Users of Open Archives can have summaries generated from the recognized texts (transcriptions) produced through text recognition (OCR) and handwriting recognition (HTR). Neither of these artificial intelligence tasks is perfect, but they are often more than sufficient to make the historical document understandable. In the transcripts, names are underlined in green and clickable (to search the personal entries on Open Archives for the name in question), the recognized dates have a light gray background and recognized place names have a light purple background. The results of the application of (European) artificial intelligence have not been verified by a human.
Thomas van der Velde, a shipwright at the East India Company shipyard, and his wife Elisabeth Veltman, living on Wittenburg in the small street in Amsterdam, appeared before notary Johannes Boots on April 2, 1723 in the evening at 6 o'clock. They were both healthy in body and mind. Thinking about the fragility of life and the certainty of death, they made their last will and testament. They cancelled all previous wills they had made. Out of marital love and affection for each other, they appointed each other as the sole and universal heir to all their possessions, including movable and immovable property, shares, credits, and rights, with no exceptions, that the first one to die would leave behind.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320271 / 161
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320271 / 162
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320271 / 163 On 11 November 1795, a report was read at the meeting from the Commission of Administration of French troops in the Republic of the United Netherlands. The commission stated that, following a resolution from 6 November, they had obtained a free passport for skipper Willem Veltman, who was loaded with provisions, supplies, medicine, and other items. However, the committee found that instead of the 50 barrels of flour mentioned in the passport, the skipper was actually carrying (in addition to the other goods mentioned in the report) 415 barrels of flour. The committee therefore requested that the authorities make the necessary changes to the resolution and passport that were attached to their report, and issue them in corrected form.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.01.02 / 1730 / 0937
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1902 / 0489 Pieter and Katrijna Ramak made their will. Due to weakness, Pieter could not sign his name and used a mark instead. They declared that this was their testament and last will, and they wanted it to be followed after their death. They stated that the will should have full legal effect, even if not all legal formalities required by law were properly observed.
The will was made in the presence of Cornelis Gistius and Willem Veltman, who were asked to serve as witnesses. The notary confirmed the document.
View transcript NL-HlmNHA / 5843012 / 365
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320373 / 297
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320284 / 359
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 1510898 / 91 On 24 April 1690, Dirck van der Groe, a notary, recorded that Cornelis Blesen and an unnamed company appeared before him. They were acting as representatives with power of attorney from Samuel Bertieman, based on documents dated 6 September 1695 and confirmed on 3 October 1696 by Georghs Coluflin, Lolian Fhiomes Rauma, and Htans Jacob Kabis. The power of attorney had been registered on 19 December 1696. The representatives declared they had sold and transferred to Jacob Graaflandt two bonds that were held in the name of the former emperor's authority. These bonds had been received by Cornelis de Langh van Ellemeet in The Hague regarding the trade in quicksilver (mercury), dated 25 August and 1 September 1691. One bond was worth 4,000 guilders (number 500) and the other 2,000 guilders (number 12). The representatives handed over both bonds to the buyer and confirmed that the full amount, including both capital and interest, had been paid. They gave the buyer full ownership and the right to collect any remaining interest. They promised to protect the buyer from any legal claims and waived all their own rights to the bonds. The transaction was witnessed by Ab Leewen and Adrian van Loon.
On 24 April 1692, Dirck van der Groe recorded an agreement involving Jan Teunemans Junior and Elisabeth Climpers, widow of Dirck Teunemans. Jan Teunemans Junior acted as guardian where necessary. Jan and Dirck Teunemans were the children of Jan Teunemans the Elder. They agreed that their father and father-in-law, Jan Teunemans the Elder, could leave his current wife, Maria Jans van Dotmaessen, certain property if he died before her. This included, beyond her regular child's portion according to local law, a sum of 630 guilders in cash, a thick gold chain she wore around her neck, 2 diamond bows she wore as earrings, a gold diamond ring, 3 gold small rings, and silver items she possessed. These items together were valued at 700 guilders, bringing the total to 1,330 guilders. In return, the children promised not to challenge this arrangement after their father's death. However, there was a condition: if Maria Jans van Dotmaessen died without children or descendants from her current marriage or any future marriage, everything except 600 guilders would return to the family line of Jan Teunemans the Elder. Maria Jans could freely dispose of the 600 guilders. If she outlived her husband, she could use all the inherited property during her lifetime, even spend it all, but could only leave 600 guilders by will. No security needed to be provided for this arrangement, as long as her own estate would remain bound to this restitution obligation. The agreement was witnessed by Abraham Leewen and Adrian van Loon, and signed by Joan Teunemans Junior, Elisabeth Climpers, and others.
