Users of Open Archives can have a summary made of the transcriptions created using handwriting recognition.
Both artificial intelligence tasks are not perfect, but often more than sufficient to make the historical document understandable. In the transcripts, names are underlined in green and clickable (to search the personal entries on Open Archives for the name in question), the recognized dates have a light gray background and recognized place names have a light purple background.
Mr. Johan van Meeuwen appointed his uncle Ghysbert van Berlionne and others as legal representatives at the court of Utrecht. They were to arrange a property transfer, make declarations, and provide warranty guarantees according to legal requirements, with binding promises as required by law.
The person appearing stated he had received from his mother the sum of 30 guilders, which was his share (one quarter) of 120 guilders. This amount was left over from an account made by his uncle regarding interest payments on 600 guilders in capital. This capital had been lent by his uncle Mr. Anthonis van Melenwen, who was an organist in Embrik. The money had been secured on certain land in Cattenbroeck, which had recently been paid off by the landowner. He declared himself fully paid and satisfied regarding his portion of this interest payment. He released his mother and cousins and all others from any further claims.
Jannetgen van Manen appeared before the notary and accepted this arrangement, requesting a formal document, which was granted to her.
The document was drawn up in Utrecht at the notary's office on the 20th of this month, in the presence of witnesses Adam Peters van Halen and Claes Diovijs, both citizens of Utrecht. It was signed by Anthonis Christaensz van Meeuwen (the person appearing), Jannetgen van Manen, the notary Gerduijn, Adam Pietersoen van Lien, and Willem Nicolaes Dionys.
On a day in August in the year 1525, several people appeared before notary Nicolaes Verduim and witnesses. These were the honorable Adriana Mom, wife of Barnardus Bishoff, and Annaken Pieters, wife of Jois Plaman. Both men served as preachers of God's word in Utrecht.
These women declared under oath, at the request of Lieutenant Colonel Johan Regtthonne of Colonel Levingston's regiment, that the following was true: About 1.5 years earlier (they could not remember the exact date), on an afternoon, they had both gone together to the house of Johan van den Bongaerd, who lived at Riekerskerckhoff in Utrecht. They went to speak with a lady called Joffrouw van Blitterswijck, who was lying in childbed at that house at that time and had been in childbed for about 14 days.
While they were sitting and talking together, Joffrouw van Blitterswijck said that Monsieur Rosch, a lieutenant, was the father of her child. She said she had good hope that he would marry her, adding that his mother or grandmother—
[The text ends here without finishing the sentence.]
On
18 October 1663, the ship Achilles arrived in
Batavia at the Castle. Governor
Speelman was authorized to settle the accounts of the deceased nabob
Chanchanna with those appointed by the great Mogul, leaving out the Company's claim regarding the ship Nasareth.
Orders were given that:
- The areca nut from Bengal could be sent to Batavia
- For the first 2 years, no more areca nut would be demanded from Pegu
Advice was given about tapestries, both without gold thread and with 3 gold threads at the top, and what the Chinese thought about them. The establishment of a trading post in
Petapoli was postponed until further advice from the Coast.
Regarding the city of
Negapatam, it was ordered that it should be maintained for now, and the tax lease on trade there was approved. On this occasion it was ordered that no new construction work should be done, and no repairs except those that were absolutely necessary.
Armor for horsemen was sent to the King of
Golconda. They discussed the claim that citizen
Pieter Elmers had on the deceased nabob, and also the embassy sent to the field commander, believing it would not be good if the lease of
Arimagon and
Cuttack no longer needed to be managed.
The transfer of bills of exchange from
Golconda to
Masulipatnam was recommended again, since
Golconda to
Surat was now no more disadvantageous than
Masulipatnam had been before. A letter of advice was sent to the residents in
Masulipatnam, and likewise to the Director and Council of
Bengal, with a memorandum of errors attached.
A vessel arrived from
Makassar via
Japara with the Moorish merchant
Khoja Ibrahim, and they received a letter written by resident
Jambarra in
Makassar dated
19 September to the Honorable Lords. The letter stated that in
Makassar they very much wanted to know what merchant
Adriaen van Nieuwlandt had accomplished with the Bugis on
Buton, and they could hardly be restrained from sending an expedition there. The resident thought it would be best if the Bugis were sent not to
Batavia but to another place; otherwise the Makassarese would think they might be used against them at some point.
