Users of Open Archives can have a summary made of the transcriptions created using handwriting recognition.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient to make the historical document understandable. In the transcripts, names are underlined in green and clickable (to search the personal entries on Open Archives for the name in question), the recognized dates have a light gray background and recognized place names have a light purple background.
11 February 1780
In
Haarlem,
Cornelis van Drosthagen and his wife
Anna Magdalena Wessels appeared before notary
Julius Hendrik Fribiehen.
Anna Magdalena Wessels was assisted by her husband, who gave her special permission to sign this document.
They declared that they had sold a small lottery bond to
Jan Koning, a merchant from
Amsterdam. The bond had the following details:
- Issued by the United Netherlands at the General Office of the Union in The Hague
- Part of a lottery for half of 6,000,000 guilders, increased by another 3,000,000 guilders
- Letter designation: F. R. S.
- Capital value: 400 guilders
- Dated 1 January 1713
- Number: 351
- Registered on folio 188 verso
- Approved on 10 November 1713, registered on folio 1258 verso
The sellers had received this bond through an official transfer document dated
6 May 1774, passed before notary
Jacob Elout in
Haarlem, from
Isaak van der Vinne and
Jan van Walré.
The sellers confirmed they had been fully paid for the bond, including both the capital and any interest that was due. They gave
Jan Koning full ownership rights and promised to protect him against any future claims on the bond. They bound themselves and their possessions to this agreement according to law.
Witnesses were
Albertus Prince and
Claas Westerhout.
View transcript NL-HlmNHA / 4974566 / 101
- On 20 December (year not stated), a legal document was drawn up before notary Julius Hendrik Froichen in Haarlem.
- Egbert Agterhier, living in Haarlem, appeared as the special representative of Kaatje van Drosthag, who was the wife of Mr. Jan Boeve.
- His authority came from a power of attorney document dated 21 June 1783, which was prepared by Z. W. Hartman, who was the mayor of the lordship of Zalk and Vekaten and notary there.
- Egbert Agterhier, acting as representative, declared that he had sold and transferred a bond to the noblewoman Petronella Maria Heshuysen.
- The bond was issued by the Province of Holland and West Friesland, registered at the office in Haarlem.
- The bond was blank, worth 290 guilders in capital, dated 1 October 1687, numbered 1 D. 210 No. 1, and approved on 5 March 1688, number 1773.
- The bond had been transferred to Kaatje van Drosthagen by Albertus Rennenbergh through a private transfer document dated 25 March 1774.
- The representative confirmed that the buyer, the noblewoman Petronella Maria Heshuysen, had fully paid the purchase price, including both the capital and all interest that was due.
- He therefore gave her full receipt and transferred to her all rights, claims, and ownership that his principal Kaatje van Drosthagen had held up to that date.
- He promised to protect and guarantee the bond against all claims forever and against everyone, binding the persons and goods of Jan Boeve and Kaatje van Drosthagen as married couple for this purpose.
- The document was signed in Haarlem in the presence of witnesses Pieter van Lee and Daniel van (surname incomplete).
View transcript NL-HlmNHA / 4974573 / 667
On 27 December 1934, two marriages took place in Amsterdam before a civil registrar.
