
On
29 June 1660, aboard the ship
de Mars anchored near
Macassar, the crew noticed divine favor. Two of their residents, who had stayed in
the Company's house in
Macassar, had safely returned. Only one sailor remained ashore, whom they hoped to retrieve the next morning with God's will.
They discussed how to handle the situation to advance
the Company's interests without harming their main mission. On one hand, they had orders not to engage in hostile acts against
Macassar before declaring war. On the other, they felt duty-bound to seize opportunities that could benefit
the Company and weaken the enemy.
After careful consideration, they decided to:
- Follow the general order to declare war on Macassar properly, without any prior show of force against the city or its people.
- If the remaining man in the Company's house in Macassar did not return, they would still attack the enemy Portuguese ships at dawn the next day, 30 June 1660, with courage, aiming to capture or destroy them as war and God's will allowed. This would prevent the ships from escaping or saving their valuable cargoes.
They also considered that the King of
Macassar would have no reason to be upset about this.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1232 / 0665
In
1621,
Gabriel de Matos, a member of the
Society of Jesus, wrote from
Macao about a dispute over land ownership.
The
Mandarins (Chinese officials) had ordered the destruction of buildings on a piece of land, claiming it was unfairly occupied by
Portuguese merchants.
The merchants had invested heavily in these structures, and the
Mandarins had previously approved their construction.
Gabriel de Matos argued that the land in question was not owned by the
Portuguese but was part of
China, and the
Mandarins had the right to govern it.
He protested that the
Portuguese should be allowed to use the land for trade, as it benefited both
China and
Portugal.
He requested that the
Portuguese authorities in
Macao support their right to use the land for trade fairs, both present and future.
On
18 May 1621, the city council of
Macao responded, stating that according to Chinese law, no one could own land without official permission.
They confirmed that the land was indeed under Chinese rule and that the
Mandarins had the authority to decide its use.
The council agreed that the
Portuguese could use the land for trade, as long as they followed Chinese regulations.
They also agreed to provide official copies of the protest and response to
Gabriel de Matos for use in legal proceedings.
On
20 May 1621,
Diogo de Carvalho,
Rodrigo Sanches de Paredes,
António do Livramento, and
Gonçalo Teixeira Correia signed the response.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1076 / 0205
Next page