On 24 April 1698, Hendrick Vesseker and his wife Elre Lagemans appeared before notary Dirck van der Groe. Elre Lagemans was assisted by her husband, who authorized her participation. They both acknowledged they owed Pieter Vergouw a sum of 1,000
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 606955 / 217 Maria Lagemans, widow of Gilles Verkruijssen, living in Amsterdam in the Vijzelstraat near the church street by the Vijzelstraat, appeared on 18 December 1693 before notary Wilhelmus Sijlvius. She declared that she appointed and authorized the honorable Jan Bartelsz Heuckelman to do the following things for her:
He was given the power to appoint a substitute. She promised to always approve everything done under this authorization, with legal obligations and the requirement to provide accounting and proof. The witnesses were Willem Egbrinchof and Abraham Hoetmaer.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320208 / 254
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2361783 / 52
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320228 / 222 Maria Lagemansdochter made a will with specific instructions about her estate. She stated that if her brother Willem Lagemans died without legitimate children either before or after her daughter's death, then his share should go to her daughter Elsje. If that was not possible, the inheritance should pass to the children of her sister Elsje Lagemans and Sybrand Lagemans, or their descendants if they had died. Her brothers Jan and Willem were not allowed to give away their portions during their lifetime or in a will, and those portions could not pass to other heirs. However, her brothers Jan and Willem were permitted to manage and use their portions as they wished, make profits from them, and handle them without having to provide security for any losses, as long as the inheritance eventually went to the designated heirs.
The testator appointed executors and guardians for her young daughter. She chose her brother Jan Lagemont and Hendrick Voet (a cloth dyer) as executors and guardians. She gave them full power and authority to act as executors, guardians, and administrators. If one of them could not serve, the other could choose her brother-in-law Hendrik Visscher or another suitable male person from her family or blood relatives to replace him with equal powers. This arrangement would continue until the guardianship ended.
The testator specifically excluded the orphan masters and all other authorities from having any say in these matters. She wanted her jewelry, gold and silver items, and her best cabinet and linens to be kept by her sister Elsje Lagemans for her daughter until the daughter came of age, without Elsje having to provide security. The testator also arranged for her daughter to be raised by Elsje Lagemans until the age of 18, with the guardians agreeing on the costs.
The testator declared this to be her last will and testament and wanted it to be fully followed, whether as a will, codicil, or in any other valid legal form. This will was drawn up in Amsterdam at the testator's residence in the presence of witnesses Willem van Bijck and Jan Pieter van de Linde, who confirmed they knew the testator and that she was the person she claimed to be. The document was signed by Maria Lagemans, Willem van Dijck, and notary Sylvius.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320228 / 52 12 September 1693, Saturday morning around half past 10, Maria Lagemans appeared before the notary. She was the former widow of Christiaen Baras and most recently of Gilles Verbruijssen. She lived in the Kerkstraat, between the Vieelstraat and Spiegelstraat. She was sick and lying in bed, but her mind, memory and speech were still working well.
Because life is short, death is certain, and the hour of death is uncertain, she made her will of her own free choice and with careful thought.
First, she placed her soul in God's mercy and wanted her dead body to be buried properly. She hoped to be resurrected on the Day of Judgment.
Second, she cancelled all previous wills and other documents about what should happen after her death.
