Browse transcripts » National Archives / Archives South Hollandarchive access 1.05.11.14, inventory number 736, page 561
Transcription
KR
2
. Russen Geinteresserdens
in het Fonds onder P.rectie
Sipar:
Eijgen
van Coopa - „ 24½- 195.352-
Jagien
Luca;
Roos C: Actam . . . . . 130. Speciaal / Ludent - -
Richard Benjamin . . 168. Holkert C. Isaach H=k B: 80. - 15
Raije Van Breukelwaard
Sobre C. Herm=s D=t - - - „ 92.
/Ioa - - - - . . 165. Stap C. Hendrik . - - . . 120.
RobinC:a en Zacharie 318=321.— Terensen /„ Wed=e Pieter - . 123.
323.—
Beijnhold Lomberg en Schorer DofSteven . . . 212.
Schmu
- - . . . 342. Iniklaken C. Maria — 340.
Ricker
- . -.360. Schiieman C: Rijnhold,
RisenZoom Cornelis . - 460.
Lappenberg &. . . 342.
SwanDan . - - - 345.
Schouten Christina en
Martinus . . . . 407.
2
. Russen Geinteresserdens
in het Fonds onder P.rectie
Sipar:
Eijgen
van Coopa - „ 24½- 195.352-
Jagien
Luca;
Roos C: Actam . . . . . 130. Speciaal / Ludent - -
Richard Benjamin . . 168. Holkert C. Isaach H=k B: 80. - 15
Raije Van Breukelwaard
Sobre C. Herm=s D=t - - - „ 92.
/Ioa - - - - . . 165. Stap C. Hendrik . - - . . 120.
RobinC:a en Zacharie 318=321.— Terensen /„ Wed=e Pieter - . 123.
323.—
Beijnhold Lomberg en Schorer DofSteven . . . 212.
Schmu
- - . . . 342. Iniklaken C. Maria — 340.
Ricker
- . -.360. Schiieman C: Rijnhold,
RisenZoom Cornelis . - 460.
Lappenberg &. . . 342.
SwanDan . - - - 345.
Schouten Christina en
Martinus . . . . 407.
Source citation
National Archives / Archives South Holland, archive number 1.05.11.14, Inventaris van het digitaal duplicaat van de notariële archieven van Suriname, 1699-1828 (1836), inventory number 736, REGISTERS VAN AKTEN, GEREGISTREERD TER SECRETARIE, Register van procuraties, attestaties en contracten, 1779 feb. 25 - 1783 sep. 4
Scan + Transcription
Click on the image to enlarge it and see the transcription next to it
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The transcription was made by computer via automatic handwriting recognition.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.