Browse transcripts » National Archives / Archives South Hollandarchive access 1.05.01.02, inventory number 632, page 18
Transcription
Zwing /Alexander)
Eerbergh Hermanus
Eiving (Tames
Evreys Iames/
„ 1
„ —„—
8
0
2
—„—„—„ —„—„1
2
2
„1
„1„1
„ —„—„—„
-„1
Tidler / Alexander
Francard Iaques
Kogantij Thomas
Freare John
Frankina /Jooehh
Karguson John
Fabry John
Francis Tames
Fransniet Tames
Frmmiel Pieter
Fabio Penantio
Konseka M: G:
Pleisman Iorich
Fenton /Meikel
Fairchild Robin
Francisco John
Francuti Temmy
Tourtado / David R:
„1
„ 1
„ 3
„1
„1
„3
„—
„ 1„ 2
4
—„
3„
1
5
P
d
„
51
1
3
„
2
„3
„ —
—„1
—„—„—„
3
1
„
—„
„s
2
-„1
–„
—„—
—„—
—
—„
–„3
—
„
—„
2„1
„1
—„—„—„—„—
2
„s
—„—„
—„
-„1
—„
„
—„—„—
„1
3
1
—„—
„1
1
3
„ —„
-„
1
—„—
—
„
—„
–„ —
„2
1
C.
17
1
K
1
1
N
0
p
1
R
15
D
D
W
7
—
Eerbergh Hermanus
Eiving (Tames
Evreys Iames/
„ 1
„ —„—
8
0
2
—„—„—„ —„—„1
2
2
„1
„1„1
„ —„—„—„
-„1
Tidler / Alexander
Francard Iaques
Kogantij Thomas
Freare John
Frankina /Jooehh
Karguson John
Fabry John
Francis Tames
Fransniet Tames
Frmmiel Pieter
Fabio Penantio
Konseka M: G:
Pleisman Iorich
Fenton /Meikel
Fairchild Robin
Francisco John
Francuti Temmy
Tourtado / David R:
„1
„ 1
„ 3
„1
„1
„3
„—
„ 1„ 2
4
—„
3„
1
5
P
d
„
51
1
3
„
2
„3
„ —
—„1
—„—„—„
3
1
„
—„
„s
2
-„1
–„
—„—
—„—
—
—„
–„3
—
„
—„
2„1
„1
—„—„—„—„—
2
„s
—„—„
—„
-„1
—„
„
—„—„—
„1
3
1
—„—
„1
1
3
„ —„
-„
1
—„—
—
„
—„
–„ —
„2
1
C.
17
1
K
1
1
N
0
p
1
R
15
D
D
W
7
—
Source citation
National Archives / Archives South Holland, archive number 1.05.01.02, Inventaris van het archief van de Tweede West-Indische Compagnie (WIC), (1624) 1674-1791 (1800), inventory number 632, 1778 apr. 27 - 1778 okt. 21
Scan + Transcription
Click on the image to enlarge it and see the transcription next to it
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The transcription was made by computer via automatic handwriting recognition.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.