She left the following things:
However, there was one important condition: if Christina Baras died unmarried before she turned 25 years old, then everything she inherited from her mother (except the legal portions that she could keep) had to go to Barent, Hendrik, Jan, Willem and Elsie Lageman.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320228 / 75
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 606893 / 8 Jacob Mars and Susanna de Hulter made arrangements in their will. If the husband died first without legitimate children, the wife had to pay his father his lawful share from the inheritance. The husband made his father a co-heir for this portion only. If the husband died first without legitimate children, his father (or if he was dead, the husband's brothers) would receive as a gift the husband's clothes made of silk, linen, wool and other fabrics. The father would get this in addition to his lawful share. If the wife died first without legitimate children, the husband had to give her sisters as a gift her clothes of silk, linen, wool and other items belonging to her.
The testators declared this to be their will and wanted it to be fully followed, either as a testament or as a codicil or gift or in whatever way it could best be valid. This happened in Amsterdam at the office of notary W. Silvius. Willem Egbrinchof and Jacob Beverlander were present as witnesses.
On Saturday, September 12, 1693, in the morning around half past 10, Maria Lagemans appeared before notary Wilhelmus Silvius. She was the widow first of Christiaen Baras and later of Gilles Verkuijffen. She lived in the church street between the fifth and mirror streets. She was sick in bed but had full use of her mind, memory and speech.
Because she thought about how fragile life is and how death is certain but its timing uncertain, she made her will. She entrusted her soul to God's mercy and wanted her body to have a proper burial, hoping for resurrection on judgment day.
Maria Lagemans cancelled all previous wills and codicils. She gave her silk dress to her sister Elie Lagemans as a gift. She made her only child, her daughter Christina Baras, her sole heir (or if the daughter died first, her legitimate descendants). However, there was an important condition: if Christina Baras died unmarried before age 25, everything she inherited from her mother (except for the lawful portions she was allowed to keep) had to go to:
If any of these substitute heirs died first, their legitimate descendants would take their place. The daughter Christina Baras was not allowed to give away or dispose of her mother's inheritance in any other way. If the testator's brother Jan Lagemans died after the testator but before or after the testator's daughter, without leaving legitimate children, then his one seventh share would go elsewhere.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320260 / 236 Femmetie Lagemans' brother Willem Lageman was mentioned. If he died without legitimate children before or after the person making the will, his one-seventh share would go to the will-maker's sister Elsie Lagemans, and if she was not available, to the legitimate descendants of the will-maker's sister Else Lageman through representation. The brothers Jan and Willem were forbidden from disposing of their shares while alive or having them pass through inheritance laws. However, these brothers could manage and control their shares, make profits from them as they wished, and did not need to provide guarantees or security for any reduction in value.
The will-maker appointed executors for the will, guardians for her daughter and underage substitute heirs, and administrators of their property. She chose her brother Jan Lagemans and Hendrik Voet, an upholsterer, granting them full power and authority as executors, guardians and administrators. If one of them died, the other could continue alone or appoint another suitable man with equal power. This arrangement would continue until the end of the guardianship. The honorable orphan masters of this and other cities were expressly excluded from any authority.
The will-maker wanted her jewels, gold and silver objects, and her best cupboard and linens to be kept unsold by Voet for her daughter until she came of age. Voet did not need to provide security for this. Her daughter Gratias was to be placed in care by Voet until she reached 10 years old, for a sum to be agreed upon with the guardians.
The person making the will declared this to be her last will and testament and requested it be fully followed, either as written or as a gift, whichever way it could best be upheld. She asked the notary to record this and provide one or more proper testament documents.
This took place in Amsterdam at the home of the person making the will, with Willem Egbrinchof and Abraham Hoetmaer, residents of the city, as witnesses. They signed along with Man Lagemans, Winde Banchof, A. Houtman, and notary W. Silvius.
On Wednesday September 16, 1693, around half past 9 in the morning, Aernout Freres, a merchant living on Sint Annestraat in this city, appeared before notary Wilhelmus Silvius. Though physically ill but able to walk and stand, and in full possession of his mental faculties, memory and speech, he declared of his own free will that he wished to leave a special bequest from his property to Hendrik Frenaij, his son by his late wife Anneke Knoeff.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320260 / 237
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320260 / 223
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320228 / 51 Adriaen van Loon and Sand Rompt were present as witnesses. Hendrik Visser placed his mark, appointed by the aldermen mentioned before. Ad Poommuor and A. Bonk were also involved. D van der groe, notary, confirmed this upon request.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 606893 / 9
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320228 / 76 Barent Penge's children and Femmetie Lagemans' 3 children would receive the last and 7th part. If one or more of the substitute heirs died before the testatrix, their legitimate children would take their place. The testatrix's daughter was forbidden to dispose of the inheritance during her lifetime or after death, and the inheritance could not pass to other heirs outside these rules.
