Transcriptions » Recently generated summaries of recognized texts

On 20 November 1726, a shipment was sent from Siam (modern-day Thailand) carrying letters, documents, and a cargo of 500 bales of tin. Of these, 250 bales were distributed among ships anchored nearby, while the remaining 300 bales were brought along on the voyage.

The shipment also included records from a smaller trading post, sent earlier on 7 September via the ship Risdam. These records contained:

• Trade agreements and payroll ledgers.
• Standard yearly documents.
• An additional 550 bales of tin, consisting of:
  • 250 bales received from the ship Bokonings.
  • 300 bales purchased locally.

Following instructions from higher authorities, 250 bales were distributed among three ships and sent as ordered. The remaining 300 bales were transported using the vessels Ligor and Tingieter but were not stored at the Amsterdam sea warehouse due to fears of piracy, which was common in the region at the time.

The authorities in Siam expressed their commitment to following further orders as closely as possible, particularly regarding the expected arrival of Chinese junks by 16 December. This plan had also been recommended by merchant Colk to the officials in Ligor.

On 2 January 1726, a ship named Risdam arrived carrying official documents from Siam (modern-day Thailand). These included:

• A letter from merchant and chief officer Gregorius Hendrik Drageman and the Council in Siam to the Governor-General and Council of the Dutch East India Company in Batavia (modern-day Jakarta), dated 28 November 1725.
• A decision made by the Council in Siam on 22 October 1725 about renting a local ship to transport supplies aboard.
• Two decisions from 28 October and 17 November 1725 regarding proposals by Governor-General Mattheus de Haan for appointing certain officials in Siam.
• A letter from the chief officer and Council in Siam to their counterparts in Japan, dated 4 June 1725.
• Three exchanged letters between Siamese and Ligor (modern-day Nakhon Si Thammarat) officials, dated 8 September, 26 October, and 3 November 1725.
• A translated request from the King of Siam concerning a young man who had traveled from Siam to Japan.
• Three statements, two of which involved Secunde and van Alderwereld, regarding the collapse of the shoreline near the seafront warehouses on Amsterdam Island (likely referring to Dejima, the Dutch trading post in Nagasaki).
• A translated document about Secunde van Alderwereld's close interactions with the English.
• A register listing all the letters and additional documents included in this shipment.

• On 30 March 1739, Simon Cornelisse Nieteland, the only heir of his deceased sister Marytje Cornelisse (widow of Jan Lubbertsz Nieteland), appeared before the notary Gerard van Otelaar in Haarlem.
• Simon gave his wife, Marytje Jans, full power to sell a property on his behalf.
• The property was a house with land located outside the city of Hoorn, in Risdam, which Simon had inherited from his sister.
• Marytje Jans was authorized to:
  • Sell the property publicly or privately, under any conditions she saw fit.
  • Transfer ownership to the buyer(s) ("Cooper" or "Coopers").
  • Handle any necessary legal paperwork to complete the sale.
  • Receive the payment for the sale on Simon's behalf.

On 10 November 1727, a report from Malacca included the following updates:

• The promotion of Pieter Albregts, the cook's mate from the ship Ouwerkerk, to cook with a salary of 16 guilders was approved.
• Jacob Jacobsz, who had been serving as a local surgeon and teacher in Malacca, was sent to Batavia aboard the Ouwerkerk to recover from a long illness. His role as a local teacher was temporarily filled by Steven van den Berg, a local citizen recommended by the church council.
• The survivors of the shipwrecked vessel Risdam also traveled on the Ouwerkerk, except for sailor Willem Martensz, who had died in Malacca.
• A request was made to officially approve the promotion of Pieter Albregts as cook.

On 29 December 1730, a ship from Siam was completely destroyed, leaving the crew with nothing but their lives. All goods and the ship itself were lost. An inspection revealed the ship was in such poor condition that it was shocking no one had noticed or taken better care of it. The writers criticized the Dutch East India Company (VOC) for accepting such preventable losses caused by the negligence of its employees.

