Transcriptions » Recently created summaries of historical documents

Users of Open Archives can have a summary made of the transcriptions created using handwriting recognition.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient to make the historical document understandable. In the transcripts, names are underlined in green and clickable (to search the personal entries on Open Archives for the name in question), the recognized dates have a light gray background and recognized place names have a light purple background.


Willem Veltman, who lived in the Coolsteegh coming out at the Burghwal in Haarlem, appeared before notary Melchior van Clijnenberg on 26 June 1709. He declared that he owed Hendrick Meerman, who lived in the city of Rees in the land of Cleeff, the sum of 100 guilders in capital. This debt came from money that had been properly lent and provided to him, which Veltman admitted he had received and used long ago from Meerman. He gave up the right to claim that the money had not been counted out to him. Veltman accepted and promised to pay interest at the rate of 25 per 100 per year, to be counted from the date of this document until the debt was fully paid. To guarantee this, Veltman declared he would bind his person and goods, placing them under the control of all courts and judges. This document was passed in Haarlem in the presence of Hendrik van Eeckent and Bruijn as witnesses.

View transcript 


16 February 1769 Catharina Oostkort, an unmarried adult woman living in Amsterdam, appeared before notary Isaac Pool, who was licensed by the Court of Holland. She appointed Abraham Boots, a lawyer for the court of the city of Alkmaar, as her legal representative. He was given full authority to handle all her legal cases, both as plaintiff and defendant, at all court levels. This included pursuing cases through to final judgment and execution. He could do everything that Catharina Oostkort herself could do if she were present, and he had the power to appoint substitutes. She promised to approve his actions and be legally bound by them. The document was signed in Amsterdam with witnesses Gerrit van Houten and Hermanus Meyer present.
View transcript 


February 20, 1823, at 11 o'clock in the morning, the death of Anna Maria Ooskort was registered. She died on February 19 at 4 o'clock in the morning at the age of 85 years. She lived on Tyidsrraat number 49, Canton 33, and died there. She was born in Stemport and was the widow of Barend Veltman. The deceased left behind property without real estate and had children. This was declared by Willem Veltman, 52 years old, living at the address mentioned above, son of the deceased, working as a clockmaker, and by Jan Veltman, 26 years old, living at the address mentioned above, working as an actor, also son of the deceased. After being read aloud, the document was signed by both witnesses and confirmed according to the law by a member of the Commission for Civil Registration of the City of Amsterdam.

February 20, 1823, at 11 o'clock in the morning, the death of Antonie Fikkert was registered. He died on the same day at 4 o'clock in the morning at the age of 3 weeks. He lived on Ooomstraat number 74, Canton 6, and died there. He was born there as the son of Maria. The deceased left behind property without real estate and had children. This was declared by Cornelis Kroon, 60 years old, living at the address mentioned above, working as a skipper, brother-in-law of the deceased, and by Johannes Nieman, 49 years old, living on Zwartlakenstegg number 16, working as a tailor, nephew of the deceased. After being read aloud, the document was signed by the second witness, as the first declared he could not write, and confirmed according to the law by a member of the Commission for Civil Registration of the City of Amsterdam.

February 20, 1823, at 11 o'clock in the morning, the death of Johan Prins Louis Dunhard was registered. He died on February 19 at 3 o'clock in the morning at the age of half a year. He lived in the workhouse and died there. He was born there as the son of Johan Christof and Aanna Christina Schmitten. According to an official report from the workhouse mentioned above, the deceased left behind property without real estate and had children. After being read aloud, the document was confirmed according to the law by a member of the Commission for Civil Registration of the City of Amsterdam.

February 20, 1823, at 11 o'clock in the morning, the death of Elisabeth Maria Moreau was registered. She died on the same day at 3 o'clock in the morning at the age of 7 years. She lived on Hlorestraat number 138, Canton 5, and died there. She was born there as the daughter of Territ Moreau and Anna Janren. The deceased left behind property without real estate and had children. This was declared by the father, 33 years old, living at the address mentioned above, working as a shoemaker, and by Nicolees Moreau, 36 years old, living on Lindent number 2, working as a supervisor, uncle of the deceased. After being read aloud, the document was signed by both witnesses and confirmed according to the law by a member of the Commission for Civil Registration of the City of Amsterdam.

