Transcriptions » Recently generated summaries of recognized texts

Fully AI-GeneratedUsers of Open Archives can have summaries generated from the recognized texts (transcriptions) produced through text recognition (OCR) and handwriting recognition (HTR). Neither of these artificial intelligence tasks is perfect, but they are often more than sufficient to make the historical document understandable. In the transcripts, names are underlined in green and clickable (to search the personal entries on Open Archives for the name in question), the recognized dates have a light gray background and recognized place names have a light purple background. The results of the application of (European) artificial intelligence have not been verified by a human.


At sea and in the Øresund, from June 13 to June 17, events unfolded as follows:
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.01.02 / 8385 / 0039  


During September 15, several deaths were recorded from a battle and from illness. Those who died from illness included Simon Cornelissen from Risnk, Jacob Jacobsz Schrael, and Olfert Gerritsz from Enkhuizen. Those killed in battle included Jan Sijmonsz Semeijn, Cornelis Barentsz from Somerdijk, Jan Lon from Langesond, Hans Wiede from Fum, Cornelis Cornelissen from Langendijk, Willem Michielsz from Maerland, Cornelis Classen Block from Amsterdam, and Bruijn Becker from Meltemob.

On September 24, more casualties were recorded. Pieter Cleensmidt died from illness, while Floris Poulusz from Amsterdam, Hans Malleman from Danzig, and Barent Adriaensz from Amsterdam were killed in battle.

The document also lists several wounded sailors including Jan Borms from Middelburg, Jacob Liddel from Lied, Abraham Willemsz from Whitby, Hendrick Joosten from Enkhuizen, and Jan Jansz Graft who was later transferred to Haarlem.

The casualties were spread across several ships:

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1132 / 0209  


In Amsterdam on April 29, 1656, several legal documents were signed: On May 1, 1658, Andries Pouwelsz van Holstein filed a complaint through notary Adriaen Lock against Juriaen Laubengier, stating that:
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 965394 / 282  


On March 11, 1659, Juriaen Laubengier, a merchant living in Amsterdam, appeared before notary Adriaen Loock. Laubengier had received transfer rights from Johan Kemp the elder, who was the father and sole heir of his deceased son Johannes Kemp. This transfer was dated February 23.

In this capacity, he sold and transferred a bond of 300 riksdaalders with 5% yearly interest to Harmen van Santburger who lived in Rees. This bond was originally dated September 10, 1656 and was payable by the city of Rees. The bond was initially in the name of Christianus Rademaker, a medical doctor, who was the guardian of his deceased brother Bartramus Rademaker's underage children. On July 23, 1658, this bond was transferred to Johannes Kemp.

Laubengier acknowledged receiving full payment from Harmen van Santburger for both the principal amount and interest. Van Santburger received full ownership rights to collect all current and future payments on the bond. Laubengier gave up all rights to the bond and promised to protect the transfer against any future claims.

The document was witnessed by Jacob Wornos and Jacobus Snel in Amsterdam and officially recorded by notary Adriaen Lock.

View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 965438 / 370  


On June 13, 1659, Jean Penneman, aged around 51 years and living in Amsterdam, made a sworn statement before notary Adriaen Lock. The statement was requested by Juriaen Laubengier, also a resident of Amsterdam.

Penneman testified about events from around 1650, concerning Isabelle Fredericx, who was married to Johannes Kemp. She was renovating her house located on the Oudezijds Achterburgwal near the Stoofbrug at that time.

According to the testimony, Fredericx had heard rumors that people were saying she was using her husband Kemp's money for the renovations. She strongly denied this to Penneman, declaring she was using her own money. She even stated that if there was even a single beam in the house paid for with her husband's money, she wished the devil would immediately tear it out.

The statement was witnessed by Jacobus Snel and Dirck vander Groe.