Against this threat, the Makassarese needed their fortifications. After the departure of the ship Arnemuiden, the stone works along the bay, which had mostly been standing still, were resumed. It was resolved to extend them from 2 miles away, except for the place where fort
Panakkukang had stood, to beyond the village
Tello, making a distance of about 6 miles. Thousands of people were now working so diligently that they were already working in the Company's field, and the resident would be forced to move the fence on the sea side in by about 36 feet.
Karaeng Sumanna did not want to return the boat and 14 cannons from the wrecked ship De Walvis, saying the boat would be useful for fetching lime and the cannons for defending the new works, instead of those the Company had taken from
Panakkukang. They still insisted on their claim to the 8,000 reals they had paid for what the fugitive of
Adrichemr had stolen from the Company, believing the Company should now seek its guarantee from
van Adrighem, since they had delivered him into the Company's hands.
The resident showed them that the Company had not negotiated with
Barra, the resident in Macassar, sent reports with the ship Leeuwinne and a small ship on 21 February. He also sent messages with the yacht de Tortelduijf from 22 October 1662, which were received on 7 June.
The people of Macassar were strengthening themselves with stone walls and fortifications. The resident explained what he thought they were planning with these defenses. They trained their men daily in using weapons. They had sent several thousand men to a place called Louvou, which the Buginese people, allied with the people from Ternate, had supposedly conquered.
Portuguese people were still in Macassar. The deserter Adrichem had supposedly gone to Bantam.
Barra asked for compensation for the damage he suffered because of this deserter and because his servant had become Muslim. Old outstanding debts had not yet been collected. Barra was condemned by the judge in Macassar to pay a certain amount of money because the king was listed as debtor in the company's books. He asked for instructions about the hopeless outstanding debts.
Francisco Vieira had agreed to pay the remainder of Crain Crongro's debt.
Barra asked that ship captains patrolling the waters near Timor be ordered to be careful around the people of Macassar. Last year, 12 small ships had come to Macassar from Banjarmassin. He described what goods the English had bought in Macassar and taken away. Barra requested instructions regarding English trade and asked whether he could sell goods on credit.
The profits in Macassar amounted to 42,444 guilders, 10 stuivers, and 4 penningen. The king and nobles ordered various goods from Batavia. Letters from Crain Sumana and Crongro were written to their Honors.
Reports from 29 May 1663 were received with a Chinese vessel on 18 June. The king handed over the deserter Adrichem to Barra and wanted back the 8,000 rixdollars he had paid the company for him. The ship den Oliphant arrived in Macassar on 22 November and then went to Amboina. The resident Barra complained about the captain of den Oliphant. There was a report about the shipwreck of the ship de Walvisch.
The merchant Nieulandt arrived in Macassar on 16 February and left again via Amboina for Ternate on 3 March. The gifts sent by their Honors to the king and nobles of Macassar were well received. Painted cloths gave a profit of 134 percent in Macassar. The warehouses in Macassar were empty. The yacht de Tortelduijf departed on 30 December 1662 with its cargo. The trading post would soon be finished, and the gifts were very well received. The painted cloths would have given more profit if they had been decorated with flowers instead of animals.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 7612 / 0105
Between
10 January 1634 and
18 January, the Dutch sent two groups of ships to
Martapura and
Pulo Laut. The first group, under Governor
Gijsbert van Lodensteijn, included the ships the Sun, Moon,
Macao,
Moca, Little Weasel, and
Negapatnam, all supplied with food and weapons and manned with soldiers. These ships were ordered to sail to the river of
Martapura and, without any consideration for the king there, to capture, destroy, and burn all ships from
Macassar that had come to collect pepper. However, they were instructed to try to maintain friendship with the king of
Martapura as much as possible. After completing their mission, they were to join the ship
Grootenbroek, which had been trading there since
15 August with little success, and together sail to
Pulo Laut. There they would intercept Portuguese and
Macassar ships that normally stopped at that location, and wait for additional ships: the
Goes,
Heusden,
Sterre, and
Amboina, which were sent on
18 January. Once all ships were united at
Pulo Laut, they were ordered to sail directly to
Macassar and immediately attack, destroy, burn, and capture all Portuguese and Indian ships found there or arriving during the blockade, except for ships belonging to their friends the English and Danes. They were to cause as much damage as possible to the city and people of
Macassar by sea and keep the harbor under strict blockade until further orders.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1111 / 0553
Between 10 and 12 men remained there in residence for the extension and clearing of forts on
Ternate, which left a deficit of 54,084 guilders.