View transcript 


Catharina Koster declared that she was completely satisfied with the arrangements that had been made for her. She stated that she greatly preferred to receive 30 stuivers per week for the rest of her life instead of receiving the legitimate portion (her legal share of inheritance) that she would otherwise be entitled to receive from the estate when the person died without children. She explicitly declared that she gave up her right to this legitimate portion. This document was signed in the city of Haarlem in the presence of witnesses Gerrit Koenderink Junior and Isaac van der Tholl. The document was signed by Jan Veltman, Gerrit Koenderink Junior, Maria Vos, and Catharina Koster (who made her mark), Isaac Van Der Tholl, Barent Veltman, and notary Jacob Clout on 29 January 1790.
View transcript 


View transcript 


Nicolaas Brenkelaar, a peace judge in Canton Two, District Amsterdam, made and issued a certificate of acknowledgment on 1 October 1811. This document showed that the grandparents on both sides of Abram Hinken had died.

On 6 October 1811, the same Nicolaas Brenkelaar issued a similar certificate showing that the grandparents on both sides of Katrina Rempel had also died.

The marriage announcement for these two people was properly prepared on 18 October 1811 and posted at the town hall of this municipality on 20 October 1811. No objections were received against the marriage.

After the couple clearly declared to the official that they would take each other as spouses, he announced in the name of the law that Abram Winken and Katrina Rempel were legally united. The marriage certificate was signed by the spouses and witnesses, along with the official Gerrit ten Sande (deputy mayor).

The witnesses were:

On 3 November 1811, another couple appeared before the deputy mayor of the city of Amsterdam as civil registrar to arrange a marriage. The witnesses present were Evert van de Grampel (living on Voorburgwal across from the New Church), Pierre Francois Franssen (at the town hall), Jan van Batenburg (in Vijzelstraat), and Willem van Lieuwen (in Utrechtse Dwarsstraat), all living in this city.

The couple consisted of Pieter Barbiers, 53 years old, a painter, born in Amsterdam, widower of Joanna Louisa Vryck, living in Slandboogstraat near Sleijigeweg number 5. He was the son of Antony Barbiers and Martj van Gijsen, both deceased.

The bride was Joanna Gesina Everstyn, 29 years old, born in Amsterdam, without profession, living at the same address. She was the daughter of Joannes Everstyn and Joanna Gesina Reuzekamp, both deceased.

The following documents were presented:

  1. The baptism certificate of Pieter Barbiers, issued by Gerrit ten Sande, deputy mayor of this city. It showed he was baptized in the Roman Catholic Church called the Post Horn on 1 April 1758 as the child of his aforementioned parents.
  2. The baptism certificate of Joanna Gesina Everstyn, issued by W. E. Bouman, Roman Catholic priest in the same church. It showed she was baptized there on 14 August 1782 as the child of her aforementioned parents.
  3. The death certificate of Joanna Louisa Vryck, wife of Pieter Barbiers, issued by W. H. Voombergz, deputy mayor of this city. It showed she was buried in the South Churchyard.
View transcript 


Pieter Barbiers, an artist, lived in the Kleine Houtstraat in Haarlem. On 21 August 1811, he appeared before notary Jacob Scholting, who lived in Haarlem in the First District of the Department of the Zuiderzee, to make his will.

Pieter Barbiers declared under oath that he did not belong to a higher class of wealth than indicated by the official stamp used on this document. He cancelled and voided all previous wills and last testaments he had made before this date. He declared that if he should die without children, he appointed his wife Maria Geertruij Snabilie as his sole heir to everything he would leave behind after his death, as far as the law allowed him to freely decide about it, with full inheritance rights.

View transcript 


On 3 October 1800, Jessuran Sentoe and Klaartje Koeper were married in Amsterdam, and their child was properly recognized and made legitimate.

On 21 August 1815 at 10 o'clock in the morning, a birth certificate was registered for Jacob Koeper, who was born on 18 August in the evening at 8 o'clock. He was the son of Elara Jacob Koeper, who had no profession and lived at the corner of Kerkstraat and Amstel number 183, district 1. The child was recognized as being male. The witnesses were David de Pinto, 27 years old, a tobacco seller living at the same address number 133, and Isaac Jacob Koeper, 41 years old, a merchant living at Korte Houtstraat number 36. The request was made by Beeltje Franck, a midwife, 42 years old, living at Sint Anthonies Breedstraat number 44. After being read aloud, the document was signed by the midwife and both witnesses, and confirmed by David Bierens, member of the Commission for Civil Registration of the city of Amsterdam.