The first marriage was between Jacques Antonius Baartmans, a 64-year-old school principal born in Nijmegen and living in Maarheeze, and Clara Louise Constance Bunnemeijer, a 49-year-old woman without a profession who was born and living in Amsterdam. Jacques Antonius Baartmans was a widower whose late wife was Maria Johanna van den Borne. His parents, Johannes Jacobus Baartmans and Johanna ten Ham, were both deceased. Clara Louise Constance Bunnemeijer was the daughter of Hermann Friedrich Carl Bunnemeijer, who was deceased, and Maria Augusta Fredrica Lambertina Hake Wessell, who had no profession and lived in Amsterdam. The marriage announcement had been posted without objection in Amsterdam and Haarheeze on 15 December. The bride and groom declared they accepted each other as spouses and would faithfully fulfill all duties required by law. The registrar then declared them married by law. The witnesses were:
The second marriage was between Antonius Arends, a 27-year-old office worker born and living in Amsterdam, and Frida Karle, a 25-year-old German woman without a profession who was born in Böckingen in Germany and living in Amsterdam. Antonius Arends was the son of Antonius Arends, a 52-year-old watchman, and Johanna Geertruida Lassing, a 49-year-old woman without a profession, both living in Amsterdam. Frida Karle was the daughter of Wilhelm Karle, a bricklayer, and Anna Schmitt, without a profession, both living in Böckingen in Germany. The groom's parents gave their permission for the marriage. The marriage announcement had been posted without objection in Amsterdam on 15 December. The bride and groom declared they accepted each other as spouses and would faithfully fulfill all duties required by law. The registrar then declared them married by law. The witnesses were:
Both witnesses lived in Amsterdam.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 1930961 / 61
Thomas van der Velde, a shipwright at the East India Company shipyard, and his wife Elisabeth Veltman, living on Wittenburg in the small street in Amsterdam, appeared before notary Johannes Boots on April 2, 1723 in the evening at 6 o'clock. They were both healthy in body and mind. Thinking about the fragility of life and the certainty of death, they made their last will and testament. They cancelled all previous wills they had made. Out of marital love and affection for each other, they appointed each other as the sole and universal heir to all their possessions, including movable and immovable property, shares, credits, and rights, with no exceptions, that the first one to die would leave behind.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320271 / 161
- The longest-living spouse would inherit everything the first spouse left behind, wherever it was located or would be found.
- The longest-living spouse could keep everything and do with it whatever they wanted without having to give anyone an accounting or inventory or pay out anything.
- This applied whether the first dying spouse had children or descendants or not.
- If there were children, the longest-living spouse had to raise them properly according to their status and circumstances, have them educated in whatever profession they were best suited for, and either marry them off or provide them with a dowry when they came of age, as the longest-living spouse saw fit.
- If the longest-living spouse remarried, they had to provide proof to the children regarding the father's or mother's goods in whatever amount the longest-living spouse in good conscience thought appropriate.
- This proof had to be written and given to such persons as the longest-living spouse wanted to request for this purpose.
- The testators appointed their child or children as co-heir or co-heirs in this raising, providing, and giving of proof, in payment of their father's or mother's goods or at least of their legitimate portion.
- The longest-living spouse would in all cases, even when remarrying, remain in possession of the children's proven goods without having to provide any guarantee or security, even if this was required by law or practice, as long as a proper deed was made in case of proof when remarrying or beforehand.
- They appointed each other as sole and absolute guardian over their minor child or children and as administrator of their goods, with power to do so in case of proof as well as at the final death or also during the life of the last dying spouse if they thought it good.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320271 / 162
Willem Veltman, who worked as a ship's carpenter at the East India Company shipyard and lived in
Witte Straat, was named in this will. If his daughter (the testatrix, or female will-maker) died first without leaving any descendants, and
Willem Veltman was still alive at that time, then the testator (male will-maker) had to pay
Willem Veltman his legal share of the inheritance called the legitime portie. The testatrix made her father
Willem Veltman a co-heir for only this legitime portie and nothing more.
Both will-makers declared this to be their mutual last will and testament, which they wanted to be upheld either as a will or as a codicil (an addition to a will) or as a gift in case of death, whichever legal form would be most valid.
