Browse transcripts » The Utrecht Archivesarchive access 34-1, inventory number 2214, page 5
Transcription
Brienen
Beek
Bennecom
Broekhuisen
Boonzayer
Bomast
Brienen.
Bree
Berg
Berkhorst
Baerendsen
F
B.
de Heer Hermes
31. 122.
van
Frans)
75.
Dirk en Lubbert
86.
van
96.
Gerrit van
(Gerrit:)
98
106.
(Wouter)
Iuff=r Carolina
122.
Theodora van
Iuff:r Zuzanna de
124. 159 181 200
wed: J: Boone
de Ht:r Gerrit Roelos
vanden) en Marga
reta Buddingh
207.
egtel.
wouter van
333.
(Wouter) en Ten
nisje Helmerden
369.
egte
Claassens
Dirkzen
Deventer
Dolder
Dolder
Deventer
Deventer
Engelenberg
Ede
Ede
I.
Antoinetta)
245.
110
Everdje)
Suffer Anna Reedol.
137 177
phina van
Hendrik van 203
CCra van
307
de H.r Huibert Jan
van, en Mensos
hannes Menso 317. 319
de Heer Huybert
349. 351
Jan van
B
Gerrit van os 39
Oudik van wed
Ryk de Ruyter 76, 141, 187
CCornelis vanen
Anna Maria
de Buyter egtel: 153.
Beek
Bennecom
Broekhuisen
Boonzayer
Bomast
Brienen.
Bree
Berg
Berkhorst
Baerendsen
F
B.
de Heer Hermes
31. 122.
van
Frans)
75.
Dirk en Lubbert
86.
van
96.
Gerrit van
(Gerrit:)
98
106.
(Wouter)
Iuff=r Carolina
122.
Theodora van
Iuff:r Zuzanna de
124. 159 181 200
wed: J: Boone
de Ht:r Gerrit Roelos
vanden) en Marga
reta Buddingh
207.
egtel.
wouter van
333.
(Wouter) en Ten
nisje Helmerden
369.
egte
Claassens
Dirkzen
Deventer
Dolder
Dolder
Deventer
Deventer
Engelenberg
Ede
Ede
I.
Antoinetta)
245.
110
Everdje)
Suffer Anna Reedol.
137 177
phina van
Hendrik van 203
CCra van
307
de H.r Huibert Jan
van, en Mensos
hannes Menso 317. 319
de Heer Huybert
349. 351
Jan van
B
Gerrit van os 39
Oudik van wed
Ryk de Ruyter 76, 141, 187
CCornelis vanen
Anna Maria
de Buyter egtel: 153.
Source citation
The Utrecht Archives, archive number 34-1, Notarissen in de provincie Utrecht, 1617-1895, inventory number 2214, Kantoor Jan Smith en Opvolger Jan Smith, Minuten, met indices, 1780-1811, 1795-1797
Scan
Click on the image to enlarge it and see the transcription next to it
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The transcription was made by computer via automatic handwriting recognition.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.