The rice trade at
Manado did not appear to be as important for the eastern provinces as had been thought. For this reason, consideration had been given to whether the occupation could be withdrawn. However, the response was that at least 10 or 12 men needed to be maintained there for the small amount of rice that was still available, estimated at 100 to 150 lasts per year at 12 rijksdaalders per last.
The forts
Tabilolo,
Quitasol, and
Pouatte were abandoned and moved to
Tolucco. The barricade at
Callematte was cleared on
the 16th and occupied by the king's people. The garrison across all of
Molucco remained at a strength of 200 men, which was still 50 men more than had been thought necessary.
According to the books of
Castle Orange closed in February of the previous year, the costs over the preceding 12 months totaled 103,893 guilders, while the profits amounted to only 59,809 guilders, leaving
Ternate with a deficit of 54,084 guilders. Additionally, 42,240 guilders were paid annually as recognition payments to the kings of
Ternate,
Tijdor, and
Bachau.
Regarding
Makassar, two letters were received from resident
Jan Barra, dated
16 August and
25 September. These reported that the kings were becoming increasingly aware of the damage done to the city of
Makassar, which had always been a famous trading city, through the expulsion of the Portuguese and their associates. They feared that the English and Moors might also leave along with the loss of the
Makassar trade, which would leave them without any commerce or prosperity. This caused great displeasure, and efforts had been made to persuade the Portuguese to stay. However, the Portuguese themselves did not wish to remain because it had become clear that they could not rely on
Makassar's protection.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1234 / 0058
On
18 September 1823,
Dominicus Suringar, a public notary living in
Beetsterzwaag, announced that he would hold a public sale on
Friday 19 September 1823 at 1 o'clock in the afternoon. The sale would take place at the house of
Linze Eises Boonstra, an innkeeper in
Siegerswoude. Several parcels of peat would be sold, located in the peat works near
Siegerswoude. The sale was requested by
Jan Hayes van Veen, a peat boss from
Ureterp,
Salsmon Jans van Veen, and
Jan Alberts Veenstra, both peat bosses living in
Siegerswoude.
On
19 September 1823, notary
Suringar went to
Siegerswoude to the house of innkeeper
Linze Eises Boonstra to conduct the public sale under the following conditions:
- Payment would be in Dutch guilders and cents
- Payment had to be made by 1 May 1824 at the office of notary Suringar in Beetsterzwaag, in silver coins
- Buyers had to pay 10 percent of the purchase price for costs including stamps, registration, and the notary's fee
- If 2 or more people bought together, each would be responsible for the full amount
- Each buyer had to provide sufficient co-buyers who had to be present at the sale and living in the district
- Buyers who did not pay by 1 May 1824 would owe an additional penalty of 5 percent on the unpaid amount
- Buyers had to remove the peat from the land by 1 May 1824, otherwise the remaining peat would go to the landowners
After reading these conditions, the sale proceeded as follows:
- A parcel of peat in the peat works near Siegerswoude was bought by Linze Eizes Boonstra, innkeeper in Siegerswoude, for 24.50 guilders
- A similar parcel there was bought by Tjalling Pieters Ras and Hage Foekerts Veenstra from Siegerswoude for 17.50 guilders
- A similar parcel there was bought by Durk Hemkes van der Bij and Hendrik Jans Tiesema from Ureterp for 16.50 guilders
View transcript NL-0400410000 / 26 / 009015 / 000186
View transcript NL-0400410000 / 26 / 009015 / 000185
View transcript NL-0400410000 / 26 / 009015 / 000184
This document records a list of buyers at what appears to be an auction or sale. The text shows 42 numbered entries of people purchasing items, with their occupations, locations, and the amounts they paid in guilders and cents.