The document was made and passed in
Amsterdam at the notary's house located at
Oude Schans near
Korte Koningstraat. The witnesses present were
Barent Franse and
Gerrit Janse. The document was signed by
Elisabeth Veltman, the notary named
Boots,
Barent Franse, and
Gerrit Janse.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320271 / 163
On 11 November 1795, a report was read at the meeting from the Commission of Administration of French troops in the Republic of the United Netherlands. The commission stated that, following a resolution from 6 November, they had obtained a free passport for skipper Willem Veltman, who was loaded with provisions, supplies, medicine, and other items. However, the committee found that instead of the 50 barrels of flour mentioned in the passport, the skipper was actually carrying (in addition to the other goods mentioned in the report) 415 barrels of flour. The committee therefore requested that the authorities make the necessary changes to the resolution and passport that were attached to their report, and issue them in corrected form.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.01.02 / 1730 / 0937
The ship Ternesse sailed for
Amsterdam with 70 guilders. The crew consisted of:
- Gerrit Stocke from Veere, Captain, 1716, 48 years old
- Abraham Uijthoff from Amsterdam, First Mate, 1718, 32 years old
- Elias Moenix from Middelburg, Second Mate, 1717, 26 years old
- Jurriaan Hendriksz, Third Watch, 1716
Surgeons:
Carpenters:
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1902 / 0489
Pieter and Katrijna Ramak made their will. Due to weakness, Pieter could not sign his name and used a mark instead. They declared that this was their testament and last will, and they wanted it to be followed after their death. They stated that the will should have full legal effect, even if not all legal formalities required by law were properly observed.
The will was made in the presence of Cornelis Gistius and Willem Veltman, who were asked to serve as witnesses. The notary confirmed the document.
View transcript NL-HlmNHA / 5843012 / 365
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320373 / 297
30 September 1645,
Jannetje Verbeek appeared before notary
Wilhelmus Silvius. She was the widow of
Claes van Houten and his heir according to a will dated
21 August 1684 made before notary
Jacob van Hellerus. She lived in the city and was assisted by
Dirck Luijk, her son-in-law, who acted as her chosen guardian. She gave power to
Gerrit van Houten, who was a water board official of the
Eendragtspolder or
Groothuis Beijerland, to legally transfer 17 morgen and 203 rods of tithe-free land located in the
Eendragtspolder to
Gabriel Jannes. The sale price was 6,000 guilders at 85 stuivers and 714 penningen per morgen. She acknowledged receiving 2,000 guilders and would provide security for the remaining 4,000 guilders according to the sale contract passed before the notary on that same day. Witnesses were
Pieter Purmerent and
Wen Egbringhof.
1 October 1695,
Jan Lageman appeared before notary
Wilhelmus Silvius. He lived in the
Roseboomsteeg and was sick in bed but still of sound mind. He explained that he had been appointed as guardian, replacing
Jan Gilles, over the orphaned child of his deceased sister
Maria Lagemans, who had been the widow of
Christiaan d'Arras and later of
Gillis Kruijs, who was the executor of her will. Because he wanted to ensure a capable and honest man from the family would succeed him as guardian and executor, he requested and authorized his brother-in-law
Hendrik Visscher for this position, asking the aldermen to approve him and requesting an official record of this.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320284 / 359
- 4 October 1695: Jurriaan Jurriaens van Calman (28 years old, cook), Teunis Pietersz van Cooperwijk (46 years old), Johan Luningh from Breme (51 years old), and Christiaan Louwerentsz van Tondere from Golstein (20 years old) appeared before notary Simon van Sevenhoven in Amsterdam. They were all sailors who had recently served on the ship called the Weapon of Stattijn.
- The sailors testified at the request of skipper Hendrik Albreght van Stattijn. They declared that in the previous year they had been hired by the skipper to sail to Ceral in the Baltic Sea and back.
- Before leaving, they received half a month's wages in advance from the skipper here in Amsterdam.
- When the ship arrived in the Sont (the Sound), 3 people ran away without the skipper's knowledge, arranged by the helmsman Daniel Croes. These 3 were: Erasmus Pietersz (chief boatswain), Roeloff Govertsz from Norway, and Roeloff Brassmus from Norway (both sailors).
- The sailors testified that helmsman Daniel Croes was not capable of steering the ship through the sea, because he had no knowledge of the waters and cities in the Baltic Sea.
- During the voyage, the helmsman nearly ran the ship aground in daylight due to his incompetence. Only because the skipper came up and instructed him was disaster prevented.