The text also refers to a past proposal by former head Christiaan Cock from 20 September 1727. He suggested reducing wages for mint workers in exchange for giving local workers shares worth 7,000 or 10,000 units (likely guilders or similar). Two key points were raised for improving trade in Siam:

• The local people’s strong and unchanging customs made it difficult to reduce the annual supply of sappanhout (a type of wood), which the VOC would struggle to obtain.
• The King of Siam owed the VOC an annual payment of 1,000 catties (a weight unit) of tin and ivory. However, the current stock was only 900 catties, valued at 42 ducats per catty instead of the usual 40 ducats. This adjustment could help cover losses from minting operations.

The writers noted that avoiding this annual obligation would actually be more profitable, as the losses from minting (around 7,200 guilders, based on a letter from the ministers of 20 September 1727) would otherwise continue.

The letter, written in Siam on 29 December 1730, discusses ongoing trade issues and complaints about poor practices in the Dutch East India Company (VOC).

• The quality of ginger must meet strict standards to keep traders satisfied, ensuring it is pure and of good quality.
• Workers in the sugar warehouse in Batavia are accused of cheating. Reports from the Netherlands that year complained about poor-quality sugar and tampered scales, showing that fraud affects both Asian trading posts and the homeland.
• The journey of a ship to Batavia was poorly managed. Due to weak leadership and sickness among the crew, the ship barely reached the height of Johor before problems forced it to stop. This was a serious failure, as proper support could have prevented the loss.
• The ship Risdam had similarly struggled near Johor in 1726 before it was wrecked, showing a pattern of neglect in these voyages.

On 28 February 1727, a document was prepared in Malacca under the authority of Governor Hermanus van Suchtelen and his council. The document bore a black seal with the inscription "Sultan Alaiddin Shah, ibnu Oefsoe" (son of Oefsoe).

The papers listed were entrusted to a Chinese messenger, Tsim Tsonko, to be delivered to Governor-General Matthäus De Haan and the Council of the Dutch East Indies in Batavia. The documents included:

• An original letter from Hermanus van Suchtelen and the Malacca council, dated 28 February 1727.
• A copy of a letter sent in late January via the pachiallang (a type of vessel), marked as number 4.
• A copy of a resolution made by the Police Council on 12 February 1727, approving the urgent preparation of:
  • A letter to Daijieng Marewa in Riow.
  • Another letter to the captain of ship number 3.
• A report given on 12 February 1727 by Jan Schoon (assistant helmsman) and Anne de Haan (caulker), who had been on the ship Risdam. They described the shipwreck near Pulo Gadia, close to Pulo Simaon, and their arrival in Malacca via a Portuguese ship, the Nossa Senhora de Conceição.

The document also noted that a king from Johor, referred to as King Hendrik 9, had been sent from Malacca.

On 28 January 1728, a letter was sent from Siam (modern-day Thailand) by Smel Christiaan Cock, a merchant and resident, along with his assistant and second-in-command, Alexander Walaart. They addressed the letter respectfully to the directors of the Dutch East India Company (VOC) in Ligor (modern-day Nakhon Si Thammarat).

• The letter refers to an earlier agreement signed in Ligor on 8 September 1725, confirmed by notary G. Schryver.
• On 16 September 1727, the ship Risdam arrived, carrying a copy of a previous letter from the directors, dated 25 June of that year.
• The letter mentioned a bancosoij (likely a financial document or bill of exchange) that was supposed to be sent but never arrived.
• Cock and Walaart explained they had not sent the requested follow-up documents because the local governor, referred to as Berquelang, had promised to settle the matter himself—but had not done so yet.
• The writers were surprised by the directors' insistence on a formal order regarding the VOC's trading privileges, especially for tin. They noted that previous orders had been forgotten due to frequent changes in Ligor's leadership.
• They suggested the directors should remind the newly arrived governors, calling them "good friends," about these privileges.