If the testatrix's brother Jan Lagemans died before or after the testatrix's daughter without leaving legitimate children, his 7th part would go entirely to the 3 children of Femmetie Lageman or their legitimate descendants if any had already died.
If her brother Willem Lageman died without legitimate children before or after the testatrix's daughter, his 7th part would go to the testatrix's sister Eli Lagemans, and if she was deceased, to the legitimate descendants of the testatrix's sister Elsie Lagemans through representation. The brothers Jan and Willem were forbidden to dispose of their portions contrary to these rules during their lifetime or after death.
However, the brothers Jan and Willem Lagemans were allowed to control and manage their portions, do business with them, and make profit as they wished without providing guarantees or security for any decrease in value, provided that in the event mentioned above, whatever they would have inherited from the testatrix would have to come from their estates.
The testatrix appointed as executors of her will, guardians over her daughter and minor substitute heirs, and administrators of their property: her brother Jan Lagemans and Hendik Voet, a hat furnisher. She gave them full power and authority as could be given to executors, guardians and administrators. She also gave them the power that if one of them could not serve, the other could appoint the testatrix's brother-in-law Hendrik Wissel, or failing him, another suitable man with the approval of the testatrix's closest blood relatives, with equal power to replace the one who could not serve. This arrangement would continue until the end of the guardianship.
In all cases, the city orphan masters and all others who might claim authority were expressly excluded. She thanked the appointees for the effort they would take.
Furthermore, it was the testatrix's last will that her jewels, silver items, and her best cabinet and linens would be kept unsold for her daughter until she came of age by her sister Elsie Lagemans, without that sister being required to provide security.
The testatrix's daughter would be boarded with the testatrix's sister Elsie Lagemans until the age of 10 for such sum as she would agree upon with the guardians.
The testatrix declared everything stated above to be her testament, final and last will. She desired that it would be followed and obeyed as such, or if not, at least as a codicil or gift.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320260 / 224
View transcript NL-HlmNHA / 5307680 / 298 Pieter Groeneveld, Exerhardus Laubser, Souwrens Cornelisz van den Lijtsendam, Cornelis Stevensz Botma and his wife Jannetje Gerrits, Jacob Kloeten and his wife Eeusebia Overneij, Henning Husing and his wife Maria Lindenhof, Valenteijn Cleenveld and his wife Judith Kling, Klaas Laubser and his wife Engela Quint, Guilliam Heems and his wife Anna van Banchem, Harmanus van Brakel and Leendert van Brakel in partnership, Fredrik Vander Linde, Bezatrix Weijman, Michiel Leij and his wife Engeltje Breda, Gijsbert Olivier, Jacobus Louw and his wife Maria van Brakel, Hendrik Donker and his wife Margareta Hendrina van Otteren, Gerrit Jansz Visser and his wife Jannetje Sielemans, Frans Mauke, Steven Vermeij and his wife Aletta van Es, Joost Schink and his wife Sara Botma, Darius Jansz van Coetchin, Sacharija Janse Visser, Gerbreg Verdenus widow of Mensing, Minne Goosens, Willem Mensing, Lambert Theunisz, Jan Hendrik Stijger, Daniel Rodrigos, Bejatrix Olivier, Gijsbert Verschuer, Gerrit Hendriksz Maijer and his wife Susanna Kostouw, and Dirk Verweij and his wife Geesje Visser were listed with various numerical entries including amounts in guilders and counts of people, livestock, and agricultural products.
Nicolaas Oortmans and his wife Johanna Roosendaal, Theunis Dirksz van Schalkwijk, and Jan Laubser were also recorded with similar information.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 4052 / 0438 Find your ancestors and publish your family tree on Genealogy Online via https://www.genealogieonline.nl/en/