Browse transcripts » National Archives / Archives South Hollandarchive access 1.05.11.14, inventory number 199, page 18
Transcription
10
13.
Batterie by 't Kruyt Magazyn.
van 6. H: Calibr: — - 1. Canon op defecte Assugt.
495. Caron Coogels.
In 't Kruyt Magazyn.
Grof Kruyt — 3800. Ht:
Tyn Kruyt - 25.tt.
Lont - - 315. Bosjes.
Nogh bevinden sig diverse tot de Artillerie
behoorende Gereetschappen.
1. Book met syn toebehoor.
1. voor Waagen.
2. Domkragten.
12. Koevoeten.
1. Harke.
6. Kruytkisten.
1. Vifitier yser.
2. Coopere Dijssels.
1. Dito Mess.
1. Dito Ophaalen.
1. dito Vuijlbeek.
1. Handseeger.
In de Bedekte weg bevinden Sig nogh
3. Canons van 24. tt: Calibr: op de Grond en
1. Canon van 6. lt: Calibr: soo nogh op
geene Fatterie verdelt syn.
13.
Batterie by 't Kruyt Magazyn.
van 6. H: Calibr: — - 1. Canon op defecte Assugt.
495. Caron Coogels.
In 't Kruyt Magazyn.
Grof Kruyt — 3800. Ht:
Tyn Kruyt - 25.tt.
Lont - - 315. Bosjes.
Nogh bevinden sig diverse tot de Artillerie
behoorende Gereetschappen.
1. Book met syn toebehoor.
1. voor Waagen.
2. Domkragten.
12. Koevoeten.
1. Harke.
6. Kruytkisten.
1. Vifitier yser.
2. Coopere Dijssels.
1. Dito Mess.
1. Dito Ophaalen.
1. dito Vuijlbeek.
1. Handseeger.
In de Bedekte weg bevinden Sig nogh
3. Canons van 24. tt: Calibr: op de Grond en
1. Canon van 6. lt: Calibr: soo nogh op
geene Fatterie verdelt syn.
Source citation
National Archives / Archives South Holland, archive number 1.05.11.14, Inventaris van het digitaal duplicaat van de notariële archieven van Suriname, 1699-1828 (1836), inventory number 199, MINUUT-AKTEN, GEPASSEERD TER SECRETARIE, Inventarissen en prisaties (taxaties), 1756 juli - sep
Scan + Transcription
Click on the image to enlarge it and see the transcription next to it
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The transcription was made by computer via automatic handwriting recognition.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.