On 28 September 1728, a letter was sent from Siam (modern-day Thailand) by Smel Christiaan Cock and Alexander Walaart, who identified themselves as loyal and respectful servants. They referred to an earlier document from 8 September 1725, signed in Ligore (modern-day Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand) by G. Schriver, confirming their roles: Cock as onderkoopman (junior merchant) and resident, and Walaart as assistant and second-in-command.

The letter discussed the arrival of the ship Risdam on 16 September and mentioned a previous letter from 25 June that had not been fully addressed. The writers explained they had not sent follow-up orders because the local governor, referred to as Berquelang, had promised to fulfill the requests himself—but this had not yet happened.

The letter also expressed surprise at the urgency stressed in the recipient’s request for an official order confirming the trading privileges of the Dutch East India Company (VOC). The writers noted that previous orders had been forgotten due to frequent changes in Ligore's leadership. They suggested the recipient should remind the newly arrived governor, referred to as Goede Vrunden (Good Friends), about these privileges.

In 1697, a letter revealed details about a shipwreck. The writer confirmed receiving 21 heads (likely referring to survivors) from a ship called the Risdam, which deserved attention. The rest of the details would follow the letter's content.

The letter mentioned that on 10 March, a Chinese captain named Tantijnko delivered a message in the Malay language. This message was originally sent by Dajeing Marewa, who held the title Kalana Draga, and was now acting as the governor for the king of Johor in Riouw (present-day Riau).

• The letter served as a notice that the ship Risdam had sunk near Batu Gadjah (on the Elephant's Reef, directly across from Pulo Babij) on 3 January.
• On 4 February, by his order, 57 people from the ship’s crew were transported by local boats under the supervision of the regent of Marsang to Riouw.
• He had provided the survivors with necessary aid from the ship’s supplies.
• Later, under a Chinese skipper and accountant, 21 people from the shipwrecked crew were sent back, including the ship’s captain, Hendrik Schoon, and the ship’s accountant.

On 17 June 1725, the Portuguese ship Nossa Senhora de Piedade, led by captain Thomas Fletcher and assistant Roeland Beijts, arrived at the Cape of Good Hope on 4 February of that year. During the journey, 1 soldier had died. At the cape, 4 sailors and 5 soldiers either left the ship or deserted, while 4 new sailors boarded. The ship left Table Bay on 28 February without losing any more crew and arrived with a total of 147 people: 100 sailors and 47 soldiers.

The document also lists other ships and their details:

• Blijdorp: Arrived from Amboina with 9 people.
• An unnamed ship with Mr. Gloster: Arrived from Canton with 15 people.
• Risdam: Stopped in Nias with 8 people.
• Jacht Wijnendaal: Arrived from Samarang with 8 people.
• St. Nicolaas: Arrived from Macao with 5 people, including the new governor of Amboina, Mensoharmanus Ladenius, who brought 16 people to Cheribon.
• Noordbeek: Traveled from Amboina via Samarang.
• De Raadhuys van Plissingen and Bendveld: Two small ships (pantjalangs) named De Snoek and De Haai.
• Calcar: An English ship heading to Canton.
• Goram: A pantjalang from Cheribon with 11 people.

The Hoorn, another ship, had lost a military assistant and a sailor, with 13 soldiers and sailors still on board.

On 22 November, the authorities and lower officers of the ship Wapen van Hoorn completed their oath. This was reported to the Governor-General, who then decided to prepare the strong and sturdy ship Saxenburg and 17 other ships for departure.

A letter was sent with the ships of the second convoy to inform others of this decision. The goal was to reach the trading region earlier than in the past 5 to 6 years, hoping that traders from Macao and Chinese merchants would arrive on time. However, none had been reported so far.

A legal record from the previous day was presented at the meeting. It confirmed that the required oath had been completed by the authorities and lower officers of the Wapen van Hoorn. The issue involved a small amount (over 2 units) of Japanese copper, which the crew had improperly distributed from the ship’s cargo to a supplier named Levert. The meeting agreed that this matter had been addressed and resolved.