The buyers included:
- Hubertus (entries 1 and 10)
- Hendrik (entries 2 and 20, referred to as Hendrik Boerdonk)
- Mart (entry 3)
- Adriaan van Myswyk (entry 12), a farmer, who paid 13 guilders and 50 cents
- Adriaan van Ausswyk (entry 13), who paid 14 guilders and 50 cents
- Johannes Rnnings (entry 14), a farmer in Dinter, who paid 10 guilders and 75 cents
- Hendrik van Heeswyk (entry 15), a farmer, who paid 10 guilders and 50 cents
- Fanas van Zuthhen (entry 16), who paid 8 guilders and 25 cents
- Wilhelmus van Weerdt (entry 17), a farmer, who paid 9 guilders
- Lambert van der Heugt (entry 18), who paid 8 guilders
- Nicolaas Bolwerk (entries 19, 27, and 35), a hoop maker, who paid 14 guilders, 8 guilders and 50 cents, and 16 guilders and 50 cents respectively
- Hendrik Boerdonk (entries 20 and 32), who paid 29 guilders and 50 cents and 10 guilders and 50 cents
- Arnoldus Geerts (entries 21, 22, and 42), a farmer in Schyndel, who paid 19 guilders and 50 cents, 14 guilders and 50 cents, and 14 guilders
- Wouter van den Boom (entries 23 and 40), a farmer, who paid 13 guilders and 75 cents and 3 guilders and 50 cents
- Willem van Keszel (entry 24), a farmer, who paid 11 guilders
- Martinus van Mierlo (entries 25 and 26), a farmer, who paid 8 guilders and 50 cents and 9 guilders and 25 cents
- Dirk van den Heurel (entry 28), a farmer, who paid 13 guilders and 25 cents
- Fanas van Zusphen (entries 11, 29, and 39), who paid 5 guilders and 75 cents, 12 guilders, and 10 guilders and 25 cents
- Hendrik van der Heyden (entry 30), a farmer, who paid 12 guilders and 50 cents
- Aatoon Schoenmakers (entry 31), a farmer, who paid 11 guilders and 50 cents
- Johannes Timmermans (entry 33), a farmer, who paid 10 guilders
- Lambert Verhugten (entry 34), who paid 11 guilders
- Johannes Korsten (entry 36), a farmer, who paid 7 guilders and 75 cents
View transcript NL-HtBHIC / 7637 / 40 / 0063
The document describes a will made in
Amsterdam. The longest-living person of the couple would become the sole heir of the deceased partner. After both partners died, their property would go to heirs according to legal succession rights from the estate of the deceased. The testators (people making the will) declared this to be their last will and testament. They wanted it to be followed after their death as a will, codicil (addition to a will), gift among the living, gift in case of death, or whatever legal form would be most valid according to the law.
The following people were involved:
The witnesses confirmed they knew the testators and that these were the people whose names appeared in the document.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 605566 / 56
Jeuriaen Welt agreed and promised to pay van Noijen within 2 months from this date the 150 guilders for the yearly house rent that was due in May. He also had to pay all the house rent that would be due by the end of those 2 months in the year 1696, and from then on pay the rent every quarter year precisely when it was due, along with the costs that van Noijen had already made and would still make. Both parties pledged their persons and goods, movable and immovable, present and future, without exception, to fulfill this agreement. This was done and passed in the city of Amsterdam at the notary's office, in the presence of Harman Jansz and Jan Vosmeer, bookbinders, who were asked to be witnesses.
On 18 August 1646, Lady Sara du Pire, widow of the late Jan Wallis, notary, appeared before notary Francois Meerlo. She stated that in January 1644 she had bought at a public auction a certain house standing at the Ooster markt in this city, which at that time belonged to Anthonij Roesinck. Although the deed of sale had already been registered at the secretary's office and she had paid the 40th penny (a tax) amounting to 149 guilders and 3 stuivers to the secretaries, she had never received proper transfer of ownership because Roesingh could not meet the conditions stated in the auction document. Therefore the sale had not gone through. The lady had then complained about this by petition to the court in this city, and the secretaries had authorized and ordered in the margin of that petition that the 40th penny should be returned to her as was proper.
