Transcriptions » Recently generated summaries of recognized texts

Fully AI-GeneratedUsers of Open Archives can have summaries generated from the recognized texts (transcriptions) produced through text recognition (OCR) and handwriting recognition (HTR). Neither of these artificial intelligence tasks is perfect, but they are often more than sufficient to make the historical document understandable. In the transcripts, names are underlined in green and clickable (to search the personal entries on Open Archives for the name in question), the recognized dates have a light gray background and recognized place names have a light purple background. The results of the application of (European) artificial intelligence have not been verified by a human.


On 26 July 1780, in Paramaribo, Johanna Adolph van Claveren, clerk of the colony of Suriname, Pivieren, Berkhffz, and its districts, appeared before the notary. In the presence of witnesses, Eliazer David Cohen, residing in Paramaribo, declared to appoint and authorize Trestolene Croesgsdoordenstegits as his representative. This representative was to act on his behalf, defend his rights and interests, and handle legal procedures, including a case of revision before Their High Mightinesses. The case involved Johanna Adolph van Claveren as the defendant in convention and plaintiff in reconvention against Ein: Wilkens, who acted as the attorney and proxy of Daniel Salomon van Rotterdam, plaintiff in convention and defendant in reconvention. The representative was authorized to employ necessary legal practitioners, appear before Their High Mightinesses or any other court they might choose, attend all days and terms, make requests, and perform all actions deemed necessary. Additionally, the representative could request judgments, hear them pronounced, enforce them, and do everything else that Johanna Adolph van Claveren could do if present in person. Eliazer David Cohen promised to approve and uphold everything done by the representative as valid and true.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 577 / 0123  


An agreement was made in the presence of the community of Conthoraalen members. The parties involved accepted the prenuptial conditions completely. To ensure compliance, each party pledged their persons and property, submitting them to all courts and judges, specifically to the Honorable Courts of Civil Justice of the colony of Paramaribo.

This was done in Paramaribo on 59 in the presence of Iacobus Dieulafit and Otto Frederich Seewich as requested witnesses. The document was signed by Wlren 77 Dieulefit Levy, JF: Segvect, Nan Claveren, and Gesw: Clercq.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 126 / 0071  


In the event of a separation, any amount taken by the bride from the shared estate beyond her initial contribution will be treated as a preferred debt. The groom or his heirs will first receive from the general estate an amount equal to what the bride took for her daughter. After this, both parties will receive their original contributions and any additional profits earned in the partnership, provided all transactions are properly documented. If the bride wishes to advance the career of her previously mentioned underage son, with the approval of his guardian, and this incurs significant expenses, the groom will be required to cover these costs to the extent of the paternal inheritance promised to the bride's son. If the costs exceed this inheritance, the groom or his heirs will receive from the general estate an amount equal to what the son received beyond his inheritance. Goods brought into the marriage by either party, such as linens, bedding, copper, tin, and any items not listed in the inventory, will be shared in the partnership. Exceptions are personal clothing and linens: the groom's male clothing and linens will belong to him or his heirs, and the bride's female clothing and linens will belong to her or her heirs. Upon division of the estate after the return of the underage party's capital, each partner will receive their original contribution along with any profits or losses.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 126 / 0069  


View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 126 / 0067  


Johannes Adolph van Claveren, a sworn clerk at the secretariat of the Colony of Suriname, Rivers and Districts, recorded on 31 August 1723 in Paramaribo that Eliazer David Cohen, a widower, and Beletie van Norden, widow of the late Iacob Levij, both of the German Jewish nation, declared their intention to marry within a month according to local laws and Jewish customs. They agreed to the following conditions:
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 126 / 0065  


At a meeting, the request of Daniel Salomons van Notterdar, residing in Amsterdam, was read. He asked for a royal order of Nevse regarding a sentence from the Court of Suriname dated 21 April 1780. The sentence was in the case of Unico Wekens against Eliazer de David Cohen. The court decided against Eliazer de David Cohen with an injunction clause. After deliberation, it was decided to issue the requested royal order of Keirse against Eliazer de David Cohen with the injunction clause in the proper form.

