Browse transcripts » National Archives / Archives South Holland
Transcription
Regiment Lintman.
1t. Battaillon
Hendrick van Lintman Grenadirs, 61, 1106, 4
Francois Lous Gaudot. 55, 929, 16
Adriaan Mekern. 55, 929, 16.
Jan Carcl van der Heijden De
Gouda.
Johan Matthuys Stadelman. 55, 929, 16
Gerardis Jacobi.
55, 929, 16
55, 929, 16.
Fredink Cugistosfel Willem Lode.
wyk Graaf van Bylant., 55, 929, 16
Regiment Lintman.
2e. Battaillon
Willem SHhucorij Grenadirs. 61. 1106: 4
Henry Bedaulk.
55, 929, 16
Albot Slteypuer. 55, 929, 16
Christffel Albert van Hamor,
Steid.
45
55, 929, 16.
Johanns Honicus Giotnorig., 55, 929, 16.
Arthir Hollont.
10, 55, 929, 16.
Jacob Nicolaas D' Osoro., 55, 929, 16.
1t. Battaillon
Hendrick van Lintman Grenadirs, 61, 1106, 4
Francois Lous Gaudot. 55, 929, 16
Adriaan Mekern. 55, 929, 16.
Jan Carcl van der Heijden De
Gouda.
Johan Matthuys Stadelman. 55, 929, 16
Gerardis Jacobi.
55, 929, 16
55, 929, 16.
Fredink Cugistosfel Willem Lode.
wyk Graaf van Bylant., 55, 929, 16
Regiment Lintman.
2e. Battaillon
Willem SHhucorij Grenadirs. 61. 1106: 4
Henry Bedaulk.
55, 929, 16
Albot Slteypuer. 55, 929, 16
Christffel Albert van Hamor,
Steid.
45
55, 929, 16.
Johanns Honicus Giotnorig., 55, 929, 16.
Arthir Hollont.
10, 55, 929, 16.
Jacob Nicolaas D' Osoro., 55, 929, 16.
Source citation
National Archives / Archives South Holland, archive number 1.01.02, Inventaris van het archief van de Staten-Generaal, (1431) 1576-1796, inventory number 8236, De bijlagen bij de resoluties van de Staten-Generaal / De ingekomen delen en dossiers, afzonderlijk verzameld in series / De staten van oorlog te land en ter zee / Ordinaris en extraordinarisstaten van oorlog te land en ter zee / 1764
Scan + Transcription
Click on the image to enlarge it and see the transcription next to it
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The transcription was made by computer via automatic handwriting recognition.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.