On November 22, officials confirmed that the crew equipment master and other involved parties were cleared of responsibility regarding the loss of the ship Gisdam. This decision followed an earlier investigation and declaration of innocence. The case involved two documents for Amsterdam and Zeeland, along with reports about Sumatra and the Cape of Good Hope. A note was also made for officials at the Cape to record the outcome.

Earlier, on November 3, the crew equipment master Michiel Weste, appointed skippers, and the advocate fiscal (a legal official) had examined the leaders of the ship Risdam about the loss of a boat in the Gulf of Siam. The investigation, led by the advocate fiscal Everhard Kraeijvanger, concluded that the crew was not at fault, as confirmed by a written statement. The officials accepted this decision as final.

Additionally, two letters were approved for the directors of the chambers in Amsterdam and Middelburg, addressing matters related to the West Coast of Sumatra and the Cape of Good Hope. A total of 9 related documents were also approved.

On 138 (likely a reference to a document or case number), officials discussed the return of a regular ship route instead of a new appointment. They excused two issues: one involving the payment of departure fees for 3 Portuguese ships, and another about a shipwreck near Hisdam.

Two letters were received by the government in Malacca, sent by a Chinese messenger named Tsim Tsong Ko. These letters, dated 28 February and 14 March, were from the ship Risdam and had already been shared with higher authorities.

The text also mentions:

• The dismissal of merchant Jan de Roode on 29 April due to unspecified reasons. He had left his role as a warehouse master.
• Three other junior merchants—Hendrik van der Bel, Gerardus Bernardus Visscher, and Joan Harman Theling—had also departed.
• Officials were ordered to return two ships to Malacca.
• The arrival and later departure of 3 Portuguese ships to Goa and Surat. These ships had initially avoided paying anchoring fees but were later excused from the debt to encourage trade.
• A report of a shipwreck near Pulo Timon, though one-third of the payment was still made in Malacca.

• The government's requests were mostly fulfilled by the ships Noordbeek and Bentveld.
• The election of Joan Frederik van Malacca is mentioned.
• Suchtelein was allowed to leave his post after serving for 10 years, with the condition that his salary would be paused until he found new employment. If he preferred, he could return to the homeland immediately.
• The ship Ouwerkerk was sent on 15 August with goods and supplies for the government, though not all requested items could be loaded. The remaining goods, including wood and equipment, were delivered on 7 and 22 of the same month by the ships Bentveld and Noordbeek, which were assigned to this location.
• A reply was sent via the Ouwerkerk to letters received from the previous year, confirming that Hermanus van Suchtelen was granted his requested release after 10 years of service.
• Joan Frederik van Malacca was nominated as the new governor to replace Suchtelein, while the current governor was assigned to Macassar.

• The ship Huijten Bene was built in India in 1640, with a length of 140 feet.
• Other large ships, each with a length of 130 feet and a width of around 32 to 35 feet, were built between 1699 and 1725:
  • C. Bellevliet (1706)
  • A. Nederhoven (1710)
  • Z. Abbekerk (1699)
  • A. Fraedels van Vlissingen (1716)
  • C. Risdam (1715)
  • C. Gansenhoff (1703)
  • B. Velserhoofd (year partially unclear)
  • C. Hogermeer (1717)
  • B. Ouwerkerk (1708)
  • C. D'Annasone (1710)
  • A. Westerbeek (1723)
  • A. Saxenburg (1724)
  • A. D' Geertruijd (1719)
  • A. Meerhuijsen (1717)
  • A. Haefften (1719)
  • A. Loenderveen (1720)
  • A. Tstadhuijs van Delbt (1719)
  • A. D' Baenman (1722)
  • A. 't Land van Beloften (1725)
• Smaller boats called chialoupens (longboats) and pantchials (small rowing boats), built in Amboina (now Ambon, Indonesia):
  • Chialoupen Bouro (1711), 76 feet long
  • De Speelman (1713), 65 feet long
  • Komkommer (1713), 60 feet long

