Transcriptions » Recently generated summaries of recognized texts

On September 5, 1736, a case was heard concerning a watch sale. The plaintiff had to swear under oath that he had truly sold a watch to the defendant for 100 rijksdaalders, with interest of 8 rijksdaalders per month until full payment. After taking this oath, the defendant was ordered to pay the court costs. The judgment was made on Wednesday, August 29, 1736 by the Council of Justice, consisting of:

• Jacob van den Bosch (Master)
• Jacob Lakeman (Master)
• Theodorus van Revenhoust (Master)
• Hendrik Haak
• Adriaan Maten Albertsz
• Adrianus Bengsma (Advocate Fiscal of India)

The document was signed by secretary G. Schuijlenburg. The case involved Nicolaas Jongsma (Master) as plaintiff against Gijsbertus Schuijlenburg (acting as trustee in the bankrupt estate of deceased junior merchant Balthazar Corevaar), along with Willem van Zeijl (junior merchant) and Jan Schreuder.

On September 5, 1736, Theodorus van Reverhorst, Hendrik Haak, and Adriaan Maten Albertsz, members of the Council of Justice in Dutch East Indies, presided over a case. The council secretary was Gijsbertus Schuijlenburg. The case involved Adriaan van Namen, an assistant to the Dutch East India Company, as plaintiff, and Cornelis van Hamme, a bookkeeper for the same company, as defendant. The case originated from a claim filed on July 13, 1735. After reviewing all documents submitted by both parties, the Council ruled in favor of the plaintiff. They ordered the defendant to pay 237 rijksdaalders and 24 stuivers to the plaintiff for various goods and borrowed money.

On March 18, 1662, two sisters appeared before notary Pieter van Buijten in Amsterdam. They were Annetge Pieters, wife of Igle Annes, and Neeltge Pieters, wife of Jan Meijndenten. They declared that their late sister Marritge Piters, who had been married to skipper Joris Thebbes, had on her deathbed verbally given them all her clothes, both linen and woolen. Their brother-in-law Joris Thebbes had agreed to honor his late wife's wishes. The sisters acknowledged receiving all the mentioned clothing from their brother-in-law to their complete satisfaction. They promised never to make any legal claims about this matter. The document was witnessed by Maximiliaen Jansz and Barent Eykertsz.

On September 3, 1736, a ruling was made regarding cases filed in India. The original claim was filed on September 18, 1734, with a counter-claim following on October 16, 1734. A verdict was reached on May 18, 1735, followed by an appeal on June 15, 1735.

The Council, representing the States General of the United Netherlands, reviewed all documents from both parties. They upheld the original verdict, dismissed the appeal, and ordered the appellant to pay all legal costs.

The ruling council consisted of:

• Isaac van Schinne (Extraordinary Councilor of India and president)
• Jacob Lakeman
• Bernhard de Heeren
• Jacob Dellaffaille
• Willem Vincent Helvetius

On September 5, 1736, a legal case was heard involving payment of 57 rijksdaalders for drinks delivered. The court ruled on August 29, 1736 with judges Jacob van den Bosch, Jacob Lakeman, Theodorus van Reverhorst, Hendrik Haak, and Adriaan Maten Alberts. Adrianus Bergsma served as fiscal advocate of the Indies. Gijsbertus Schuijlenburg was the court secretary.

The case involved:

• Abraham Gaspersz, a lieutenant of an indigenous company
• Anna Hendriks, widow and heir of indigenous citizen Bastiaan Bastiaansz (according to a will passed before notary Carel Schoute on December 26, 1732)

On June 27, 1665, Jacob Adriaensz, a ship's captain living in Lamburgh, appeared before Notary Van Buytere. He declared that he owed his brother-in-law Captain Douwe Volckers, who also lived there, 200 guilders for money he had borrowed and received. As security for this debt, he transferred to his brother-in-law the right to collect 200 guilders from money and funds that were due to him from his parents' inheritance on the island of Wieringen. Jacob gave up his portion of these outstanding funds to his brother-in-law and promised to uphold this transfer at all times, pledging his person and goods as security. This was done in Amsterdam in the presence of witnesses Adriaen van Santen and Laren Darius.

In court, Johannes Brundel was assigned legal power as guardian and administrator, which was requested by his relative Jan S. Brunder.