View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 965438 / 847  


On May 25, 1690, several craftsmen made statements about work done in 1649 on a house located at the Oudezijds Achterburgwal near the Stoofbrug in Amsterdam. The craftsmen were: They testified at the request of Juriaen Laubengier that they had repaired and rebuilt the house belonging to Belitgen Fredricx, wife of the late Johannes Kemp. The first three craftsmen worked as masters, while Gerrit Jacobsz was the senior apprentice of Baerent Pietersz Veenedael, who was then the master carpenter. All work was done according to Belitgen Fredricx's instructions, without any involvement from her husband Johannes Kemp. She personally paid the craftsmen for their work. The improvements included: The craftsmen confirmed these renovations significantly improved the house's value. The statement was witnessed by Hendrick Pleur and Warnaer Kerckringh and recorded by notary Adriaen Lock.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 965438 / 755  


On June 12, 1652, Johannes Kemp, a merchant in Amsterdam, requested through a notary to meet with the widow of Albert Eggericx, who was also a notary in the city. Kemp had previously asked the widow and heirs of the late Willem van Dalen to hand over all documents, papers, writings, and notes concerning matters between himself and Juriaen Laubengier. Van Dalen's son had told Kemp that when he was abroad, her late husband had taken these documents, claiming he had Kemp's permission.

Since these documents were of great importance to Kemp, he asked the widow through the notary whether:

The widow responded that she had not seen any such writings or papers in her late husband's office or among his papers. She stated she had not given them to anyone, including Juriaen Laubengier, and did not know where these papers and documents were. This was witnessed by Hendrick Geelehant and Govert Lacher, and recorded by public notary A. Lock.

View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 965417 / 485  


On April 5, 1643, Andries Paulszen owed money for various goods from Lautreecke, amounting to 528 guilders, 17 stuivers, and 8 pennies. Later that year for half cloths sold, he owed 447 guilders and 4 stuivers. On November 19, 1645, for half cloths from Daniel Witte, he owed 377 guilders, 7 stuivers, and 8 pennies, totaling 1353 guilders and 3 stuivers.

On May 12, 1646, 125 guilders were paid, leaving 1228 guilders and 9 stuivers outstanding. Several payments were made through Hans Moller in May and June, including payments of 50, 50 again, and 149 guilders, with a final payment of 756 guilders.

On September 21, 1656, Hendrick Hendricxsz Westhhalen (aged about 46) and Geurt Ringelenbarch (aged about 55), both residents of the city, appeared before notary Adriaen Lock. They certified that they had examined the original account and confirmed the signature belonged to Juriaen Laubengier, having seen him write and sign documents multiple times. The notary Lock also confirmed knowing Laubengier's signature from previous encounters. This was witnessed by Hendrick Geelesant and Jacobus Snel in Amsterdam.

View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 965435 / 252  


In March 1734, a meeting took place between officials in Malabar. The prince had not spoken to the King about certain matters that were important to the Cochin kingdom. The prince claimed the King did not need to be consulted because he (the prince) had given his word. The Commander requested the prince to convince the King to agree, to satisfy their High Nobles.

Later, on April 24, 1734, at another meeting between Paljetter and the Commander, they discussed matters concerning Innemalka. When Paljetter visited the King that morning, the King anticipated questions about Innemalka and the withdrawal of his Nayars from Mangatti. The King's response was that all lands would belong to the temples and the Chialour house.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 9017 / 1917  


Laomrong, ruler of Soppeng and relative of the King of Tanette, was driven out in 1611. The leaders of the rebellion were Ambona S. Salenka (son of the previous ruler), his brother Sive Tenkang, Datoe Lampoela (half-brother of the king of Sidenreng), and Lapatonis (former King of Tanette). Laomrong was supported by Bone where he was raised, and by Laroempang, King of Tanette and his grandfather. On August 16, 1644, a major battle occurred in Soppeng where the Bone party was defeated, with several princes either killed or wounded. The Governor reported on July 10, 1645 that if Bone continued to suffer defeats, the party that caused problems in 1642 and 1643 might resurface. This could lead to: The Governor argued that while non-intervention should be maintained as long as possible, there might come a time when the government's interests would require decisive intervention. This would be necessary if Bone could not avoid humiliation without intervention, and if failing to help would result in either the fall of the current administration or the loss of their goodwill.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 2.10.01 / 4510 / 0129  


On July 10, 1645, S. Salenke and Datoe Lampoela were leading war efforts in Ambon while the council of Wadjo remained neutral. The government of Wadjo consisted of 40 princes who ruled independently without a supreme ruler. During conflicts with neighboring kingdoms, some princes would support one side while others supported the opposing side, without this affecting their relationships within Wadjo.

