Transcriptions » Recently created summaries of historical documents

Users of Open Archives can have a summary made of the transcriptions created using handwriting recognition.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient to make the historical document understandable. In the transcripts, names are underlined in green and clickable (to search the personal entries on Open Archives for the name in question), the recognized dates have a light gray background and recognized place names have a light purple background.


View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 8189 / 0055  


On 9 August 1723, a report was sent from Macassar regarding debts, expenses, and timber supplies for the Dutch East India Company (VOC):

Regarding sappanwood (a valuable dye wood) for 1724:

The report concluded that all three rulers were unable (or unwilling) to provide sappanwood for the VOC in the coming year.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 8189 / 0047  


View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 8189 / 0045  


On 9 August 1723, a report from Macassar noted several ships arriving due to weather or supply needs:

Another report, signed by H. Walburg on 27 April 1723, listed additional arrivals:

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 8189 / 0053  


In 1723, several ships traveled between Macassar and other ports, carrying goods, people, and animals. Here’s what happened:

Ships that arrived included:

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 8189 / 0051  


On 9 August 1723, a letter from Macassar noted that local kings had agreed not to cut any sappanwood (a valuable red dye wood) in 1724. However, about 3,000 piculs (a weight measure) of uncollected sappanwood remained—2,000 piculs in Dompo (on the trading post Cambo) and 1,000 piculs in Macassar. The writer, A.n Walburg, respectfully requested that authorities arrange for this wood to be retrieved the following year.

A separate note listed ships traveling between Batavia (modern Jakarta) and the East Coast of Java from August 1722 to July 1723:

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 8189 / 0049  


View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1647 / 0652  


In 1701, a report from Macassar discussed the case of Aron Teko, a local ruler causing trouble for the Dutch East India Company (VOC). The situation was complicated because of past agreements and the behavior of other local leaders.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1647 / 0650  


On 13 April 1723, a letter was written from Makassar addressing several issues:

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 8189 / 0009  


View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 8189 / 0007  


This summary covers official records from Maccassar (modern-day Makassar, Indonesia) sent to Batavia (modern-day Jakarta) in 1723 by the Dutch East India Company (VOC). The documents were transported by ships like the Kiefhoek and the Patsjall.

The records also included:

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 8189 / 0005  


In 1701, a report from Macassar was received in Goa on 14 November 1741, detailing gifts sent by the English leader of Banjar to the King of Goa and Carain Bontosoengo. These gifts were accompanied by a letter, which had already been responded to earlier that month. The letter was secretly delivered by a trusted person from Macassar, who traveled quietly without a pass from Goa to Banjar. The contents of the letter remained unknown, as they were kept confidential.

The report also mentioned that, over the past five years, the Portuguese in Timor had occasionally sent gifts to the people of Macassar. However, the Dutch East India Company (VOC) had not been informed about these exchanges. Around four years earlier, a messenger named Mangarij, supposedly Portuguese, had arrived with gifts that included small boxes, pearls, and possibly gunpowder in jars. These jars were not opened, so their exact contents remained uncertain.

The governor thanked Raja Bonij for his openness and recalled reading about similar Portuguese gifts in records from 3 August 1697. He noted this information in his private records, signed by Cornelis Beernink.

In another letter dated 11 November, it was reported that Abraham Holscher, a merchant, had arrived two days before the letter was written. The governor had already responded to an earlier letter from 16 August, but he still needed to reply to a secret letter addressed specifically to him. He trusted that the response would be handled carefully.

The governor also discussed a murder case involving Arouteko and Dain Manbam, which took place on 1 May 1700. The courts of Bonij and Soping had handled the case lightly, suggesting that Raja Bonij might have known about the murder beforehand. The governor believed that Raja Bonij wanted to protect the accused due to their connections, while the VOC aimed to enforce local laws strictly. The governor noted that most allies, except Raja Tello, would follow Raja Bonij's lead in public meetings. He decided not to consult the allies publicly to avoid influencing their opinions, as fear still lingered from past conflicts.