On 21 August 1815 at 10 o'clock in the morning, a birth certificate was registered for Pieter Barbiers, who was born on 19 August at 1 o'clock in the afternoon. He was the son of Pieter Barbiers Anthonies, a painter, and Johanna Gesina Everstin, without profession, a married couple living at Kerkstraat near Spiegelstraat number 171, district 3. The child was recognized as being male. The witnesses were Joannes Baptista Barbiers, 28 years old, a clerk at the city hall living at Reguliersplein number 7, and Frans Philippus Ernst, 24 years old, with the same profession, living at Prinsengracht near Leidschestraat. The request was made by the father. After being read aloud, the document was signed by the father and both witnesses, and confirmed by Gerrit ten Sande, member of the Commission for Civil Registration of the city of Amsterdam.

On 21 August 1815 at 10 o'clock in the morning, a birth certificate was registered for Isaac Moses Willing, who was born on 20 August in the morning at 8 o'clock. The child was the son of Moses Gabriel Willing, a buyer of old clothes, and Goetje Salomon Deper, without profession, a married couple living at Bestaviersstraat number 114. The child was recognized as being male. The witnesses were Eliazen Levie Azijnman, 36 years old, a merchant living at Batavierstraat number 90, and Raphael Sierk Opasser, 22 years old, a buyer of old clothes living at Marken 18-141. The request was made by the father. After being read aloud, the document was signed by both witnesses. The father declared he could not write. The document was confirmed by David Bierens, member of the Commission for Civil Registration of the city of Amsterdam.

On 21 August 1815 at 10 o'clock in the morning, a birth certificate

View transcript 


View transcript 


On 15 August 1849, Paulus Bartels, a 41-year-old servant living at the Buitengasthuis, and Jan Lankhorst, a 33-year-old servant living at the same address, appeared before the civil registry official in Amsterdam. They declared that on 13 August 1849 at 6:00 in the afternoon, Cornelia Klaversma died at house number 220 in Canton 11, Goestdom. She was a 42-year-old cleaning woman who lived on the Overtoom. She was born in Amsterdam and was married to Gerardus ter Hoeven. Her parents were Arie and Alida Schrender, both deceased.

On the same date, 15 August 1849, the same witnesses, Paulus Bartels and Jan Lankhorst, appeared before the civil registry official in Amsterdam. They declared that on 15 August 1849 at 1:00 in the morning, Anna van der Vaal died at house number 220 in Canton 4. She was 27 years old, had no occupation, and lived at Ridderstraat 30. She was born in Amsterdam and was married to Hendrik van Driessel. Her parents were Willem (deceased) and Maria Peeters.

On 15 August 1849, Paulus Bartels and Jan Lankhorst appeared again before the civil registry official in Amsterdam. They declared that on 13 August 1849 at 9:00 in the afternoon, Hendricus Johannes Koning died at house number 220 in Canton 4, Overtoom. He was a 39-year-old rope maker who lived on the Oudenburgsteeg. He was born in Amsterdam and was married to Jansje Jorsman. His parents were Jan Wetsel and Christina Stemmega, both deceased.

On 15 August 1849, Gerardus Cornelius Jan Meurs, a 51-year-old pharmacist living at Halsteeg 143, and Christoffel Andreas Schoeman, a 23-year-old pharmacist living at Heilige weg 20, appeared before the civil registry official in Amsterdam. They declared that on 14 August 1849 at 6:00 in the morning, Willem Hermanus Boonstra died at house number 8 in Canton 1, Suikerbakkersteeg Houtgracht. He was a 33-year-old mechanic who lived at the same address. He was born in Amsterdam and was married to Cornelia Landman. His parents were Joannes Piers Boonstra and Johanna Bolten, both deceased.

On 15 August 1849, Paulus Bartels and Jan Lankhorst appeared before the civil registry official in Amsterdam. They declared that on 14 August 1849 at 8:00 in the morning, Anna Maria Leduc died at house number 220 in Canton 4, Overtoom

View transcript 


View transcript 


On 13 October 1677 in Huijden, Claes Vinck, an apothecary living in Amsterdam, appeared before Reijnier Duee, a public notary admitted by the Court of Holland and residing in Amsterdam. Claes Vinck made this declaration in two roles: as uncle and guardian over the children of Jan Claesz Steckman and as a creditor of the estate of Jan Jaep Gerritsz, who had lived at the Haesp. Claes Vinck authorized and gave power to Cornelis Van Drosthagen, an attorney in Vleespomme, to represent him in both of these roles. Cornelis Van Drosthagen was to handle the case against the other general creditors of the mentioned estate before the aldermen of Weesper Carspel. He was authorized to take legal action before these aldermen, both as plaintiff and defendant, and to do everything that would be required in the case, just as Claes Vinck himself could do if he were present. Claes Vinck promised to accept whatever his attorney did. This document was done properly in Amsterdam in the presence of Cornelis Croock and Johannes Tijm, who were asked to serve as witnesses.
View transcript 