This was done in the city of Amsterdam at the notary's office, in the presence of Cornelis Appeln and Harman Jansen, witnesses.
On 1 August 1646, Steven Jansz van Noijen, merchant in this city, and Jeuriaen Welt, also living here, appeared before notary Francois Meerhout. They stated that at the end of 1644 they had agreed about the rent of a certain house standing and located on Uijlenburch, which Welt had rented from van Noijen for a period of one year. This period started on 1 May 1643 and would end on the last day of April 1645, for the sum of 150 guilders yearly, to be paid every quarter year in equal parts. When that year had expired without Welt having paid a single penny, van Noijen had nevertheless agreed at Welt's request that he could continue living in the same house for the following year for the same amount of 150 guilders yearly, to be paid on the same conditions, with the express agreement that Welt would immediately pay the expired year's rent to van Noijen and continue paying the future rents from quarter year to quarter year. However, since Welt at this time was unable to raise the expired rent, the parties had now agreed anew that Welt would
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 1510553 / 19
Date not specified
The longest-living spouse was given the right to decide how much to distribute to the legitimate children from the marriage. The children would not receive their full inheritance portion immediately. When the longest-living spouse remarried, they only had to prove their distribution decisions to two men, either from the family or outsiders, whom they could choose themselves. The longest-living spouse had to provide the children with the profits from the inherited property, while keeping the capital. However, the longest-living spouse did not need to make an inventory of the estate, provide detailed accounts, or offer security.
The first spouse to die appointed the surviving spouse as the sole guardian of their children and administrator of the children's property. If the surviving spouse remarried, supervising guardians would be appointed, including the person to whom the surviving spouse had provided proof regarding the children's inheritance. After the death of the surviving spouse, guardians would be appointed as the surviving spouse had chosen.
The city court chamber of the relevant locations where the testators lived or owned property was explicitly excluded from involvement in these matters.
The testators declared this to be their last will and testament, which could also be considered a codicil, a gift among the living, or a gift in case of death, to be executed after their death.
This document was made in
Amsterdam in the presence of
Jan Vosmeer and
Abraham Marier as witnesses. The witnesses confirmed they knew the testators well and that the testators were the ones mentioned in the document. The mark of
Hendrik Phunwen Hoven appeared on behalf of the testator, along with the marks of
Jan Vosmeer,
Abraham Marier, and the notary
Swerrs.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 605535 / 365
27 January 1724, Huijden. Jan Vosmeer from Pernis appeared before notary Mr. Marten Schrick in Amsterdam. Vosmeer acted with special power of attorney for Maria and Geertruijd Peltzer, who were adult daughters and children of Peltzer. Each of them inherited one-sixth part from Geertruijd Hoedenrijck, who in her life was the widow and estate holder of Matthijs Peltzer. They also inherited one-fourth part from their deceased brother Albertus Peltzer. Vosmeer declared in his capacity that he received and took over the following 4 bonds from the children and heirs of Guillelmo Hoedenrijck, Eduard Entinck, and Joannes Hooft, who in their lives had been guardians over Maria Peltzer and Geertruijd Peltzer:
- One bond charged to the common land of Holland at the office of this city for the sum of 1,283 guilders and 6 stuivers in the name of Albertus, Geertruijd, Maria, and Coenraet Peltzer. The name of Maria was left out by mistake in the voluntary judgment on the transaction mentioned later. Dated 1 June 1689, number 1824, folio 124 verso, registered 30 November 1691, number 10367, register folio 687.
- One similar bond for the sum of 1,200 guilders in the name of Willem Harmensz, dated 17 August 1653, folio 354, registered 24 December 1653, register folio 241.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 1526404 / 76
Hastij and his brothers received so much support from the distant villages that the messenger from the
Orang Kaya (local chiefs) could not deliver them, even if he had promised to hand over these three brothers. This could not be achieved without leaving behind such remnants of rebellion that it would be better to remain in complete war. The people of
Boero (Buru) wanted these three men to be considered their rightful countrymen, not people from
Ternate, since they were born on
Boero and had never seen
Ternate.