At the meeting, the request of Anthonij Joseph Boraval, residing in the colony of Essequebo, was also read. He stated that on 15 November 1780, he was forced to initiate legal proceedings. He requested a royal order with a clause of grace and injunction, as well as a civil request with a writ to the High Mightinesses. This was against Hendrik Milborr, council of the aforementioned colony, and Daood Dancel Chanqui, a merchant in Amsterdam. They were acting as guardians over the underage heirs and executors of the estate of the late Jan Baphst Struys, who had lived and died in the aforementioned colony. The case had progressed to the point where a conclusion for a declaratory judgment and response to the civil request had been drawn up by the requester. This was submitted by appointment of the High Mightinesses on 13 October 1780 and served to the other party by the chamber warden J. S. Dandell on 18 October 1780. However, the other party failed to reply to the conclusion for a declaratory judgment and response to the civil request. Therefore, the requester asked for an appointment by which the other party would be ordered to still reply to the aforementioned conclusion, under penalty of default, with the possibility of purging within 3 weeks after notification. After deliberation, it was decided to order the other party by appointment to still reply to the aforementioned conclusion of declaratory judgment and response to the civil request within 3 weeks after notification of this, under penalty of default.

At the meeting, the request of Johan Gustav Bekreken, residing in Paramaribo, was read. He acted as guardian and stepfather over the underage children, dated 15 November 1780.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.01.02 / 1548 / 0081  


In the presence of witnesses, the parties involved declared they had the authority to act, even if a more specific power of attorney was required. They promised to uphold all actions taken by Caveren Gesw: Clercq, who was authorized to act on their behalf, including the power to substitute in legal matters.

The document was signed in Paramaribo on 1782-09-01 in the presence of witnesses Moses de Samuel Robles de Medina, D=bd Fernandes, and Iacob Juda Junior. Additional notes include the mention of Isaac Emanuets as a guardian and a reference to Loupanande P Handalaveren SCS in 1784.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 579 / 0091  


View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 579 / 0089  


On 5 August 1782, before Johannes Adolph van Claveren, sworn clerk of the colony of Suriname and its rivers and districts, appeared the witnesses. The gentlemen Jacob Iuda Junior and Isaac Emanuels, orphan masters of the High German Jewish Nation, representing the estate of the late Eliazer David Cohen, residing in Paramaribo, declared that the aforementioned Eliazer David Cohen had been summoned by U. Wilkens, as authorized representative of Daniel Salomons from Rotterdam, before the Honorable Court of Civil Justice of this colony. Cohen had been acquitted by sentence of 27 April 1730, but the opposing party had lodged an appeal. On 26 July 1780, Cohen had passed a blank power of attorney, or with the name of the constituent left open, before the sworn clerk and witnesses. The original was then sent to the fatherland to use it, if possible, to prevent the revision mandate obtained by the opposing party from Her High Mightiness with an inhibition clause. Since these papers likely fell into the hands of enemies and thus did not reach their address, the appearing gentlemen declared to first revoke and annul the aforementioned blank power of attorney. Furthermore, they requested to newly appoint and authorize the Honorable Mr. Hendrik Justus Witte van Oldenbarneveld, also known as Tullingh, as advocate, and Matthijs Hendrik van Son Hendriksz as prosecutor, both practicing before Her High Mightiness the Lords States General.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 579 / 0087  


On 4 December 1781, Welco Pieter Wilkens, a provisional clerk of the colony of Suriname and its rivers and districts, assisted by witnesses, went to the death house Berkhof at the request of Jacob Juida Junior and Jsac Emanuel, guardians of the High German Jewish Nation.

They examined the seals on a document dated 27 November 1781, created by Alexander Salomons, clerk of the aforementioned court. The seals were found intact. They then proceeded to inventory the contents.

At the request of the parties involved, an official document was drawn up in Paramaribo in the presence of Alexander Salomons and Carel Jmbert as witnesses.

Signed by:

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 396 / 0611  


On 3 December 1781, in Paramaribo, Wilco Pieter Wilkens, the provisionally sworn clerk of the Colony of Suriname and its rivers and districts, recorded a statement.

Christiaan Frederik Schaufler, a resident of the colony, declared before Wilco Pieter Wilkens and witnesses that he had been named the sole and universal heir in the will of the late Georg Willem Timme. This will was drawn up on 27 May 1773 by F. H. Andree, the then provisionally sworn clerk, and witnesses, after some legacies and the legitimate portion for the parents were accounted for.

At the time, Schaufler was unaware of the state and condition of the estate and suspected it might be heavily burdened with debts. Therefore, he declared that he would only accept the inheritance under the right of deliberation, which allowed a period of 1 year and 6 weeks, or as long as the law permitted for heirs to decide.

Schaufler promised to liquidate the estate as soon as possible and to declare within the allowed time whether he would accept or reject the inheritance, for the benefit of the creditors.