• On 29 November 1726, a report from Siam discussed the trade of a heavy mineral called tical swaerte, which was valued at 8¾ mat.
• The 21 Commissioners (a governing group) had approved starting trade operations after the departure of two ships, the Coningcarel and the Risdam.
• The plan was to send a small amount of gold—or as much as possible—along with a portion of the requested elephant tusks to a highly respected official (referred to as "uw Edel hoog agtb:") with the ship Vesserhooft around early December 1726.
• The goal was to invest between 70,000 and 80,000 rijksdaalders (or more) into this mineral trade, following the official’s respected intentions.
• To ensure accuracy, they respectfully requested that an assayer (a specialist in testing metals) be sent to them, as they had already received the necessary tools for testing but needed expertise to use them properly.
• They promised to handle the matter with great care and precision.

• The letter mentions an earlier ship, the Thoff niet altijd Winter, which left Samarang on 16 April carrying a load of salt.
• It includes another letter meant to accompany a person referred to as "the prince" (Engenius).
• The writers state that this accompanying letter should be sent quickly to Batavia with the departure of the messenger.
• The letter ends with greetings and is confirmed by Hendrik Gousset.

• Ships dispatched on 20, 28, and 29 October included:
  • 't Huijs te Vlotter
  • Hoogermeer
  • Risdam
  • Prins Eugenius
  These carried timber, hoping to meet the needs of the authorities.
• The ship Magdalena had already left on 12 October with similar cargo.
• The ship 't Huijs ter Boede returned directly under orders from Pieter Gijsbert Noodt, Commander of Java’s East Coast.
• It carried timber as listed in the attached invoice, including:
  • 5 new flat-bottomed boats (called platbomen), each:
    • 40 feet long
    • 12.5 feet wide
    • 3.5 feet deep

On 28 November 1725, a document was sent from Siam (modern-day Thailand) to Governor-General Matthijs de Haan and the Council of the Dutch Indies in Batavia (modern-day Jakarta). The letter included records of a ship’s cargo and expenses.

The letter also reported that on 16 November 1725, the leaders of the ship Risdam—Captain Hendrik Schoon and Bookkeeper Barend Hölscher—arrived in Siam. They had left Batavia on 7 June 1725, stopped in Ligor (modern-day Nakhon Si Thammarat) on 14 July 1725, and departed again on 15 August 1725.

The ship carried two important letters:

• A letter from the Council of the Dutch Indies, dated 7 June 1725.
• A letter from the Dutch representative in Ligor.

The writers expressed surprise that the representative in Ligor had ignored earlier orders from De Haan and the Council, specifically those sent on 29 July 1724. These orders had criticized the weak trade purchases in the region.

On 29 November 1736, a letter from Siam (modern-day Thailand) was sent to address a conflict involving Prageman, a merchant, and the local orphan chamber (a body overseeing orphaned children's welfare). The writers hoped the respected officials would show kindness to the orphans involved and protect their interests.

• The dispute stemmed from unresolved issues between the outgoing chief, Prageman, and the junior merchant Rugier van Alderweereld from the previous year (1735).
• The writers expected Prageman to explain his actions to the officials.
• Rugier van Alderweereld was to provide a written account and original documents, including a declaration from Hendrik Schoon, about the ship Risdam (ship number 10), which served the Dutch East India Company (VOC).
• The letter assured the officials that peace and unity would be maintained at the trading post to prevent further troubles.

The local military ships Purmer Lust, Margaretha, Risdam, Abbekerk, and Keetel arrived with their crews, who were owed wages for a total of 27 June (recently passed). According to a decision by the authorities on 26 June, they were to receive a payment of 57,519.125 rijksdaalders to cover 351 unpaid wages.