On September 5, 1736, the High Council of the United Netherlands approved a criminal sentence. They rejected the defendant's appeal and charged him with the costs of the case. The ruling was made on September 4, 1736 by the following judges:

• Jacob van den Bosch
• Jacob Lakeman
• Bernhard Jacob Dellafaille
• Willem Vincent Helvetius
• Theodorus van Reverhorst

The document was signed by clerk Jongsmagesw and secretary Gijsbertus Schuijlenburg. The case involved Andries Mooren, a citizen, against Jan Jurgens, who was a substitute for sheriff Justinus Vink. The case began on March 7 of the same year, and the Council ruled in favor of the plaintiff's demands.

On September 5, 1736, the Council reviewed a legal case between Sale and Morong that had started in September 18, 1734 in stede (town). The case had previously received a verdict on May 16, 1736. Sale then filed an appeal on June 20, 1736. The Council carefully examined all documents from both the original case and the appeal process.

• Jacob van den Bosch
• Jacob Lakeman
• Bernhard Jacob Dellafaille
• Willem Vincent Helvetius
• Theodorus van Reverhorst

On September 5, 1736, a court case was heard in appeal regarding a dispute between Sale and Morong. The case originated from a request made on September 18, 1734, followed by a verdict on May 16, 1736. The appeal was filed on June 20, 1736. The Council reviewed all documents from both the original case and the appeal carefully before making their judgment.

• Jacob van den Bosch
• Jacob Lakeman
• Theodorus van Reverhorst
• Hendrik Haak
• Adriaan Maten Albertsz

On September 5, 1736, the East India Company servant Arij Doedesz and Huijbert van Bazel, a clerk at the general secretary's office, who had power of attorney from bookkeeper Iacobus Lindeborn and citizen Carel Sleem from around here, along with other known and unknown creditors, appeared in court regarding an insolvent estate. The Council carefully considered all claims and demands of the creditors. Acting in the name of the High Mighty Lords States General of the United Netherlands, they ruled that:

1. First, the legal costs of the sequestrator must be paid
2. Second, citizen Carel Sleem should receive 344 rijksdaalders plus monthly interest of half a rijksdaalder per cent, starting from October 3, 1731 until full payment is made, based on a loan agreement signed before notary Ioan van Visvliet

On September 1, 1736, in Netherlands, several court officials made a legal ruling. The High Council of the Dutch East Indies, led by President Isaac van Schinne, along with council members Jacob Lakeman, Bernard Jacob Della Faille, Theodorus van Reverhorst, Hendrik Haak, Adriaan Maten Albertsz, and Gerrit Joan Rengers, approved a previous verdict. The case involved:

• The confiscation of a fine
• A dispute over an insolvent estate of a deceased ship captain
• The appointment of secretary Gijsbertus Schuijlenburg as trustee of the estate
• A complaint by clerk Nicolaas Jongsma

The complainant was ordered to pay the legal costs of the proceedings.

On September 5, 1736, a case was heard regarding wills dated September 20, 1728 that were drawn up before notary Petrus Dobbelaar and witnesses in Italy. The case involved aldermen of the city and multiple parties. A claim was filed on April 25, 1733, followed by a verdict on September 4, 1734. A subsequent appeal was filed on November 24, 1734. The Council reviewed all documents submitted by both parties from both the initial case and the appeal.

• Jacob Lakeman
• Bernhard Jacob Dellafaille
• Willem Vincent Helvetius
• Theodorus van Revenhorst
• Hendrik Haak
• Adriaan Maten Albertsz

On September 5, 1736, a court decision was made regarding a legal request filed on July 10, 1734. The case involved a previous verdict from March 12, 1735 and an appeal made on April 20, 1735. The Council of the States General of the Netherlands carefully reviewed all documents submitted by both parties. They upheld the original verdict and declared that the appellants were not wronged. The court ordered the appellants to pay all legal costs from their own private funds, which could not be charged to the estate of Jacob van de Cust.