- Eventually the sailors arrived with the ship in Revall, where the helmsman got so drunk that he fell asleep.
- The witnesses at this testimony were Johannes de Geest and Jak Mulder.
- Another matter mentioned: Dirk Geus, Pieter Mol, and Risje Geus appeared regarding Claas van's testament, which mentioned Maria and Willemijna Jens.
- 4 October 1695 (at 12 o'clock): Nicolaus Mes, a doctor living in Amsterdam, appeared before notary Simon van Sevenhoven.
- Nicolaus Mes declared that Maria Lagemans, widow of Christiaan d'Arras and last widow and estate administrator of Gilles Verkrius, had made a guardianship testament on 11 December 1696 before notary Franco.
- In that testament, Maria Lagemans appointed her daughter Christina d'Arras as her sole heir, and appointed Jan Pilles and Nicolaus Mes himself as guardians over her, administrators of her property, and executors of her testament.
- The testament gave them special power to appoint a replacement guardian if one of them was legally prevented from serving or died.
- After Maria Lagemans died, Joan Gilles appointed Jan Lageman in his place, subject to approval by the city magistrates of Amsterdam. Joan Gilles was then released from his guardianship.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 1510898 / 91
On 24 April 1690, Dirck van der Groe, a notary, recorded that Cornelis Blesen and an unnamed company appeared before him. They were acting as representatives with power of attorney from Samuel Bertieman, based on documents dated 6 September 1695 and confirmed on 3 October 1696 by Georghs Coluflin, Lolian Fhiomes Rauma, and Htans Jacob Kabis. The power of attorney had been registered on 19 December 1696. The representatives declared they had sold and transferred to Jacob Graaflandt two bonds that were held in the name of the former emperor's authority. These bonds had been received by Cornelis de Langh van Ellemeet in The Hague regarding the trade in quicksilver (mercury), dated 25 August and 1 September 1691. One bond was worth 4,000 guilders (number 500) and the other 2,000 guilders (number 12). The representatives handed over both bonds to the buyer and confirmed that the full amount, including both capital and interest, had been paid. They gave the buyer full ownership and the right to collect any remaining interest. They promised to protect the buyer from any legal claims and waived all their own rights to the bonds. The transaction was witnessed by Ab Leewen and Adrian van Loon.
On 24 April 1692, Dirck van der Groe recorded an agreement involving Jan Teunemans Junior and Elisabeth Climpers, widow of Dirck Teunemans. Jan Teunemans Junior acted as guardian where necessary. Jan and Dirck Teunemans were the children of Jan Teunemans the Elder. They agreed that their father and father-in-law, Jan Teunemans the Elder, could leave his current wife, Maria Jans van Dotmaessen, certain property if he died before her. This included, beyond her regular child's portion according to local law, a sum of 630 guilders in cash, a thick gold chain she wore around her neck, 2 diamond bows she wore as earrings, a gold diamond ring, 3 gold small rings, and silver items she possessed. These items together were valued at 700 guilders, bringing the total to 1,330 guilders. In return, the children promised not to challenge this arrangement after their father's death. However, there was a condition: if Maria Jans van Dotmaessen died without children or descendants from her current marriage or any future marriage, everything except 600 guilders would return to the family line of Jan Teunemans the Elder. Maria Jans could freely dispose of the 600 guilders. If she outlived her husband, she could use all the inherited property during her lifetime, even spend it all, but could only leave 600 guilders by will. No security needed to be provided for this arrangement, as long as her own estate would remain bound to this restitution obligation. The agreement was witnessed by Abraham Leewen and Adrian van Loon, and signed by Joan Teunemans Junior, Elisabeth Climpers, and others.
