Browse transcripts » National Archives / Archives South Holland
Transcription
Regiment Nassau Utsingen
1e. Battaillon.
Cardl Willem Pronce van Nassau
Utsengen Grenadirs. 61. 1106. 4
Francois Alexander Lchrbach, 55, 929, 16
Joseph van Egg. 55, 929, 16
Beatus van Maillot.. 55, 929, 16.
Victor Amadeus, Prins van Anhalt 55, 929, 16.
Adam Frederk van Dehl. 55, 929, 16.
Philip Eonst Erpel.. 55, 929, 16.
Regiment Saxen Gotha
Hertog Frederik van Saxen Gotha
Grenadiers. 49, 936, 4
Prins Ernst Luduwich van Saxen
Gotha Grenadirs. 49, 936, 4.
Maurits Hendrik van Stangen, 49, 881.
H: Heylig. 49, 881.
Maximiliaan, Augustus van
Gengenbach. 49, 881,
Frederk Willem Brendel. 19, 881.
F: J: Rupprecht. 49, 881.
A: Avianus.
49, 881,.
De Weyhe. 49, 881.
Jan Christiaan Beijer.. 49, 881. ,
1e. Battaillon.
Cardl Willem Pronce van Nassau
Utsengen Grenadirs. 61. 1106. 4
Francois Alexander Lchrbach, 55, 929, 16
Joseph van Egg. 55, 929, 16
Beatus van Maillot.. 55, 929, 16.
Victor Amadeus, Prins van Anhalt 55, 929, 16.
Adam Frederk van Dehl. 55, 929, 16.
Philip Eonst Erpel.. 55, 929, 16.
Regiment Saxen Gotha
Hertog Frederik van Saxen Gotha
Grenadiers. 49, 936, 4
Prins Ernst Luduwich van Saxen
Gotha Grenadirs. 49, 936, 4.
Maurits Hendrik van Stangen, 49, 881.
H: Heylig. 49, 881.
Maximiliaan, Augustus van
Gengenbach. 49, 881,
Frederk Willem Brendel. 19, 881.
F: J: Rupprecht. 49, 881.
A: Avianus.
49, 881,.
De Weyhe. 49, 881.
Jan Christiaan Beijer.. 49, 881. ,
Source citation
National Archives / Archives South Holland, archive number 1.01.02, Inventaris van het archief van de Staten-Generaal, (1431) 1576-1796, inventory number 8222, De bijlagen bij de resoluties van de Staten-Generaal / De ingekomen delen en dossiers, afzonderlijk verzameld in series / De staten van oorlog te land en ter zee / Ordinaris en extraordinarisstaten van oorlog te land en ter zee / 1757
Scan + Transcription
Click on the image to enlarge it and see the transcription next to it
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The transcription was made by computer via automatic handwriting recognition.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.