11 February 1780 In Haarlem, Cornelis van Drosthagen and his wife Anna Magdalena Wessels appeared before notary Julius Hendrik Fribiehen. Anna Magdalena Wessels was assisted by her husband, who gave her special permission to sign this document. They declared that they had sold a small lottery bond to Jan Koning, a merchant from Amsterdam. The bond had the following details:
  • Issued by the United Netherlands at the General Office of the Union in The Hague
  • Part of a lottery for half of 6,000,000 guilders, increased by another 3,000,000 guilders
  • Letter designation: F. R. S.
  • Capital value: 400 guilders
  • Dated 1 January 1713
  • Number: 351
  • Registered on folio 188 verso
  • Approved on 10 November 1713, registered on folio 1258 verso
The sellers had received this bond through an official transfer document dated 6 May 1774, passed before notary Jacob Elout in Haarlem, from Isaak van der Vinne and Jan van Walré. The sellers confirmed they had been fully paid for the bond, including both the capital and any interest that was due. They gave Jan Koning full ownership rights and promised to protect him against any future claims on the bond. They bound themselves and their possessions to this agreement according to law. Witnesses were Albertus Prince and Claas Westerhout.
View transcript 


  • On 20 December (year not stated), a legal document was drawn up before notary Julius Hendrik Froichen in Haarlem.
  • Egbert Agterhier, living in Haarlem, appeared as the special representative of Kaatje van Drosthag, who was the wife of Mr. Jan Boeve.
  • His authority came from a power of attorney document dated 21 June 1783, which was prepared by Z. W. Hartman, who was the mayor of the lordship of Zalk and Vekaten and notary there.
  • Egbert Agterhier, acting as representative, declared that he had sold and transferred a bond to the noblewoman Petronella Maria Heshuysen.
  • The bond was issued by the Province of Holland and West Friesland, registered at the office in Haarlem.
  • The bond was blank, worth 290 guilders in capital, dated 1 October 1687, numbered 1 D. 210 No. 1, and approved on 5 March 1688, number 1773.
  • The bond had been transferred to Kaatje van Drosthagen by Albertus Rennenbergh through a private transfer document dated 25 March 1774.
  • The representative confirmed that the buyer, the noblewoman Petronella Maria Heshuysen, had fully paid the purchase price, including both the capital and all interest that was due.
  • He therefore gave her full receipt and transferred to her all rights, claims, and ownership that his principal Kaatje van Drosthagen had held up to that date.
  • He promised to protect and guarantee the bond against all claims forever and against everyone, binding the persons and goods of Jan Boeve and Kaatje van Drosthagen as married couple for this purpose.
  • The document was signed in Haarlem in the presence of witnesses Pieter van Lee and Daniel van (surname incomplete).
View transcript 


On 27 December 1934, two marriages took place in Amsterdam before a civil registrar.

The first marriage was between Jacques Antonius Baartmans, a 64-year-old school principal born in Nijmegen and living in Maarheeze, and Clara Louise Constance Bunnemeijer, a 49-year-old woman without a profession who was born and living in Amsterdam. Jacques Antonius Baartmans was a widower whose late wife was Maria Johanna van den Borne. His parents, Johannes Jacobus Baartmans and Johanna ten Ham, were both deceased. Clara Louise Constance Bunnemeijer was the daughter of Hermann Friedrich Carl Bunnemeijer, who was deceased, and Maria Augusta Fredrica Lambertina Hake Wessell, who had no profession and lived in Amsterdam. The marriage announcement had been posted without objection in Amsterdam and Haarheeze on 15 December. The bride and groom declared they accepted each other as spouses and would faithfully fulfill all duties required by law. The registrar then declared them married by law. The witnesses were:

The second marriage was between Antonius Arends, a 27-year-old office worker born and living in Amsterdam, and Frida Karle, a 25-year-old German woman without a profession who was born in Böckingen in Germany and living in Amsterdam. Antonius Arends was the son of Antonius Arends, a 52-year-old watchman, and Johanna Geertruida Lassing, a 49-year-old woman without a profession, both living in Amsterdam. Frida Karle was the daughter of Wilhelm Karle, a bricklayer, and Anna Schmitt, without a profession, both living in Böckingen in Germany. The groom's parents gave their permission for the marriage. The marriage announcement had been posted without objection in Amsterdam on 15 December. The bride and groom declared they accepted each other as spouses and would faithfully fulfill all duties required by law. The registrar then declared them married by law. The witnesses were:

Both witnesses lived in Amsterdam.