This situation made lasting peace in Celebes difficult. When Wadjo's help disturbed peace in an allied land, a carefully selected commission would be sent to the council of Wadjo. They would explain that such actions by council members were as harmful to the Government's allies and peace in Celebes as if the council itself had declared war.

On July 18, 1645, the Government expressed its desire to end this harmful situation. While assuring peaceful intentions toward Wadjo's council, they requested that individual princes stop attacking neighboring kingdoms immediately and prevent such actions in the future. If this reasonable request was not followed, it would be seen as an act of hostility from Wadjo that could lead to retaliation.

If this diplomatic approach failed, the following measures could be taken:

These measures would be effective because Wadjo's prosperity depended mainly on trade, and wealthy merchants had significant influence on the country's affairs.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 2.10.01 / 4510 / 0135  


On October 9, 1752, from Macassar, Jacobs as secretary sent a letter from the orphans' chamber to the authorities in Batavia containing books and financial records, including those of the church welfare office. The letter was sent from Castle Rotterdam in Macassar.

On Thursday, April 6, 1752 at 8:30 in the morning, after prayers, the governor called a meeting primarily to discuss supply requirements for Bima and other matters concerning the overseas territories. They decided to send as many provisions and supplies as they could spare, along with 4,000 rijksdaalders - half in new Dutch currency and half in large denomination coins.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 2799 / 0184  


Several documents and reports were sent from Macassar on September 9, 1752 and October 9, 1752. These included:

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 2799 / 0182  


On October 9, 1752, a dispute was recorded in Macassar at Castle Rotterdam between Major Adolph Henrik Julius Weerman and Lieutenant Jan Christoffel Schindelhouwer. This matter was referenced in resolutions from June 19 and July 29.

Officials including J. de Clootwijk, A.H.J. Weerman, B. Petzoed, J.N. Stampeel, J.H. Voll, and A. Ravensberg sent documents to Governor-General Jacob Mossel. These papers were transported on the Company's vessel "De Zwaluwe" under chief navigator Jan van der Meer.

The documents included:

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 2799 / 0180  


On February 23, 1705, in Ternate, officials wrote about dealings with local rulers. The Dutch East India Company wanted to:

Company workers were instructed to treat locals, especially leaders, as friends and allies without showing superiority. The text mentions concerns about the King of Tidore and activities of junior merchant Hofman, who sailed on ships called de Schaapharder and de Kuijker to Pattani and Maba to destroy nutmeg trees and inspect the islands of Gebe, Salawati, and Misool. There were worries about:

This was detailed in a letter dated June 17 (year not specified).

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 7622 / 0462  


In Ternate on February 23, 1705, officials discussed gifts and trade agreements regarding spices. A gift was prepared for Prince Kitchil. The success of spice trade negotiations depended on the King of Tambocko, who needed to be approached first due to previous offenses. The rulers of Bouton were expected to cooperate and show respect to the King of Ternate according to the contract from 1667, which was signed with the Dutch East India Company during King Mandaasaha's reign. The gifts for the King of Tidore included: These items were to be presented when the prince would take over his father's kingdom and sign contracts with the Dutch East India Company. Previous letters from December 13 and the 6th detailed plans for spice control. The company found it difficult to prevent spices from reaching foreign hands due to: The document concludes that the best approach would be to gain willing cooperation from these rulers and their people, rather than trying to enforce control through force.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 7622 / 0460  


On February 23, 1705, in Ternaten, officials discussed Spanish diplomatic missions. These included visits from Don Thomas Mallappas in 1703 and two lieutenants in May 1704. They doubted the sincerity of Spanish requests for land to build a fortress in Simioaij. They believed these missions were actually meant to spy on Dutch activities.