On 24 April 1698, Hendrick Vesseker and his wife Elre Lagemans appeared before notary Dirck van der Groe. Elre Lagemans was assisted by her husband, who authorized her participation. They both acknowledged they owed Pieter Vergouw a sum of 1,000
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 606955 / 217
Maria Lagemans, widow of Gilles Verkruijssen, living in Amsterdam in the Vijzelstraat near the church street by the Vijzelstraat, appeared on 18 December 1693 before notary Wilhelmus Sijlvius. She declared that she appointed and authorized the honorable Jan Bartelsz Heuckelman to do the following things for her:
- Collect outstanding debts and rents using the documents given to him
- Give receipts for each payment received
- Provide security for warnings
- Rent out, manage, and have her real estate repaired
- Settle accounts with everyone
- If debtors were unwilling to pay, use legal means both as plaintiff and defendant
- Appear before all courts where required
- Pursue her rights and legal claims against anyone
- Continue legal cases until final judgment and complete execution
- Collect money from seized, deposited, and sold goods under proper security
- Do everything else she herself could do if she were present
He was given the power to appoint a substitute. She promised to always approve everything done under this authorization, with legal obligations and the requirement to provide accounting and proof. The witnesses were Willem Egbrinchof and Abraham Hoetmaer.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320208 / 254
The estate would be transferred to
Willem Arices' heirs 6 weeks after her death, without deducting any Trebellian portion, free from any burdens and debts. The houses would be handed over in the same condition as they were found at the time of her death. The testator declared this to be her final and voluntary last will. She wanted it to take full effect after her death, either as a testament or, if that was not possible, as a codicil, a gift made during life for cause of death, or in whatever way a last will could legally be valid. This was the case even if some legal formalities required by law were not fully observed. She asked the notary to record this and provide her with a formal document.
This was done in
Amsterdam in the presence of
Gysbert Kijs and
Hendriense Lakemans, who were called as witnesses on
the 2nd. Also present were
Maria Mare Brijsbert Aris,
Hendrick Hendrick Lagemans, and others.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2361783 / 52
1382 was a significant year for recording wills and estate inventories in a Dutch community.
The following legal documents were registered:
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320228 / 222
Maria Lagemansdochter made a will with specific instructions about her estate. She stated that if her brother Willem Lagemans died without legitimate children either before or after her daughter's death, then his share should go to her daughter Elsje. If that was not possible, the inheritance should pass to the children of her sister Elsje Lagemans and Sybrand Lagemans, or their descendants if they had died. Her brothers Jan and Willem were not allowed to give away their portions during their lifetime or in a will, and those portions could not pass to other heirs. However, her brothers Jan and Willem were permitted to manage and use their portions as they wished, make profits from them, and handle them without having to provide security for any losses, as long as the inheritance eventually went to the designated heirs.
The testator appointed executors and guardians for her young daughter. She chose her brother Jan Lagemont and Hendrick Voet (a cloth dyer) as executors and guardians. She gave them full power and authority to act as executors, guardians, and administrators. If one of them could not serve, the other could choose her brother-in-law Hendrik Visscher or another suitable male person from her family or blood relatives to replace him with equal powers. This arrangement would continue until the guardianship ended.
The testator specifically excluded the orphan masters and all other authorities from having any say in these matters. She wanted her jewelry, gold and silver items, and her best cabinet and linens to be kept by her sister Elsje Lagemans for her daughter until the daughter came of age, without Elsje having to provide security. The testator also arranged for her daughter to be raised by Elsje Lagemans until the age of 18, with the guardians agreeing on the costs.
The testator declared this to be her last will and testament and wanted it to be fully followed, whether as a will, codicil, or in any other valid legal form. This will was drawn up in Amsterdam at the testator's residence in the presence of witnesses Willem van Bijck and Jan Pieter van de Linde, who confirmed they knew the testator and that she was the person she claimed to be. The document was signed by Maria Lagemans, Willem van Dijck, and notary Sylvius.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320228 / 52
12 September 1693, Saturday morning around half past 10, Maria Lagemans appeared before the notary. She was the former widow of Christiaen Baras and most recently of Gilles Verbruijssen. She lived in the Kerkstraat, between the Vieelstraat and Spiegelstraat. She was sick and lying in bed, but her mind, memory and speech were still working well.
Because life is short, death is certain, and the hour of death is uncertain, she made her will of her own free choice and with careful thought.
