Browse transcripts » National Archives / Archives South Hollandarchive access 1.05.11.14, inventory number 162, page 26
Transcription
17. Catharina
pandora met d' Caat.
48
29. Brena.
30. Clamara
31. Cartjsen huijs slaven
32. donas idem
33. Anna idem
34. Maria thuijnnierster
35. Cornelias huijs slavin.
Jongens.
1. Pilo. Criool
8. dekje d:o
3 fortuijn d.o
—n
4. frans. d.o
5
n
5. Otto. d
.
6. tamboer d:o
1.
7 troebbel.
n
=8. Daniel d
en
9. Cornelis.
en
10= Pieter
9
n
11. Samton.
en
12. Lubberts. d.o
13. Hran. d:o
14: Marcus Mulat.
15. Abram geswollen Criool
16. Matthijs suijgeling.
17. Hendrik idems
18. Jan Baas idem.
Reijsjes
1. Atfester Criool
n
2 fransewa
3 Brandena do
4 Tabel . . gen:
in
5. quassibog d.o
6. Sandrina d:o vol deeren
pandora met d' Caat.
48
29. Brena.
30. Clamara
31. Cartjsen huijs slaven
32. donas idem
33. Anna idem
34. Maria thuijnnierster
35. Cornelias huijs slavin.
Jongens.
1. Pilo. Criool
8. dekje d:o
3 fortuijn d.o
—n
4. frans. d.o
5
n
5. Otto. d
.
6. tamboer d:o
1.
7 troebbel.
n
=8. Daniel d
en
9. Cornelis.
en
10= Pieter
9
n
11. Samton.
en
12. Lubberts. d.o
13. Hran. d:o
14: Marcus Mulat.
15. Abram geswollen Criool
16. Matthijs suijgeling.
17. Hendrik idems
18. Jan Baas idem.
Reijsjes
1. Atfester Criool
n
2 fransewa
3 Brandena do
4 Tabel . . gen:
in
5. quassibog d.o
6. Sandrina d:o vol deeren
Source citation
National Archives / Archives South Holland, archive number 1.05.11.14, Inventaris van het digitaal duplicaat van de notariële archieven van Suriname, 1699-1828 (1836), inventory number 162, MINUUT-AKTEN, GEPASSEERD TER SECRETARIE, Inventarissen en prisaties (taxaties), 1728-1729
Scan + Transcription
Click on the image to enlarge it and see the transcription next to it
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The transcription was made by computer via automatic handwriting recognition.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.