The text mentions that people from Magindanao tried to maintain relationships with both the Spanish and the Dutch East India Company to benefit from both. The Emperor and his nobles claimed they only wanted friendship with the Dutch East India Company.

The document discusses correspondence between the kings of Ternaten, Tidoren, and Batchian. It mentions sending gifts in return for received wax, noting that these return gifts should be of greater value.

The letter also addresses conflicts between Bouton and Tambocko. The King of Ternaten was asked to send 2 or 3 of his nobles to examine complaints and help resolve hostilities between these regions. The deposed king apparently caused much trouble in this conflict. The Dutch East India Company was to send a capable official to assist in the peace process, working together with representatives from Macassar.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 7622 / 0458  


On February 23, 1705 in Ternaten, officials discussed several matters concerning the relationship with the Magindanao emperor and Sulu. The company decided to decline military assistance requests from the Magindanao emperor, who had asked for:

The company approved small gifts to maintain friendly relations with the ruler and his nobles, aiming to discourage them from dealing with other European nations. They approved compensation for refreshments given to commissioners Keller and Stuijt during their stay.

The company also approved sending one of their available small ships with suitable commissioners to:

The text also mentions financial matters, including approval for reimbursement of 311.11 guilders for native schoolteachers on the northern islands and 300 pounds of unnecessarily spent gunpowder with muskets.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 7622 / 0456  


On February 23, 1705, officials in Ternate discussed several maritime matters. A pepper-carrying ship needed to stop at Bouton with various supplies. The ship 'Schaapharen' was approved for preparation. Another vessel departed carrying additional goods and remaining soldiers, including Europeans and 25 Papangers (soldiers from Pampanga). Ships were instructed to wait at Boulon Comba near Bonthain for further orders from the governor and council, as per the letter of December 13. They acknowledged receipt of letters dated June 17, July 19, and September 20 of the previous year. The officials discussed the dispatch of the yacht 'Schaapharen' with 2 months of supplies and 12 sailors to rescue the yacht 'Harderinne'. This was based on reports from 2 Chinese individuals who claimed the vessel was stranded at Manganitoe on Sangir Island due to sick crew members. However, this report proved false. On March 20 of the previous year, Sebastian Keller (junior merchant) and Abraham Stuijt (bookkeeper) returned after a 7.5-month journey through the northern islands and Manado. Their record-keeping was criticized as disorganized and deficient. Their actions on the Talaud, Sangir, and Siau islands were deemed inappropriate, and their explanations were considered unsatisfactory. Officials were waiting for further reports about how this matter was handled.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 7622 / 0454  


Here is the English summary in HTML:

On February 23, 1705, a report was written in Ternate about sending a ship called the Schaapharen with supplies and pepper plants to Bouton. The ship carried 15 Europeans and 25 Papangers (soldiers) as recruits. These ships were to return during the eastern season and stop at Bouton to pick up slaves, then proceed to Bulo Comba in the Bonthain bay to await orders from the governor and council of Macassar.

The document acknowledges receipt of letters dated June 17, July 19, and September 20 of the previous year. It discusses sending the yacht Schaapharen with 2 months of supplies and 12 sailors to rescue another vessel, the Harderinne, which according to two Chinese sources was reportedly stranded at Manganito on Sangir island due to sick crew members. This report turned out to be false.

On March 20, after 7.5 months, junior merchant Sebastian Keller and bookkeeper Raham Stuijt returned from their Magindanao mission via the outer islands and Manado. Their record-keeping was criticized as messy and incomplete, making their logbook unreliable. Their wasteful behavior and inappropriate conduct on the Talaud, Sangir, and Siau islands was noted in letters and a resolution dated July 8, for which they were to face consequences.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 7622 / 0452  


On February 17, 1703, a message was sent from Cape of Good Hope regarding releasing Intje Poetij from his banishment. A small ship called the Taxisboom was being prepared to transport tea and other goods, expected to be ready by the end of the month. Due to the late season, ship captains were allowed to bypass the Cape if not absolutely necessary, as happened the previous year with the Noortgouw, which successfully passed St. Helena.