The VOC had urged the courts of Bonij and Soping to resolve the case and punish the murderer appropriately. However, since Aron Lonij refused to pass judgment and the Queen of Soping remained neutral, no other allies could interfere. This left the VOC to handle the matter independently.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1647 / 0648  


In 1701, a report from Macassar revealed tensions between local leaders, the Dutch East India Company (VOC), and the English. Key details included:
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1647 / 0646  


In 1701, a report from Macassar revealed concerns about secret dealings between the English and local rulers. The text describes a meeting involving key figures:

The text highlights growing tensions between the Dutch and English over trade influence in Macassar, with local rulers caught in the middle.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1647 / 0644  


In 1701, a conflict in Macassar (now Makassar) involved two nobles: Arou Teko and Dain Manbanij. The dispute began when Arou Belo accused Arou Teko of murdering his brother. Though the case had initially been settled, tensions rose again when Arou Belo threatened to attack Arou Teko openly. The local governor, Cornelis Deernink, tried to calm the situation and urged Arou Belo to wait for a legal decision. However, the case dragged on due to:

Arou Teko claimed he had justifiable reasons for his anger toward Dain Manbanij and his wife, Saena, accusing them of exchanging love letters while Dain Manbanij was away. Though Dain Manbanij denied any improper relationship, the situation remained suspicious. A temporary peace was brokered by Macassarese mediators, but it didn’t last. Cornelis Deernink believed Arou Teko was at fault for taking justice into his own hands, especially since Dain Manbanij—though of mixed noble and common heritage—did not deserve to be judged by Arou Teko.

The governor considered three possible punishments for Arou Teko:

He stressed that Arou Teko could not go unpunished if justice was to be served for Dain Manbanij’s allies and the royal family.

Later, on August 19, 1701, the King of Boni sent an urgent message to the governor through his clerk, Marcus Santbeek. The king revealed secret intelligence:

The king also mentioned he had avoided visiting the Dutch fort to prevent causing alarm, given the governor’s wife’s illness. He urged swift action against the British threat.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1647 / 0642  


In 1701, Dutch officials in Macassar (now Makassar) dealt with a serious conflict involving local rulers and a murder case. The key figures included:

On January 8, 1701, the governor met with Radja Tello in the VOC’s garden to discuss the case. Radja Tello explained that Arou Teko had killed Dain Mabanij after a reconciliation, which was a betrayal. According to local laws, Arou Teko deserved the death penalty, but the VOC had delayed the execution. Radja Tello warned that further delays risked angering the VOC’s allies, especially the Soping court, who felt justice had not been served.

Radja Tello also noted that while the governor had the authority to enforce the sentence, local rulers expected the VOC to respect their laws. He suggested three possible punishments for Arou Teko:

Cornelis Beernink agreed with most allies that Arou Teko must be punished, though Radja Loubou preferred a heavy fine instead. Beernink believed Radja Boni was secretly pleased the VOC was handling the issue, as he had avoided acting himself. Beernink urged swift action to maintain the VOC’s reputation as a strong ally.

On September 1, 1701, the governor met privately with the king of Boni in the VOC’s garden. The king admitted the case had dragged on too long but claimed he had tried to resolve it. He implied that Dain Mabanij’s family should have sought immediate revenge under local customs. The governor pressed the king for his official stance on Arou Teko’s punishment, but the king avoided giving a clear answer.

The VOC was frustrated that Radja Boni kept delaying, forcing them to take the lead. They feared that if they didn’t act firmly, their local allies would lose trust in them.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1647 / 0640  


In 1701, officials in Macassar discussed the case of Arou Teko, a controversial figure accused of serious crimes. The Dutch governor and local leaders, including the King of Boni and his advisors, debated how to handle his punishment.

The discussion ended with the advisor urging quick action to finally resolve the case.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1647 / 0638  


In 1701, a conflict arose in Macassar involving several key figures:
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1647 / 0636  


On July 11, 1701, in Macassar, Radja Loubou shared secret information with the governor, asking him to keep it confidential. He feared that Arou Lonij, known for his quick temper, would severely punish him if he found out. Radja Loubou also doubted whether others would speak honestly about the matter, as they might change their stories out of fear or self-interest. The governor thanked Radja Loubou for his honesty and promised to keep the conversation private. He then asked for advice on how to handle the situation without breaking local laws.

Radja Loubou explained that Arou Teko, who worked for the Dutch East India Company (VOC), had committed a serious crime by killing someone. According to local laws, too much time had passed to punish Arou Teko with death, but he could still be fined heavily. The fine would be accepted by the allies and the royal family, including the descendants of Soping, whose lineage was highly respected.

