Browse transcripts » National Archives / Archives South Hollandarchive access 1.05.01.02, inventory number 1239, page 13
Transcription
5
1750.
1724
29
126
Debet
Abraham Biskop Filius Philippij
Debet:
Michiel Vernoorten
3
Ianuarij Aan David Verwout Noiret: door hem en P: Boddaert. L.a Q. F: 11.
Debet
rederick Huijssen
Debet
Perus Becide Predipant
october A: Francois van Wechelen tot Rotterdam p„r Procuratie- s:o 178.
A: Pieter Meridits, tot London p:r procuratie op. Hend:k van den bergs„
dito:
134
59 l
59 l.
L
ƒ 500
45
45
90
Credit
rijmo„
Ianuarij p:r Capitael Boeck Van L:e A: overbrenge t' saldo
p=r
F
1723
gjm
vede
1723
Januarij p:r Capitael Boeck Van L:n A: overbrenge t' saldo.
F
redit
trijmo
1723
Januarij p:r Capitael Boeck van L: A: overbrenge t' saldo:
F
Credit
Vrijmo
1723 p=s Januarij p:r Capitael Boeck Van L:a A: overbrenge t' saldo - - P
57 L
55 L
59 L
54 L
259
500
90
45
2
3
1750.
1724
29
126
Debet
Abraham Biskop Filius Philippij
Debet:
Michiel Vernoorten
3
Ianuarij Aan David Verwout Noiret: door hem en P: Boddaert. L.a Q. F: 11.
Debet
rederick Huijssen
Debet
Perus Becide Predipant
october A: Francois van Wechelen tot Rotterdam p„r Procuratie- s:o 178.
A: Pieter Meridits, tot London p:r procuratie op. Hend:k van den bergs„
dito:
134
59 l
59 l.
L
ƒ 500
45
45
90
Credit
rijmo„
Ianuarij p:r Capitael Boeck Van L:e A: overbrenge t' saldo
p=r
F
1723
gjm
vede
1723
Januarij p:r Capitael Boeck Van L:n A: overbrenge t' saldo.
F
redit
trijmo
1723
Januarij p:r Capitael Boeck van L: A: overbrenge t' saldo:
F
Credit
Vrijmo
1723 p=s Januarij p:r Capitael Boeck Van L:a A: overbrenge t' saldo - - P
57 L
55 L
59 L
54 L
259
500
90
45
2
3
Source citation
National Archives / Archives South Holland, archive number 1.05.01.02, Inventaris van het archief van de Tweede West-Indische Compagnie (WIC), (1624) 1674-1791 (1800), inventory number 1239, 1723 jan. 1 - 1776 juli 4. Met losse index
Scan + Transcription
Click on the image to enlarge it and see the transcription next to it
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The transcription was made by computer via automatic handwriting recognition.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.