He requested that this declaration be officially recorded by the provisionally sworn clerk. The act was drawn up in Paramaribo in the presence of witnesses P. M. Peneux, C. Jubert, E. F. Schaufler, G. M. Peneux, W. F. Wilkens, and Carel Jubert, the provisionally sworn clerk.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 396 / 0609  


On 11 November 1793, two legal cases were documented in Suriname:

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.01.02 / 1585 / 0105  


On 15 August 1828, Lourens Goede, sworn clerk at the secretariat of Suriname rivers and districts, recorded a statement in the presence of witnesses Samuel da Conseca and Johannes Pink.

Miss Blanca de Britto, widow of the late Samuel B. Bilas, declared her intention to enter into a Jewish and lawful marriage with David Cohen Naaij. Before this marriage, she wished to provide proper proof to her children regarding the inheritance from her late husband.

However, she stated with great sorrow that her late husband had left no goods or assets, as was widely known. This left her unable to provide any inheritance proof to her children, as she and her children were left in a sad and needy state.

To formally document this, Miss Blanca de Britto requested a declaratory act, which was drawn up in Para in the presence of the aforementioned witnesses.

Witnesses: Blancabue nobibas, Samdaso omnseer, Johannes Vink.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 337 / 0087  


On 6 December 1781, an inventory was recorded in Paramaribo by Jacob Juda Junior, Salomant, Jsak Emanuets, Carel Jmbert, Cote, Wilkens, and Provincial Clerk.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 255 / 0791  


On 781, the following items were listed: On 782, the following items were listed: The following slaves were given by the widow, but their masters were unknown. She declared this to prevent any prejudice, as she did not want to favor any creditors through this inventory.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 255 / 0789  


1779 A bureau containing: 1780 Financial assets:
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 255 / 0787  


View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 255 / 0785  


View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 255 / 0783  


View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 255 / 0781  


On 25 February 1778, Eliazar David Cohen created a will, which was recorded in Superscriptie No. 96, folio 558. After his death, an inventory of his shop goods, furniture, linen, and other belongings was made on 5 December 1771 at the request of Jacob Juda Jur and Isac Emanuels, who were guardians of the High German Jewish Nation in Amsterdam. The inventory was conducted by Alexandere Selomons and Carel Jmbert, as the widow of Eliazar David Cohen renounced the mentioned goods. The inventory, recorded by the sworn clerk, included the following items found in the front room:
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 255 / 0779  


View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 383 / 0009  


On 25 November 1776, Mejuffrouw Rachel Iuda, assisted by her fiancé Cevy Davido, appeared before Johan Crust Hafftenberger, the provincial sworn clerk and secretary of the colony of Suriname, its rivers, and districts. She declared that she had received from her stepfather Eliaser David Cohen and her mother Mejuffrouw Beeltje Worden a sum of 833 guilders and 4 stuivers in cash.

This amount was in settlement of her inheritance portion from the estate of her late father Simon Iuda. Therefore, Mejuffrouw Rachel Iuda declared that she acquitted, released, and discharged her stepfather and mother from any further claims or demands. She also waived all possible legal exceptions and defenses, including those related to undervaluation, uncollected amounts, relief, recovery of accounts, and any other legal means.

The act was drawn up and passed in Paramaribo in the presence of witnesses Jean Francois Aubert di Chene and Willem Johan Ceysner.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 383 / 0317  


16291 If the bride died within 2 or 3 years after marriage, Sal den Bruydegom kept everything without giving anything away. The bride's father and mother agreed to allow the groom, in case of the bride's death, to return half or the full Ketuba amount within 2 years. Sal den Bruydegom agreed to cover all wedding costs to his satisfaction. All parties accepted these terms, giving up any legal objections. Witnesses: Johan Ernst Henberger, Reinhard Klingelhoefer, Drijhand JHofftenberger, Rachel Juda, Jsrael Gomperts, Jacob Juda Junor, Chaldocher rancken, B: Cahen, Geb=k Nordi, GezwClercq, Abraham H:d Costa.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 126 / 0261  


09-23
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 126 / 0259  


In Suriname on 6 October 1775, before Arnoldus Francken, a sworn clerk and secretary of the colony, and in the presence of 30 witnesses, the following appeared: The parties declared that on 1 September 1775, they had entered into a preliminary contract regarding the prenuptial agreement between Levy Davids and Rachel Iuda, which they now wished to confirm as follows:
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.05.11.14 / 126 / 0257  



Previous pageNext page

Find your ancestors and publish your family tree on Genealogy Online via https://www.genealogieonline.nl/en/