Browse transcripts » National Archives / Archives South Holland
Transcription
Tractementen
Johan Werner Baron van Pallant
Lt. Gen:: vande Onfanterije, 366: 13: 4.
Otto Fred: van Wittinghoff ltt
genl vande Cavallerije, op Gene=
Majors Traetta 42 2 3, 183: 6: 8:
Edmond van Els Getl. Major
vande Infanterije-4 180: 6: 8.
Dirk van Linden Hee van Baskelf 103, 6: 8.
Nicolaes Steven van Haersoltent. Major, 55: :
Edmond van Els, Collonel, 180: 6: 8:
Anthonij Swaen, St. Collonae, 73: 6: 8:
Frederik van Slatho, St. Major, 55:
Gijsbert van Welderen, Collonel, 103: 6: 8.
Alexander Gansneb genaamt
Tegnagel, St. Collonel, 73: 6: 8.
Jacob van Brakelot Major, 55:
Dick van Haersolte van Vrft,
Collonee
Allard Gansneb genaemt
Tegnagel, Lt. Collonee=, 73: 6: 8.
Johan van Cranenburgh
St. Major
55::
, 183: 6: 8:
Johan Werner Baron van Pallant
Lt. Gen:: vande Onfanterije, 366: 13: 4.
Otto Fred: van Wittinghoff ltt
genl vande Cavallerije, op Gene=
Majors Traetta 42 2 3, 183: 6: 8:
Edmond van Els Getl. Major
vande Infanterije-4 180: 6: 8.
Dirk van Linden Hee van Baskelf 103, 6: 8.
Nicolaes Steven van Haersoltent. Major, 55: :
Edmond van Els, Collonel, 180: 6: 8:
Anthonij Swaen, St. Collonae, 73: 6: 8:
Frederik van Slatho, St. Major, 55:
Gijsbert van Welderen, Collonel, 103: 6: 8.
Alexander Gansneb genaamt
Tegnagel, St. Collonel, 73: 6: 8.
Jacob van Brakelot Major, 55:
Dick van Haersolte van Vrft,
Collonee
Allard Gansneb genaemt
Tegnagel, Lt. Collonee=, 73: 6: 8.
Johan van Cranenburgh
St. Major
55::
, 183: 6: 8:
Source citation
National Archives / Archives South Holland, archive number 1.01.02, Inventaris van het archief van de Staten-Generaal, (1431) 1576-1796, inventory number 8161, De bijlagen bij de resoluties van de Staten-Generaal / De ingekomen delen en dossiers, afzonderlijk verzameld in series / De staten van oorlog te land en ter zee / Ordinaris en extraordinarisstaten van oorlog te land en ter zee / 1721
Scan + Transcription
Click on the image to enlarge it and see the transcription next to it
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The transcription was made by computer via automatic handwriting recognition.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.
The summary is created by the computer based on a language model.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient so that the historical document becomes understandable.