Intje Poetij, a Malay who was part of rebel Jonker's following in 1690, had been sent to the Cape on the ship Kortgene with others. Upon request from his friends, he was released from his banishment and could return at the first opportunity.

The document was signed by several officials including J. van Hoorn, A. van Riebeek, L. Pijl, and others at Batavia Castle on February 17, 1705. The letter was sent via the ship Oestgeest to Cape of Good Hope, addressed to Governor Willem Adriaan van der Stel and his Council.

The document included:

The document ends with information about the ship Handboog being sent to Ternaten to Governor Pieter Roselaar and his Council, following an earlier message sent on the Peperboom.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 7622 / 0450  


On February 10, 1705, a document originating from Macassar dated November 17, 1704 contained various administrative items. These included:

The document was signed by C. Besuijen at Batavia Castle. It mentions that the ship Oestgeest was preparing to depart with cargo valued at 270,101.3.8 for the Amsterdam Chamber, to join three other vessels. This was communicated to Willem Adriaan van der Stel, the governor at Cape of Good Hope.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 7622 / 0448  


On February 10, 1705, a register of documents was prepared in Macassar for transport aboard the ship Eenhoorn. The documents were handed to Jan Jacob Erberveld for delivery to Willem de Roo, who was appointed as: The register included:
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 7622 / 0446  


On July 14, 1761, gifts were received from high officials, for which heartfelt thanks were given. A male slave named Biludu was sent to the Company, described as being worth as little as a fleeing chicken. This was written on June 9, 1761.

The king of Biga requested assistance with boats to transport him from his village to Gorontalo, due to hostilities from the Mandharese, Buginese, and Pelopper people who were enslaving and selling his subjects. After discussion, this was approved pending the resident's considerations.

King Mono Arca had paid resident Witewaal 120 riksdollars for 12 rifles received in 1758. A letter dated May 20 was read from King Andries Manabon of Candhar, stating he had returned to his old residence from Hoadakal. He complained strongly about Prince Kudarati and his family's continued rebelliousness, as well as Prince Manganka's subjects, over which he was in a legal dispute with the king of Taboekan.

Following government authorization, he had prepared a boat to send the rebels to the capital, but they had armed themselves and threatened to kill the king and his family, causing great turmoil in his village. After observing this situation patiently for some time, he sent his ensign Daworij to ask why they sought to kill him. They responded that the weapons were only prepared to protect their houses, which led him to request the Taboekan Commander's help.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 3022 / 0757  


Here's the HTML summary of the historical Dutch text:

On July 14, 1761, a letter discussed gold deliveries to the resident of Manado, stating this should be done without involvement of Princess Manilha. It ordered that a corporal and two soldiers stationed there to collect gold dust should be provided with good housing protected against criminals. Two local workers should help the Europeans daily with tasks like fetching water and chopping firewood, and stay in the fort all day.

The governor presented a letter to the kings of Gorontalo dated June 8-9. This was a Malay letter in Arabic characters from King Muhammad Alemudie Iskandar Monoarfa Johan Palawan Berdaulat Safiola and Tadjoedien Siradjoelalam Katjil Kilat and their nobles, addressed to Governor Jacob van Schoonderwoert and the council of the Moluccas.

The letter acknowledged receipt of gifts and a message from April 25 about accepting back people from Lambok. They thanked the Company for returning a woman named Illolodie who had been mistreated by a governor. They reported completing a fortress except for its door, and were waiting for bricks and tiles to finish storehouses in Gorontalo and Limbotto.

The kings reported that the king of Biga requested help with boats to evacuate his people to Gorontalo due to hostilities from Mandharese, Buginese and Pelopper pirates who were enslaving his subjects. They awaited instructions on this matter.

King Mono Rafa separately reported paying 120 rijksdaalders on June 6, 1174 (Islamic calendar) to Resident Wittewaal for 12 rifles received in 1758, requesting this debt be removed from Company books.

View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 3022 / 0755  



Previous pageNext page

Find your ancestors and publish your family tree on Genealogy Online via https://www.genealogieonline.nl/en/