Blader door transcripties » Nationaal Archief / Rijksarchief Zuid-Holland

archieftoegang 2.10.01, inventarisnummer 2310, pagina 9

delivered hit opinion, That the faets op the
illicit Hassio in Slaves had been gully„
provedl=eind also Nhat it hadt been„
proveed the Schorners Dutch Papers hadd
beer Ahroionoven bourc during ihe tirne of
her being chused und just before she
was boaided by thre baptiuing Thips
Boat, and Mat the Hieuch, Pupers produced
weze fa the parpoise op cliking dhe
nefurious tiansaction unden the Flag
of Anariee, Nherefore he wat of opinira,
the blecim given should be rejecteel and
that the said Schoonen being subject
aud liable to confiseation should be
condemned as laiosul. Vrige, aud the
Pluves ou boaid Emancipated.
Wbis Metherland Majestij, Sudg
delivered his opinion=that the Sehoouer
brought befou the bouit for cetjudication
was not a Duteh Vessil=theit the
proofs in the base wese not string
enoughe to allois him to join in
opinion
opinion with Wbis Buitannia Mejestijs
suilge, vnd that she was not consequentli„
subject aud liable to confiscation, andt
het could not agnee to condenin her„
Wbis Buitannie Majiotijs Aibitiaha
staked, theat in consequense of the
difference of opiniou entertained by
Vois Britaninie Majestijs and Hois
Netheiland, Majestijs sudges=and in
the absence if eu Aibitiatoi ou the
part of Vois Majesty the Ring of the
Retherlauds the duty devolved upon
hini of stating thiat taking, dhe. loissure
produeed into due consideration he
was of opinion with Vois Baitannie
Meijestijs sudge, that it had been
provide that thie said Schoonen had
Dutch Papers, which were thirwnover=
=bourel during, tre chase o the saicl
Gehoonen bi the Bapturing Phip, end
thal the Faeuch Cupers prodicaed
were for the purpose, if eovering the
illieit