Browse transcripts » National Archives / Archives South Holland
Transcription
Wotvolk
Riegiment Orange Gelderland
1e. Bataillon
Syn Hooghid dan Heer Prince van brange
on Natan Grenadirs., 61, 106, 4
Walther Htendrck de Roode van Heekeren, 35, 929, 161
Adolph de Rood van Hackeren., 55, 929, 16.
Albregt Gran van Stirum. 55, 929, 16.
Anthon Fredanck van Emphal., 55, 929, 16.
Jacob Bather.
Jan Guillam Stichor.
55, 929, 16.
15, 929: 16
2e. Battaillon.
Willm van Brochuysen Grenadirs. 61, 106. 4-
Huronomus Linder. 55, 929, 16
Wolruad Lumoraal Rataris van
35, 929, 16.
Weldren.
Fridrnk Jacb van der Capplle. 55, 929, 16.
Lick Jan van Sippel. 55, 929, 16.
Hendrck Jan van de Londen. 55, 929, 16.
Jan van Niel.
55, 929, 16.
Riegiment Orange Gelderland
1e. Bataillon
Syn Hooghid dan Heer Prince van brange
on Natan Grenadirs., 61, 106, 4
Walther Htendrck de Roode van Heekeren, 35, 929, 161
Adolph de Rood van Hackeren., 55, 929, 16.
Albregt Gran van Stirum. 55, 929, 16.
Anthon Fredanck van Emphal., 55, 929, 16.
Jacob Bather.
Jan Guillam Stichor.
55, 929, 16.
15, 929: 16
2e. Battaillon.
Willm van Brochuysen Grenadirs. 61, 106. 4-
Huronomus Linder. 55, 929, 16
Wolruad Lumoraal Rataris van
35, 929, 16.
Weldren.
Fridrnk Jacb van der Capplle. 55, 929, 16.
Lick Jan van Sippel. 55, 929, 16.
Hendrck Jan van de Londen. 55, 929, 16.
Jan van Niel.
55, 929, 16.
Source citation
National Archives / Archives South Holland, archive number 1.01.02, Inventaris van het archief van de Staten-Generaal, (1431) 1576-1796, inventory number 8222, De bijlagen bij de resoluties van de Staten-Generaal / De ingekomen delen en dossiers, afzonderlijk verzameld in series / De staten van oorlog te land en ter zee / Ordinaris en extraordinarisstaten van oorlog te land en ter zee / 1757
Scan + Transcription
Click on the image to enlarge it and see the transcription next to it
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The transcription was made by computer via automatic handwriting recognition.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.