Before the payment was made, the authorities ordered on 17 July of that year that the officers of these ships had to swear an oath in Mahu. They declared under oath that none of the crew members included mercenaries, Javanese, or enslaved individuals. The following payments were noted, with some amounts withheld until further notice:

• Abdul Basier Pamatsoetan (Bailiff Sergeant, Campong Soedaat crew): 160.5 rijksdaalders
• Oebong (Campong crew): 166.5 rijksdaalders
• Transport workers: 327 rijksdaalders

• A signed original letter from the leaders of the Dutch trading post in Siam to the Dutch East India Company's government in Batavia, dated January 1727.
• Two copies of another letter from the same trading post, dated 29 November 1726, previously sent with the ships Koning Karel and Risdam.
• Three letters from the King of Siam and his official (called berckelang) to the Dutch East India Company's government in Batavia, stored in a box.
• Four copies of a financial statement showing what the King of Siam and his official still owed the Dutch East India Company as of 10 December 1726.
• A translated debt acknowledgment from a local merchant group (sconings clangs), dated 11 December 1726.

Between 23 January and 5 March 1727, records were kept of the cargo carried by ships arriving in Batavia from the Dutch homeland. These included the ships Iacoba, Commerrust, Berbices, Meerlust, and Winthond, detailing the unloaded supplies.

On 21 March 1727, Cornelis van Berendregt, a water inspector, submitted a statement reserving his legal action in a dispute between the Dutch East India Company (Compagnie) and Ida Hochepied. Two additional documents listed the costs incurred by Hochepied during the same legal process.

Between 17 September and 19 December 1726, letters were exchanged between officials on the west coast of Sumatra and Nicolaas Mettenius, a mining supervisor at Sillida, regarding mining operations. Six miners and a blacksmith filed a complaint on 19 December 1726 about Mettenius' harsh treatment. Another document listed tools and materials Mettenius requested for the Sillida gold mine.

On 14 March 1727, captain H. Schoon and accountant Barent Holscher provided a written account of the loss of the ship Risdam. Officers from the ship Konink Carel also submitted a report on 1 January 1727 about their voyage alongside the Risdam.

On 15 December 1726, an agreement was recorded between the Dutch East India Company and the King of Siam, including his advisor, Berquelang. A debt acknowledgment from the Siamese court officials was also dated 10 December 1726.

A Malay-language letter from Daing Marewa to the Governor-General and Council in Batavia was received on 10 March 1727.

On 21 March 1727, Frederik Lokman, a customs officer in Sabang, reported on the treatment of European ships in China, based on information from Portuguese captain Iohan Baptista Montero.

On 21 July 1722, Abraham Patras, a commissioner, submitted a report on his mission to Palembang and Tambij. A separate document summarized the allowances and rations provided to Company employees during this mission. Another report, dated 8 May 1722, described the escape of the usurper Mancaboemij.

• A set of incoming letters and attachments from the Ligoor trading post, covering the period from January 1725 to August 1726.
• Records of daily business meetings held in Siam, led by the outgoing chief officer Prageman and a merchant, spanning November 1725 to October 1726.
• Two sets of financial records (trade journals, ledgers, and cash books) for the Siam and Ligoor trading posts from the years 1723 to 1726.
• An original resolution document from a meeting held on 25 November 1726, reviewing the trade books for 1723–1726.
• 17 sets of payroll journals and ledgers for employees in Siam and Ligoor from 1721 to 1726.
• Two original crew lists for Siam and Ligoor, dated June 1726.
• A shipping document (bill of lading and invoice) for goods loaded onto the ship Koning Karel.
• An expense report for the ship Koning Karel, under Captain Risdam.
• A duplicate register (copy of an official record).
• A letter to the Dutch East India Company government, dated 29 November 1726.
• A list of requested supplies for the King of Siam, the mountains (likely referring to mining or remote areas), and the trading posts in Siam and Ligoor for the years 1727–1728.