First, she placed her soul in God's mercy and wanted her dead body to be buried properly. She hoped to be resurrected on the Day of Judgment.
Second, she cancelled all previous wills and other documents about what should happen after her death.
She left the following things:
- To her sister Elsie Lagemans: her wool coat and cap
- To her only child and daughter Christina Baras (or if she died first, to her legitimate descendants): all her other possessions and property wherever they were located
However, there was one important condition: if Christina Baras died unmarried before she turned 25 years old, then everything she inherited from her mother (except the legal portions that she could keep) had to go to Barent, Hendrik, Jan, Willem and Elsie Lageman.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320228 / 75
24 April 1690
On this date,
Hendrick Visser and
Else Lagemans, a married couple living in the city, appeared before notary
Dirck van der Groe with witnesses present.
Else Lagemans was assisted by her husband, who authorized her to proceed with this legal document.
The couple acknowledged together and individually that they owed
Pieter Vergouw the sum of 1,000 Carolus guilders (at 20 stuivers each). This debt resulted from money that had been properly lent and provided to them by
Vergouw, which they confirmed they had received and enjoyed to their complete satisfaction and contentment.
Visser and
Lagemans promised the following:
- To repay the capital sum of 1,000 guilders in ready money to Vergouw within 6 months from this date
- To pay interest at a rate of 4 percent per year, starting from this date and continuing until the full payment and settlement of the capital sum was completed
- To pledge their persons and property as security for fulfilling this obligation
Else Lagemans specifically renounced several legal protections that normally would have prevented a woman from being liable for debts or acting as guarantor, including protections under city law that prohibited women from standing surety for others, even for their own husbands.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 606893 / 8
Jacob Mars and Susanna de Hulter made arrangements in their will. If the husband died first without legitimate children, the wife had to pay his father his lawful share from the inheritance. The husband made his father a co-heir for this portion only. If the husband died first without legitimate children, his father (or if he was dead, the husband's brothers) would receive as a gift the husband's clothes made of silk, linen, wool and other fabrics. The father would get this in addition to his lawful share. If the wife died first without legitimate children, the husband had to give her sisters as a gift her clothes of silk, linen, wool and other items belonging to her.
The testators declared this to be their will and wanted it to be fully followed, either as a testament or as a codicil or gift or in whatever way it could best be valid. This happened in Amsterdam at the office of notary W. Silvius. Willem Egbrinchof and Jacob Beverlander were present as witnesses.
On Saturday, September 12, 1693, in the morning around half past 10, Maria Lagemans appeared before notary Wilhelmus Silvius. She was the widow first of Christiaen Baras and later of Gilles Verkuijffen. She lived in the church street between the fifth and mirror streets. She was sick in bed but had full use of her mind, memory and speech.
Because she thought about how fragile life is and how death is certain but its timing uncertain, she made her will. She entrusted her soul to God's mercy and wanted her body to have a proper burial, hoping for resurrection on judgment day.
Maria Lagemans cancelled all previous wills and codicils. She gave her silk dress to her sister Elie Lagemans as a gift. She made her only child, her daughter Christina Baras, her sole heir (or if the daughter died first, her legitimate descendants). However, there was an important condition: if Christina Baras died unmarried before age 25, everything she inherited from her mother (except for the lawful portions she was allowed to keep) had to go to:
If any of these substitute heirs died first, their legitimate descendants would take their place. The daughter Christina Baras was not allowed to give away or dispose of her mother's inheritance in any other way. If the testator's brother Jan Lagemans died after the testator but before or after the testator's daughter, without leaving legitimate children, then his one seventh share would go elsewhere.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320260 / 236
Femmetie Lagemans' brother Willem Lageman was mentioned. If he died without legitimate children before or after the person making the will, his one-seventh share would go to the will-maker's sister Elsie Lagemans, and if she was not available, to the legitimate descendants of the will-maker's sister Else Lageman through representation. The brothers Jan and Willem were forbidden from disposing of their shares while alive or having them pass through inheritance laws. However, these brothers could manage and control their shares, make profits from them as they wished, and did not need to provide guarantees or security for any reduction in value.
