Browse transcripts » National Archives / Archives South Hollandarchive access 1.05.01.02, inventory number 1243, page 49
Transcription
113.
Debet Willem van Citters.
Aan Cornelis van Citen, dor de Erfenamen. P: C: A: 176 „130 ƒ 166
Megast:
1757
11
Samuel Bautter.
Debet
£ 46613
Aan Helena de Witte, door Corn: de Witte bij Procuratie P:o P P: 214: ƒ 124
Maert
28
1747
Moses Abrabanel.
Debet
2 Junij Aan Leendert Bomme, door Bouwse en swante bij proc: L:l C: P: 3 . ƒ 1262: 172 14
1742
13. 4
4
5
1737
1737
ult:o
Willem van Citters.
Decemb:
Per Balans van’t Capitaalboek L:a A: F:o 93
Samuel Bautte
u8 Decemb:
Ter Balans van’t Capitaal boek L:a A N: 96
Moses Abrabanel.
1737 ul:o Decemb: Per Balans van’t Capitaalboek L:a A: F: 96
£
13
Credit
13
464
Credit
Do 466
Credit
£ 472
14
4.
5
4
113
Debet Willem van Citters.
Aan Cornelis van Citen, dor de Erfenamen. P: C: A: 176 „130 ƒ 166
Megast:
1757
11
Samuel Bautter.
Debet
£ 46613
Aan Helena de Witte, door Corn: de Witte bij Procuratie P:o P P: 214: ƒ 124
Maert
28
1747
Moses Abrabanel.
Debet
2 Junij Aan Leendert Bomme, door Bouwse en swante bij proc: L:l C: P: 3 . ƒ 1262: 172 14
1742
13. 4
4
5
1737
1737
ult:o
Willem van Citters.
Decemb:
Per Balans van’t Capitaalboek L:a A: F:o 93
Samuel Bautte
u8 Decemb:
Ter Balans van’t Capitaal boek L:a A N: 96
Moses Abrabanel.
1737 ul:o Decemb: Per Balans van’t Capitaalboek L:a A: F: 96
£
13
Credit
13
464
Credit
Do 466
Credit
£ 472
14
4.
5
4
113
Source citation
National Archives / Archives South Holland, archive number 1.05.01.02, Inventaris van het archief van de Tweede West-Indische Compagnie (WIC), (1624) 1674-1791 (1800), inventory number 1243, 1737 dec. 31 - 1791 dec. 31
Scan + Transcription
Click on the image to enlarge it and see the transcription next to it
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The transcription was made by computer via automatic handwriting recognition.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.