View transcript 


Thomas van der Velde, a shipwright at the East India Company shipyard, and his wife Elisabeth Veltman, living on Wittenburg in the small street in Amsterdam, appeared before notary Johannes Boots on April 2, 1723 in the evening at 6 o'clock. They were both healthy in body and mind. Thinking about the fragility of life and the certainty of death, they made their last will and testament. They cancelled all previous wills they had made. Out of marital love and affection for each other, they appointed each other as the sole and universal heir to all their possessions, including movable and immovable property, shares, credits, and rights, with no exceptions, that the first one to die would leave behind.

View transcript 


  • The longest-living spouse would inherit everything the first spouse left behind, wherever it was located or would be found.
  • The longest-living spouse could keep everything and do with it whatever they wanted without having to give anyone an accounting or inventory or pay out anything.
  • This applied whether the first dying spouse had children or descendants or not.
  • If there were children, the longest-living spouse had to raise them properly according to their status and circumstances, have them educated in whatever profession they were best suited for, and either marry them off or provide them with a dowry when they came of age, as the longest-living spouse saw fit.
  • If the longest-living spouse remarried, they had to provide proof to the children regarding the father's or mother's goods in whatever amount the longest-living spouse in good conscience thought appropriate.
  • This proof had to be written and given to such persons as the longest-living spouse wanted to request for this purpose.
  • The testators appointed their child or children as co-heir or co-heirs in this raising, providing, and giving of proof, in payment of their father's or mother's goods or at least of their legitimate portion.
  • The longest-living spouse would in all cases, even when remarrying, remain in possession of the children's proven goods without having to provide any guarantee or security, even if this was required by law or practice, as long as a proper deed was made in case of proof when remarrying or beforehand.
  • They appointed each other as sole and absolute guardian over their minor child or children and as administrator of their goods, with power to do so in case of proof as well as at the final death or also during the life of the last dying spouse if they thought it good.
View transcript 


Willem Veltman, who worked as a ship's carpenter at the East India Company shipyard and lived in Witte Straat, was named in this will. If his daughter (the testatrix, or female will-maker) died first without leaving any descendants, and Willem Veltman was still alive at that time, then the testator (male will-maker) had to pay Willem Veltman his legal share of the inheritance called the legitime portie. The testatrix made her father Willem Veltman a co-heir for only this legitime portie and nothing more. Both will-makers declared this to be their mutual last will and testament, which they wanted to be upheld either as a will or as a codicil (an addition to a will) or as a gift in case of death, whichever legal form would be most valid. The document was made and passed in Amsterdam at the notary's house located at Oude Schans near Korte Koningstraat. The witnesses present were Barent Franse and Gerrit Janse. The document was signed by Elisabeth Veltman, the notary named Boots, Barent Franse, and Gerrit Janse.
View transcript 


On 11 November 1795, a report was read at the meeting from the Commission of Administration of French troops in the Republic of the United Netherlands. The commission stated that, following a resolution from 6 November, they had obtained a free passport for skipper Willem Veltman, who was loaded with provisions, supplies, medicine, and other items. However, the committee found that instead of the 50 barrels of flour mentioned in the passport, the skipper was actually carrying (in addition to the other goods mentioned in the report) 415 barrels of flour. The committee therefore requested that the authorities make the necessary changes to the resolution and passport that were attached to their report, and issue them in corrected form.

View transcript 


The ship Ternesse sailed for Amsterdam with 70 guilders. The crew consisted of: Surgeons: Carpenters:
View transcript 


Pieter and Katrijna Ramak made their will. Due to weakness, Pieter could not sign his name and used a mark instead. They declared that this was their testament and last will, and they wanted it to be followed after their death. They stated that the will should have full legal effect, even if not all legal formalities required by law were properly observed.

The will was made in the presence of Cornelis Gistius and Willem Veltman, who were asked to serve as witnesses. The notary confirmed the document.