The will-maker appointed executors for the will, guardians for her daughter and underage substitute heirs, and administrators of their property. She chose her brother Jan Lagemans and Hendrik Voet, an upholsterer, granting them full power and authority as executors, guardians and administrators. If one of them died, the other could continue alone or appoint another suitable man with equal power. This arrangement would continue until the end of the guardianship. The honorable orphan masters of this and other cities were expressly excluded from any authority.
The will-maker wanted her jewels, gold and silver objects, and her best cupboard and linens to be kept unsold by Voet for her daughter until she came of age. Voet did not need to provide security for this. Her daughter Gratias was to be placed in care by Voet until she reached 10 years old, for a sum to be agreed upon with the guardians.
The person making the will declared this to be her last will and testament and requested it be fully followed, either as written or as a gift, whichever way it could best be upheld. She asked the notary to record this and provide one or more proper testament documents.
This took place in Amsterdam at the home of the person making the will, with Willem Egbrinchof and Abraham Hoetmaer, residents of the city, as witnesses. They signed along with Man Lagemans, Winde Banchof, A. Houtman, and notary W. Silvius.
On Wednesday September 16, 1693, around half past 9 in the morning, Aernout Freres, a merchant living on Sint Annestraat in this city, appeared before notary Wilhelmus Silvius. Though physically ill but able to walk and stand, and in full possession of his mental faculties, memory and speech, he declared of his own free will that he wished to leave a special bequest from his property to Hendrik Frenaij, his son by his late wife Anneke Knoeff.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320260 / 237
- Debts of the deceased totaled 439 guilders and 50 stuivers and 8 penningen
- Additional expenses included: 20 guilders and 15 stuivers for coffins and carriers, 3 guilders for the grave, 31 guilders 1 stuiver and 8 penningen to the almoners, 2 guilders and 10 stuivers to the speaker and mourning goods
- 2 guilders and 14 stuivers to the baker, 14 guilders and 6 stuivers to the surgeon, 62 guilders and 13 stuivers for the coffin
- 20 guilders and 2 stuivers to the wine merchant, 11 guilders and 19 stuivers to the same person
- Payments to a doctor, for wax and household expenses (9 guilders and 10 stuivers), 58 guilders for rent, 15 guilders to the servant
- 36 guilders and 18 stuivers to Aeltie for service during the illness
- Various small amounts and 46 guilders 5 stuivers and 8 stuivers to the notary for requested and earned services
- The inventory was made by the notary on 20 February 1692 and following days, upon request
- The account keeper declared he had conducted himself properly and honestly in providing the information, without knowingly hiding anything
- He promised to add any additional items belonging to the estate that might come to his knowledge later, and to confirm the truthfulness under oath if necessary
- This was completed in Amsterdam and closed on 25 March 1693 in the presence of witnesses Rudolphus Jansonius and Willem Eybrinchoff
- The document was signed by Pieter Burgemeester, Rudolphus Jan Conijn, Willem Egbrinchof, and notary Mylius
- On 30 August 1693, a Sunday morning around 11 o'clock, Maria Lagemans appeared before notary Wilhelmus Silvius
- Maria Lagemans was the widow of Christiaen Baras and later of Gilles Verbruijs, living in the Kerkstraat between the Vijsel and Spiegelstraten
- She was lying in bed sick but had full mental capacity, memory and speech
- Considering the frailty of life, the certainty of death and the uncertain hour of death, she made her last will and testament of her own free will
- She commended her soul to God's mercy and requested an honorable burial, hoping for resurrection on the Last Day
- She revoked all previous testaments, codicils and other last will documents
- She left her black cloth robe to her sister Elsie Lagemans
- She appointed her only child and daughter Cristina Baras as her sole heir of all her remaining goods and possessions, wherever they might be located
- If Cristina Baras died her lawful descendants would inherit by representation
- However, there was a special condition: if Cristina Baras died unmarried before age 25, then everything she would inherit (except for the legitime and trebellianic portions which she kept) would go to others
- In that case, the inheritance would be divided among Barent, Hendrik, Jan, Willem and
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320260 / 223
- 30 August 1696, Sunday, around 11 o'clock in the morning, Maria Lagemans, widow of Christiaen Baras and later of Gilles Verkruyssen, appeared before notary Wilhielmus Silouis.
