Browse transcripts » National Archives / Archives South Hollandarchive access 1.04.02, inventory number 10046, page 211
Transcription
Naam Lijste van de ondervolgende Luxembur¬„gers Militairen die onder heedigen Lato in weezen be„
„vonden zijn, Teweeten.
232. Coppen in Het Geheel Daar van.
95. Coppen van de Comp: van Delmillac, als.
1. De Feid - - - - -
1. De Menerville
1. Andre Mahu - - -
1. Francois Thibessard
1. Jeans - Chapelin devillenewve - - --
1. Pant Bigure - - -
1: fidel Collard
-
7. Jean Baphule Duchene _
1. Jean Baptiste Chapites - - - - _
1. Leonard Marechal
1. francois Richard
1. Jean Gaillard
1. Jean Julien Charpentier - - - - Corporael
1. fabien Lebernere - - - - --
1. Pierre Bonheur - - - - - -
-.
1. Charles fromentin - - - - - Tamboer.
1. Jean Baptiele Raijmond - - - _„o
1. Pierre Manjot - - - - - - Fusilier
1. Jean Baptiste Ergasant - - - _o
1. Etienne Bervee - - - -
1. Jean Goud
1. Pierre Ronhard - - - - - —
1. Etienne Bordek - _:o
1. francois Jartivelle - - - - - Zergiant
1. Noes Laplante. . . . . _=o
1. Louis Cazaneau _:o
1. Nicolaes Aungre - - - - _:o.
1. De Legrevisse - - - - - - _=o Luijtenant
—
95. 30. Coppen Die Transporteere.
Luijtenant
_o
_o
_o
_o.
_o
_o
_o.
t
_o
_o
-.
_o
_
— – - – – – – – sous _o
- – – – – - Fourier
1. Delmillac - - - - - - - Capitain Commandant
1. Leijrie - - - - - - - - aijde Chirurgie
-
—
—-—
—
– – – – – – –
— - - -
-.
—— -.
- — - _o—.
—
——
—
-
_
Bronvermelding
National Archives / Archives South Holland, archive number 1.04.02, Inventaris van het archief van de Verenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie (VOC), 1602-1795 (1811), inventory number 10046, Kamer Zeeland, INGEKOMEN STUKKEN VAN DE KANTOREN IN INDIE BIJ DE HEREN XVII EN DE KAMER ZEELAND, Stukken van de gouverneur en raden van Ceylon, Missiven van de gouverneur en raden van Ceylon aan de kamer Zeeland. Gedeeltelijk kopieën, 1788 jan. 31 - feb. 16Scan
Click on the image to enlarge it and see the transcription next to it
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The transcription was made by computer via automatic handwriting recognition.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.