Browse transcripts » National Archives / Archives South Hollandarchive access 2.10.36.22, inventory number 890, page 13
Transcription
de Rooij, 76. G.
8
Rijnders, 16
13.
Ritsema van Eck, C. R0.
20.
de Ruiter,f
52
Rapparat de
128
de Raadt 822
136
van Renesse Il
181
Henrink
146
van der Stok, Ih.
Smits, Je. G. H.
Sap, H. S.
ten Seldam, R0. 6. 7.
Storm, C. F.
Sollewijn Gelpke, J. S.
Swaters, J. A.
Swarts, P
Stole, A
Magmolen, H. F. 6.
Sollewijn Gelpke, A
Streep,2.
Schoonheijt, R. J. H.
Schimmel, 6.
Smelt, 3. 9. 7.
Sikkens, R.
Schwarx.
de Scoppelaar, P.
Steen Ipi
Simens 61
Severijnen A mw
mil d
Smit 169
Swaring Dijkstra 869
Smil 44
Schabbink 9f
Plagter Ap5p
Siemelink E7
Enepveingers et7
Pampiinon Phol 220
Sijbesma 71.
227
29.
31.
39.
112
413
45
46
48
53
54
59
61
70
48
95
110.
113
117
144
147
179
160
163
171
176
200
207
209
215
8
Rijnders, 16
13.
Ritsema van Eck, C. R0.
20.
de Ruiter,f
52
Rapparat de
128
de Raadt 822
136
van Renesse Il
181
Henrink
146
van der Stok, Ih.
Smits, Je. G. H.
Sap, H. S.
ten Seldam, R0. 6. 7.
Storm, C. F.
Sollewijn Gelpke, J. S.
Swaters, J. A.
Swarts, P
Stole, A
Magmolen, H. F. 6.
Sollewijn Gelpke, A
Streep,2.
Schoonheijt, R. J. H.
Schimmel, 6.
Smelt, 3. 9. 7.
Sikkens, R.
Schwarx.
de Scoppelaar, P.
Steen Ipi
Simens 61
Severijnen A mw
mil d
Smit 169
Swaring Dijkstra 869
Smil 44
Schabbink 9f
Plagter Ap5p
Siemelink E7
Enepveingers et7
Pampiinon Phol 220
Sijbesma 71.
227
29.
31.
39.
112
413
45
46
48
53
54
59
61
70
48
95
110.
113
117
144
147
179
160
163
171
176
200
207
209
215
Source citation
National Archives / Archives South Holland, archive number 2.10.36.22, Inventaris van het archief van het Ministerie van Koloniën: Stamboeken Burgerlijke Ambtenaren, 1836-1936, inventory number 890, Stamboeken van ambtenaren in de koloniën na 1836 / Stamboek van geneeskundige studenten bestemd voor de koloniën, en hun latere dienstverband in de koloniën, met namenklapper
Scan + Transcription
Click on the image to enlarge it and see the transcription next to it
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The transcription was made by computer via automatic handwriting recognition.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.