The governor had earlier ordered Marcus Santbeek, a bookkeeper, to secretly gather opinions from allies about the killing of Arou Teko and the legal proceedings. On July 9, 1701, Santbeek spoke with Radja Loubou and later reported that Carain Agamonjo, the King of Tanette, had briefly shared his thoughts. Carain Agamonjo believed Arou Teko initially had a just cause but had gone too far by killing Dain Manbanij, making himself guilty of a serious crime. He warned that if Arou Teko wasn’t punished soon, he might flee and cause more trouble for the VOC.

The governor was unsatisfied with this response and wanted the VOC to take stronger action to uphold local laws. He then requested a meeting with Carain Agamonjo to discuss the matter further. When asked, Carain Agamonjo agreed to meet but expressed fear that Radja Bonij would find out and punish him. He also mentioned that past experiences showed the VOC didn’t always protect its allies when conflicts arose.

Santbeek reassured Carain Agamonjo that the governor would support him, but the king remained skeptical, citing past failures by the VOC to intervene in similar cases. Eventually, Carain Agamonjo agreed to meet the governor the next day, July 12, 1701, but planned to tell Queen Dain Tahalille that the meeting was about unpaid debts to avoid suspicion.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1647 / 0634  


On 9 July 1701, at the request of the governor, a local leader named Radja Loubou (also called Datoea Ri Loeboe) visited the governor’s residence in Macassar. He was escorted from the city gate to the governor’s house by Arent van der Mijll, a local official assigned for this task. Upon arrival, Radja Loubou met with the governor in the front room, accompanied by Captain Jan Pietersz Wesselburg and Junior Merchant Ioannes Hackert. He stated that his visit was purely to wish the governor well in his new role. The governor responded politely before offering tea, betel nut, snuff, and dry snacks. At Radja Loubou's request, the governor then took him to his private office (the "ordinary council chamber"). There, Radja Loubou expressed interest in examining the weapons and other curiosities in the room. While he inspected them, the governor closed the door and took the opportunity to privately question Radja Loubou about the opinions of key allies regarding a recent murder case. The case involved Arou Teko, who had killed Dain Mambanij, a prince from Soping, over accusations of adultery with Arou Teko's wife. The governor asked Radja Loubou for his thoughts on the confusing legal proceedings and the verdict agreed upon between the Queen Regent of Soping and Radja Bonij in Chaurana. Radja Loubou responded carefully: The governor pressed further, mentioning rumors that Arou Teko had claimed the murder was done with the knowledge of the late governor Van Thijl and Arou Louij. He asked Radja Loubou if he knew anything about this. The old man replied cautiously:
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1647 / 0632  


On 30 October 1701, a letter was written from Macassar expressing gratitude and hope for support. The writer, Abdul Cadir Radzja Tolok, thanked the recipient for their kindness and described his difficult situation.

The letter was confirmed by Pieter ten Broeck and Halkoen JV Gangel in Batavia on 30 January 1702, stating they had reviewed the letters and found them consistent with their principals' intentions.

The letters were addressed to Abraham van Riebeek, an official of the Dutch East India Company, and were received in two parts: one on 22 November 1701 and the other on 15 December 1701, delivered by a local Macassar resident named Carratoejoe.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1647 / 0626  


View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1647 / 0624  


On 20 October 1701, officials in Macassar wrote to the Dutch East India Company (VOC) leadership in Batavia about several matters:

In a separate letter dated 20 October 1701, local rulers from Bima confirmed receiving VOC gifts, including:

The goods were loaded onto VOC ships bound for Batavia. Payment (6 stuivers per picol) was received by Paduka Radja Bima (the local ruler’s son) and another official from Lieutenant Jacob Astenbroek and bookkeeper Isaac Marmer.

The rulers of Bima sent in return:

The letter was signed in Bima on 9 E joemadel alwal 1113 (local calendar) and received in Batavia on 14 November 1701.

The Macassar letter closed with a formal farewell, signed by seven officials, including Cornelis Deernink, Jacob Claesz, and Joannes Hackaert.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1647 / 0622  


On 21 October 1701, officials in Macassar reported on a long-standing conflict involving the Dutch East India Company (VOC), local allies, and the Mandharese kings over control of the Tomini people.

Additionally, financial matters were addressed:

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1647 / 0620  


View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1647 / 0618  



Previous pageNext page

Find your ancestors and publish your family tree on Genealogy Online via https://www.genealogieonline.nl/en/