Browse transcripts » National Archives / Archives South Hollandarchive access 1.05.11.14, inventory number 4, page 17
Transcription
Jan de Nessij Anna Engelbregt
Jovis Jonnenberg & Vrouw - - —
Johanna Elisabeth v: Jandijk . . 1
Jan lindeman besloot Test: . . . 3
Johanna Catrina Prmintam: And: Dinconie 36-
Johannes Campen; petronella Josina
van Enthoven - - —4
Jacob Banckert
.. —
—
van hondj swartshoff ——
Johanna Van deijl; . . .
Britton—
J:v: boogsr: Carlossa van limsinge q
7
Johan Christiaen Eberhard. In
anne Maria Cleenpilt
Isak Pieravan.
-—
Jan hendrik Streijnard
van V=tn Bosseh, Maria Magiftor 59
1
puneg
komnel vaasak
Johan Adriaan Hermans
Japper sluijter, en Cornelia knof 61
Jan Jurrie Carnar
Jan pis sy Mana Janis
Isaek Levij, en Sara Moses —6
Jan Gerrit Creuger—
9
Isaek Josephh belogrado -7
Jovis Jonnenberg & Vrouw - - —
Johanna Elisabeth v: Jandijk . . 1
Jan lindeman besloot Test: . . . 3
Johanna Catrina Prmintam: And: Dinconie 36-
Johannes Campen; petronella Josina
van Enthoven - - —4
Jacob Banckert
.. —
—
van hondj swartshoff ——
Johanna Van deijl; . . .
Britton—
J:v: boogsr: Carlossa van limsinge q
7
Johan Christiaen Eberhard. In
anne Maria Cleenpilt
Isak Pieravan.
-—
Jan hendrik Streijnard
van V=tn Bosseh, Maria Magiftor 59
1
puneg
komnel vaasak
Johan Adriaan Hermans
Japper sluijter, en Cornelia knof 61
Jan Jurrie Carnar
Jan pis sy Mana Janis
Isaek Levij, en Sara Moses —6
Jan Gerrit Creuger—
9
Isaek Josephh belogrado -7
Source citation
National Archives / Archives South Holland, archive number 1.05.11.14, Inventaris van het digitaal duplicaat van de notariële archieven van Suriname, 1699-1828 (1836), inventory number 4, MINUUT-AKTEN, GEPASSEERD TER SECRETARIE, Testamenten, codicillen en akten van opening van besloten testamenten benevens besloten testamenten, 1720
Scan + Transcription
Click on the image to enlarge it and see the transcription next to it
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The transcription was made by computer via automatic handwriting recognition.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.