- She lived in the church street between the Vijfel and Spiegelstreets in italic (location implied but not explicitly named).
- She was sick in bed but had full mental capacity, memory, and speech.
- She made her will, thinking about the shortness of life, the certainty of death, and the uncertain hour of death.
- She entrusted her soul to God's mercy and requested a decent burial, hoping for resurrection on judgment day.
- She revoked all previous wills, gifts, and other documents of last will.
- She left all her property and possessions to her only child, Christina Baras, or if Christina died before her, to Christina's legal descendants by right of representation.
- However, there was a condition: if Christina Baras died unmarried before the age of 25, then everything Christina inherited (except the legal minimum portions) would go to Barent, Hendrick, Jan Willem, and Elsje Lagemans (her brother and sisters), each receiving 1/7th share.
- Another 1/7th share would go to Anna Judit, daughter of her deceased sister Agniet Lageman Bart.
- The last 1/7th share would go to Agnies, Maria, and Petgen, children of her sister Jennietje Lagemans, to be divided among the three of them.
- If any of these substitute heirs died before receiving their share, their legal descendants would take their place.
- Christina was forbidden from disposing of the inheritance differently during her lifetime or through her own will.
- If her brother Jan Lageman died before or after Maria without leaving legal children, his 1/7th share would go to the three children of Fennietje Lagemans, or their legal descendants if any had died.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320228 / 51
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 606893 / 9
- The woman making the will (the testatrix) left her estate to her daughter, with special rules about what would happen after the daughter's death.
- When the daughter died, the estate would be divided into 7 equal parts among: the testatrix's brothers and sister (each receiving one-seventh), Anna Indit (daughter of the testatrix's deceased sister Agniet Lagemans, receiving one-seventh), and Agnies, Maria, and Barent Penge (children of the testatrix's sister Femmetie Lagemans, sharing one-seventh among the three of them).
- If any of these substitute heirs died before receiving their share, their portion would go to their lawful descendants.
- The testatrix's daughter was not allowed to give away or otherwise dispose of the inheritance during her lifetime or in her own will.
- Special conditions were set for the testatrix's brother Jan Lagemans: if he died without lawful children (either before or after the testatrix and her daughter), his one-seventh share would go entirely to the 3 children of Femmetie Lagemans or their lawful descendants.
- Similar conditions applied to the testatrix's brother Willem Lagemans: if he died without lawful children, his one-seventh share would go to the testatrix's sister Elsie Lagemans or her lawful descendants.
- Jan and Willem Lagemans were not allowed to give away their portions during their lifetime or in their wills.
- However, the brothers Jan and Willem Lagemans were allowed to manage, control, and profit from their portions during their lifetimes without having to provide guarantees or security.
- The testatrix appointed as executors of her will, guardians over her daughter and underage substitute heirs, and administrators of their property: her brother Jan Lagemans and Hendrik Voet (a cattle dealer, her good acquaintance).
- These executors were given full power and authority, and if one could not serve, the other could act alone or appoint another suitable man (from family or otherwise) to assist or succeed him.
- The city orphan masters and any other authorities were explicitly excluded from having any say in the guardianship.
- The testatrix's jewelry, gold and silver items, and her best cabinet and linens were to be kept unsold by Voet for her daughter until the daughter reached adulthood, without Voet having to provide security for this responsibility.
- The testatrix's daughter was to be boarded with Voet until she reached the age of 10 years, for a sum to be agreed upon between Voet and the guardians.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 2320228 / 76
Previous pageNext page