Browse transcripts » National Archives / Archives South Hollandarchive access 1.05.01.02, inventory number 1243, page 14
Transcription
Anna Elisabet Radaus.
Debet
Aan Daniel Pulleken, inhuijwelik hebbende Anna Iacoba van santen 2 16417 471
21
Decem:
1744
Jacob van Nispen.
Debet
Aan Pieter Iapper van Nijpen, door Gvan de Cappelle P:a P:r S: 237 - A22 166
16 Decemb:
1748
ebet Sara Fruijttier weduwe
1738
21
April Aan Leendt: en Ian bomme Iacobz: weesen van Anna de Pattre L:a N:s 3
15 ƒ 242
6
13
10
4
—
1737
1737.
1737
Anna Elisabet Radaus
1l: Decemb:r
Per Balans van’t Capitaal boek L:a A: P:o 53
Jacob van Nispen.
UE: Decemb:r Per Balans van’t Capitaalboek L:a A: F:s 53
Jan Babtista de Pattre.
Ul= Decemb: Per Balans van’t Capitaalboek L:a A: F: 53
37
Credit
£ 471
6
Credit
L 46613
redit
10
L 23
4
10
Debet
Aan Daniel Pulleken, inhuijwelik hebbende Anna Iacoba van santen 2 16417 471
21
Decem:
1744
Jacob van Nispen.
Debet
Aan Pieter Iapper van Nijpen, door Gvan de Cappelle P:a P:r S: 237 - A22 166
16 Decemb:
1748
ebet Sara Fruijttier weduwe
1738
21
April Aan Leendt: en Ian bomme Iacobz: weesen van Anna de Pattre L:a N:s 3
15 ƒ 242
6
13
10
4
—
1737
1737.
1737
Anna Elisabet Radaus
1l: Decemb:r
Per Balans van’t Capitaal boek L:a A: P:o 53
Jacob van Nispen.
UE: Decemb:r Per Balans van’t Capitaalboek L:a A: F:s 53
Jan Babtista de Pattre.
Ul= Decemb: Per Balans van’t Capitaalboek L:a A: F: 53
37
Credit
£ 471
6
Credit
L 46613
redit
10
L 23
4
10
Source citation
National Archives / Archives South Holland, archive number 1.05.01.02, Inventaris van het archief van de Tweede West-Indische Compagnie (WIC), (1624) 1674-1791 (1800), inventory number 1243, 1737 dec. 31 - 1791 dec. 31
Scan + Transcription
Click on the image to enlarge it and see the transcription next to it
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The transcription was made by computer via automatic handwriting recognition.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.