Browse transcripts » National Archives / Archives South Holland
Summary (also from the next page)
Captain Geleijn Pietersz Belckbanger commanded a ship called the White Lion. It could carry 90 loads and was armed with 6 metal pieces, 12 cannons, and 8 stone guns. The ship had a crew of 70 people who received monthly wages of 780 and cost money of 682-10. This new ship replaced a previously wrecked vessel. A different replacement ship needed 70 crew members with monthly wages of 780 and cost money of 682-10. Another new ship, replacing Captain Calis's wrecked vessel, required 85 crew members with monthly wages of 885 and cost money of 828-15.
Transcription
Capiteijn Geleijn Pietersz
Belckbanger, voerende
t'schip genaemt den witten
Leeuw. groot 90. lasten ge„
monteert met
6 Netale stucken
12. Gotelingen
8 steenstucken
Gemant met 70. hooffden
trecken ter maent aen
soldie780
Coostgelt 682-10
Els
Den nieuw Schip in plaets
van het verongeluckte
Schip.
.
.
te monteren met
Temannen met behooffde.
treckende ter maentaen
soldie630-.
Coostgelt 585.
1215.
1462 10
Belckbanger, voerende
t'schip genaemt den witten
Leeuw. groot 90. lasten ge„
monteert met
6 Netale stucken
12. Gotelingen
8 steenstucken
Gemant met 70. hooffden
trecken ter maent aen
soldie780
Coostgelt 682-10
Els
Den nieuw Schip in plaets
van het verongeluckte
Schip.
.
.
te monteren met
Temannen met behooffde.
treckende ter maentaen
soldie630-.
Coostgelt 585.
1215.
1462 10
Source citation
National Archives / Archives South Holland, archive number 1.01.02, Inventaris van het archief van de Staten-Generaal, (1431) 1576-1796, inventory number 8053, De bijlagen bij de resoluties van de Staten-Generaal / De ingekomen delen en dossiers, afzonderlijk verzameld in series / De staten van oorlog te land en ter zee / Ordinaris en extraordinarisstaten van oorlog te land en ter zee / 1633
Scan + Transcription
Click on the image to enlarge it and see the transcription next to it
Artificial Intelligence 
The transcription was made by computer via automatic handwriting recognition. The summary is created by the computer based on a language model. Neither of these methods is perfect, but they are often more than sufficient to make the historical document understandable. The results of the application of (European) artificial intelligence have not been verified by a human.