The Dutch could not arrange this matter as they wished and therefore decided to send
Hastij and his brothers away without settling the issue, waiting for a better opportunity. They were told they would be satisfied when peace was fully achieved and the work on
Boero with the gathering of villages at
Kaieli would be firmly established.
In the meantime, the Dutch took as much security as possible by completely stripping
Hastij of his power, which he and the
Orang Kaya of
Boero seemed happy to accept.
It was agreed that:
- 4 of the most important people from Boero would constantly live at the Castle as hostages under the Governor's supervision
- The first group included the sergeant Romaite, the Orang Kaya Housman from Waisamu, the Orang Kaya from Hat, and Hastij's brother Captain Land, whom they trusted the least
- These hostages would be replaced every year according to the agreement
Since the gathering of villages at
Kaieli could not proceed steadily without building a wooden barricade there, the Dutch considered this necessary and built one. It would be maintained as long as the authorities wished, but in their opinion it could be removed once all the people of
Boero lived there and peace with
Makassar was firmly established.
They also thought about abandoning the other barricade on
Amblau in place of this one. This had recently been fully decided in council but without effect because of the large number of nutmeg trees found on
Boero as mentioned before. Once these had been brought home safely, they would proceed with this plan, since no more spice trees were found on
Amblau after careful investigation.
Hastij and his brother
Captain Land were now with them in the
Hongi (fleet); the third brother stayed home. They hoped to send all three, or at least one of them, to the authorities that same year. The outcome of matters upon their return to
Amboina would inform them further.
View transcript NL-HaNA / 1.04.02 / 1229 / 1048
- Susanna Fevett, widow of Jan Hulleman, received 200 Caroli guilders one time.
- Elisabeth Groenewold, widow of Hendrik van der Gate, also received 200 guilders one time.
- Lea Lanori, the third unmarried daughter, received 50 Caroli guilders one time.
- The woman making the will left to Maria Offerman, an elderly unmarried daughter, all her furniture, gold, silver, household goods, linen, and wool that she left behind.
- Maria Hendrik, widow of Jan Vosmeer, was to receive 6 bed sheets, 6 pillowcases, 12 shirts, 12 napkins, and all the German clothes belonging to the woman making the will when she died.
- The woman making the will named as her only and universal heirs: Olida, wife of Coenraat Farret, together with her brother Benjt and their children together for one third part, and if one died before, their descendants would take their parent's place.
- Maria Hendriks, widow of Jan Losmeer, also received one third part.
- Maria Offerman together with the children of her deceased brother received the remaining one third part in their father's place, as unmarried daughter.
- However, regarding Maria Offerman, if she remained unmarried, there was a condition that if she came to marry, she would be obligated before the marriage to pay out to the children of her deceased brother Hendrik Offerman.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 1510409 / 760
- Helena Coninck, widow of H
- Pieter de Witt
- Helena van der Valk, widow of Gerrit van der Wielen
- Hendrina Duijsent Daelders, widow of Fredrick Noorthoorn, and Maria Noorthoorn
- Harmen Boeleke and Barbara van den Boer, married couple
- Herman Bitter and Mr. Dionijs Jan Bailli for himself and others
- Herman Crul
- Harmen Sipkes Lant and Diewertje Frieskes, married couple
- Hermanus van Ledde
- Hendrick Lamus: inventory of the estate, division, power of attorney to Jacob Marchant for division, agreement, will, declaration, power of attorney to the widow Driessen on Heijden and sons, will, deed of indemnity and guarantee for Mr. Francois and Jan van Hemert, deed of non prejudice
- Jan Vosmeer on one side and Elisabeth Tweedenrijck and others on the other side: settlement
- Jacob Cornelis van der Sluijs and Anna Bartha Blom, married couple: will, receipt for the children and heirs of Gulderijck, Ed. Eentinck and Johannes Hooft
- Jan Vosmeer: power of attorney to Johannes Covens the Younger
- Johannes Covens
- Johanna van Brugge, widow of reverend Aite van Rutgerus van Ulsen: renunciation and transfer for her children
- Jan Bernd Bicker and Lady Johanna Sara Pels: will, power of attorney to Roeloff Wijlants
- Johanna van der Voort: power of attorney to Mr. Dionijs Jan Bailli
- Jan Hulst: will
- Jannetje Heijne: power of attorney to Charles Le Roij
- Jaques Courbe: formal notification to Mr. Pieter Graafland
- Jacobus Wantenaer
- Jacob van Langeren on one side and Teuntje van Langeren on the other side: deed of purchase and sale, transfer for Mr. Pieter Graafland
- Jan Bogaard, attorney
- Jacobus Wantenaer: letters patent for the same, transfer for Armina Ameshoff, widow of Harmanus Leningh
- Jan Bogaard, attorney: transfer for Mr. Pieter Graafland
- Jan Elias Huijdekoper
- Johannes Bokkenberg and Margare
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 1526404 / 707
The agreement did not require any summons or prior warning to be valid. The parties promised to uphold and enforce whatever the mentioned attorneys would arrange based on this document. They also agreed to maintain and fulfill this agreement at all times, with legal obligations as required by law, and requested and consented to official documentation.