View transcript 


The document was made in Amsterdam in the presence of Mr. Hendrik Tatum and Jan Sluijtman, who served as witnesses. Maria Breetel, the wife of Leonard Basius, was also present, along with Leonard Robant, Jan Sluijtman, and notary D. Walschaart.
View transcript 


30 September 1645, Jannetje Verbeek appeared before notary Wilhelmus Silvius. She was the widow of Claes van Houten and his heir according to a will dated 21 August 1684 made before notary Jacob van Hellerus. She lived in the city and was assisted by Dirck Luijk, her son-in-law, who acted as her chosen guardian. She gave power to Gerrit van Houten, who was a water board official of the Eendragtspolder or Groothuis Beijerland, to legally transfer 17 morgen and 203 rods of tithe-free land located in the Eendragtspolder to Gabriel Jannes. The sale price was 6,000 guilders at 85 stuivers and 714 penningen per morgen. She acknowledged receiving 2,000 guilders and would provide security for the remaining 4,000 guilders according to the sale contract passed before the notary on that same day. Witnesses were Pieter Purmerent and Wen Egbringhof. 1 October 1695, Jan Lageman appeared before notary Wilhelmus Silvius. He lived in the Roseboomsteeg and was sick in bed but still of sound mind. He explained that he had been appointed as guardian, replacing Jan Gilles, over the orphaned child of his deceased sister Maria Lagemans, who had been the widow of Christiaan d'Arras and later of Gillis Kruijs, who was the executor of her will. Because he wanted to ensure a capable and honest man from the family would succeed him as guardian and executor, he requested and authorized his brother-in-law Hendrik Visscher for this position, asking the aldermen to approve him and requesting an official record of this.
View transcript 


View transcript 


On 24 April 1690, Dirck van der Groe, a notary, recorded that Cornelis Blesen and an unnamed company appeared before him. They were acting as representatives with power of attorney from Samuel Bertieman, based on documents dated 6 September 1695 and confirmed on 3 October 1696 by Georghs Coluflin, Lolian Fhiomes Rauma, and Htans Jacob Kabis. The power of attorney had been registered on 19 December 1696. The representatives declared they had sold and transferred to Jacob Graaflandt two bonds that were held in the name of the former emperor's authority. These bonds had been received by Cornelis de Langh van Ellemeet in The Hague regarding the trade in quicksilver (mercury), dated 25 August and 1 September 1691. One bond was worth 4,000 guilders (number 500) and the other 2,000 guilders (number 12). The representatives handed over both bonds to the buyer and confirmed that the full amount, including both capital and interest, had been paid. They gave the buyer full ownership and the right to collect any remaining interest. They promised to protect the buyer from any legal claims and waived all their own rights to the bonds. The transaction was witnessed by Ab Leewen and Adrian van Loon.

On 24 April 1692, Dirck van der Groe recorded an agreement involving Jan Teunemans Junior and Elisabeth Climpers, widow of Dirck Teunemans. Jan Teunemans Junior acted as guardian where necessary. Jan and Dirck Teunemans were the children of Jan Teunemans the Elder. They agreed that their father and father-in-law, Jan Teunemans the Elder, could leave his current wife, Maria Jans van Dotmaessen, certain property if he died before her. This included, beyond her regular child's portion according to local law, a sum of 630 guilders in cash, a thick gold chain she wore around her neck, 2 diamond bows she wore as earrings, a gold diamond ring, 3 gold small rings, and silver items she possessed. These items together were valued at 700 guilders, bringing the total to 1,330 guilders. In return, the children promised not to challenge this arrangement after their father's death. However, there was a condition: if Maria Jans van Dotmaessen died without children or descendants from her current marriage or any future marriage, everything except 600 guilders would return to the family line of Jan Teunemans the Elder. Maria Jans could freely dispose of the 600 guilders. If she outlived her husband, she could use all the inherited property during her lifetime, even spend it all, but could only leave 600 guilders by will. No security needed to be provided for this arrangement, as long as her own estate would remain bound to this restitution obligation. The agreement was witnessed by Abraham Leewen and Adrian van Loon, and signed by Joan Teunemans Junior, Elisabeth Climpers, and others.

On 24 April 1698, Hendrick Vesseker and his wife Elre Lagemans appeared before notary Dirck van der Groe. Elre Lagemans was assisted by her husband, who authorized her participation. They both acknowledged they owed Pieter Vergouw a sum of 1,000

View transcript 



Previous pageNext page

Find your ancestors and publish your family tree on Genealogy Online via https://www.genealogieonline.nl/en/