Browse transcripts » National Archives / Archives South Holland
Transcription
Regiment DEnsie.
1. Battallon
Hiaruthus Gravr P'lunvre Grmnadirs, 61, 106: 4
Heery Lannoy. 55, 929, 16.
Fredorik Baron van Williken, 55, 929, 16.
Francois George Durant.. 55, 929, 16
Johan Dand. De Pararicons De Cop.
pelli. 55, 929, 16
Lambort Jot Gantnek genaamte.
Tongnagel.
55, 929, 16
Johan Hendrik van Hangwits 55, 929, 16.
Regimont, Dienvie.
2e. Battaillon.
Guidien Salomon Deuts Grenadirs. 61. 1106: 4.
Willem Cagel Snouckaart. 55, 929, 16
Cornalis van Gheel van Spanbrck, 55, 929, 16
Mattheus Tonnemans. 55, 929, 16
Piter Franken.
55, 929, 16.
Hou:doih. Phlip honhaet van
Schenburg.
35, 929, 16
Homnsdtrvans Suytsman.. 55, 929, 16
1. Battallon
Hiaruthus Gravr P'lunvre Grmnadirs, 61, 106: 4
Heery Lannoy. 55, 929, 16.
Fredorik Baron van Williken, 55, 929, 16.
Francois George Durant.. 55, 929, 16
Johan Dand. De Pararicons De Cop.
pelli. 55, 929, 16
Lambort Jot Gantnek genaamte.
Tongnagel.
55, 929, 16
Johan Hendrik van Hangwits 55, 929, 16.
Regimont, Dienvie.
2e. Battaillon.
Guidien Salomon Deuts Grenadirs. 61. 1106: 4.
Willem Cagel Snouckaart. 55, 929, 16
Cornalis van Gheel van Spanbrck, 55, 929, 16
Mattheus Tonnemans. 55, 929, 16
Piter Franken.
55, 929, 16.
Hou:doih. Phlip honhaet van
Schenburg.
35, 929, 16
Homnsdtrvans Suytsman.. 55, 929, 16
Source citation
National Archives / Archives South Holland, archive number 1.01.02, Inventaris van het archief van de Staten-Generaal, (1431) 1576-1796, inventory number 8236, De bijlagen bij de resoluties van de Staten-Generaal / De ingekomen delen en dossiers, afzonderlijk verzameld in series / De staten van oorlog te land en ter zee / Ordinaris en extraordinarisstaten van oorlog te land en ter zee / 1764
Scan + Transcription
Click on the image to enlarge it and see the transcription next to it
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The transcription was made by computer via automatic handwriting recognition.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.