However, regarding
Geertruijd Brasker, the widow of the late
Albertus Swederrijk, this agreement only applied to her minor children if it received approval from the honorable court of the city of
Edam.
The document was signed in the city of
Amsterdam in the presence of witnesses
Adam Scheepe and
Fredrick van Grol.
The following people signed the document:
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 1526404 / 14
Hendrik Offerman's children were to receive an inheritance when certain conditions were met. Regarding
Maria Hendriks, widow of
Jan Vosmeer, the testator's express wish was that her house and property located in the
Hoogstraat within the city would be sold by the executors after the testator's death. The full proceeds from the testator's inheritance portion would be secured on the aforementioned house for
Maria Hendriks, who would remain bound to it. The buyers had to continue paying the widow
Jan Vosmeer from the proceeds of the inheritance portion to
Maria Hendriks, and after her death to her children, a sum of 200 guilders with interest, first on the full sum and then on the remaining capital at 3 percent per year. This would continue until the complete execution and payment of the mentioned capital. The testator appointed executors of the testament, administrators of the estate, and organizers of the burial. They were to pay out the net proceeds of the estate to each of the previously named heirs according to their portion.
Frans and
Jan Dominicus Tier, residing in the city, were appointed with the request that if one died, the other would continue.
View transcript NL-AsdSAA / 1510409 / 761
- On 28 March 1903, Johannes Vosmeer, a private individual living in Haarlem, appeared before notary Benjamin Egbertus Cornelius Seignette in Haarlem.
- Vosmeer acknowledged that he legally owed Antonius Vasen Hendrikszoon, a cloth bleacher living in Haarlem, a sum of 4,000 guilders in Dutch currency.
- The money came from a loan that was provided when this document was signed.
- The debtor agreed to pay back the loan in 5 years from that date, or afterwards within 3 months after a demand for payment was made by either party.
- The debtor had to pay interest of 4.25% per year, starting on that day and to be paid every 6 months on 28 March and 28 September of each year, with the first payment due on 28 September of that year.
- All payments of principal and interest had to be made directly to the creditor at his home, in good Dutch money, without deduction or debt settlement, and all costs of collection, demand, warning and payment would be at the debtor's expense.
- As security for repayment of the capital and correct interest payment, the debtor mortgaged a shop house with separate upper dwelling and land in Haarlem, at Spaarnwouderstraat, marked 96 black and red, cadastral Section D number 2699, measuring 52 centiares, which belonged to the undersigned in full and unencumbered ownership.
- It was further agreed that the mortgaged property had to be maintained in good condition, could not be changed in nature or purpose or reduced in value, all taxes had to be paid promptly, and the property could only be rented out or given to others for use with written consent of the creditor.
- The buildings on the mortgaged property, present or still to be built, had to be and remain insured against fire damage, proof of which had to be shown to the creditor on request and especially when paying interest.
View transcript NL-HlmNHA / 6701019 / 15
Previous pageNext page