On September 5, 1736, a legal case was heard before several judges in the Council of Justice in Batavia. The council members present were:

• Jacob Lakeman
• Bernhard Jacob De Clafaille
• Theodorus van Revenhoust
• Hendrik Haak
• Adriaan Maten Albertsz
• Gerrit Ioan Rengers

The case involved Gijsbertus Schuijlenburg, the council's secretary, against Eronimus Slot, a cavalry officer of the citizens' militia, and Jonas van Batavia. These men were universal heirs, along with the deceased merchant Marcus van den Briel (who worked for the East India Company), of the late Jacob van de Cust. The other party in the case was Alida Beck, widow of Marcus van den Briel.

On September 5, 1736, on behalf of the High and Mighty Lords States General of the United Netherlands, a court ruling was made about a loan dispute. The defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff 700 rijksdaalders at 48 stuivers each. This debt came from a loan agreement dated January 25, 1736, which was signed before notary Ioan de Brouwer. The defendant had two options:

1. Pay the full amount plus half a percent monthly interest from the date of the original agreement until complete payment
2. Keep the principal amount but provide special collateral in the form of a property with three buildings located outside the Rotterdam gate in the Oosterveld area (being the 7th part of block L). This property was originally purchased according to a deed dated October 14, 1735

The defendant was also ordered to pay the legal costs. The verdict was confirmed on September 1, 1736 by Isaac van Schinne Junior, extraordinary councilor of the Indies and president.

On September 5, 1736, a legal judgment was made by the Council of Justice in Dutch East Indies. The ruling was made by several council members including the president, extraordinary councilor of India Isaac van Schinne, and council members Jacob Lakeman, Bernhard Jacob Dellafaille, Willem Vincent Helvetius, Theodorus van Reverhorst, Hendrik Haak, and Adriaan Maten Albertsz. The case was presented by secretary Gijsbertus Schuijlenburg and involved a dispute between Brouwer, widow of Reverend Cornelis Ninaber, and Abraham Bieswanger, an assistant in service of the East India Company. The case was filed on May 9, 1736.

On September 5, 1736, the Council of the High and Mighty Lords States General of the United Netherlands reviewed a legal case. The case had started on February 14, 1735 and had another hearing on May 14, 1735. A verdict was given on February 7, 1736, followed by an appeal filed on April 18, 1736. After carefully examining all documents from both the first case and the appeal, the Council upheld the original verdict. The appealing party lost their case and had to pay all legal costs of the appeal process.

On September 5, 1736, Secretary of the Council Gisbertus Schuijlenburg made a legal complaint against two native citizens, Moses Cornelis and Jansz. Both were jointly liable for a debt. They were the initial defendants but later became plaintiffs in a counter-claim. They appealed their case, seeking relief from time limits. On the other side was Abraham Gaspersz, a lieutenant of a native company, who was initially the plaintiff but became defendant in the appeal case. The case was heard before the aldermen of the city.

On September 5, 1736, the Council ruled on a debt case. The defendant was ordered to pay 62 rijksdaalders and 24 stuivers for delivered goods, plus monthly interest of 2/8 rijksdaalder per hundred until full payment. The ruling was made on August 29, 1736 by a council of judges consisting of:

• Jacob van den Bosch
• Jacob Lakeman
• Theodorus van Revenhoust
• Hendrik Haak
• Adriaan Maten Albertsz
• Adrianus Bengsma (fiscal advocate)

The plaintiff was required to swear an oath confirming the accuracy of the submitted invoice. After taking this oath, the defendant would also have to pay the court costs.

On September 5, 1736, a legal judgment was made in a case involving multiple parties. The president of the court was Isaac van Schinne Junior, and the council members included Jacob van den Bosch, Jacob Lakeman, Hendrik Haak, and Adriaen Moten. Gijsbertus Schuijlenburg served as secretary. The case involved Samuel Smels, a soldier in the East India Company, and Geertruijda de Haan, who was the widow of Jan Philibert. Philibert had been a senior merchant and chief administrator of the medical store at the castle. The case originated from a claim filed on March 4 of that year, and the final decision was made on August 27, 1736.

• They canceled entries from February 21-24 and March 10
• They removed all charges from March 31, April 7, and May 5-6 related to visits and expenses
• They canceled entries from May 31 worth 337 reichsdaalders and 6 stuivers for inventory and administration fees
• They reduced charges for four notices dated January 29, February 2, and February 29, totaling 13 reichsdaalders
• They decreased another account to 600 reichsdaalders
• The defendant was ordered to pay the remaining balance with 8% interest starting from May 2 of that year until full payment